Strange concrete structure in R 611 & R 669
-
- Member
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 07 Jan 2005, 19:30
- Location: Belgium
Strange concrete structure in R 611 & R 669
Gentlemen,
Those concrete appendices are discovered on the right side of the embrasure (seen from the kampfraum), sketch added from the exterior. The only one who discussed this feature but without giving a straight answer is late Ph. Francart in his “Mur de l’Atlantique en Belgique”.
Has anyone of you studied those strange structures?
Next time I’ll visit StP Bamburg I’ll measure the appendice.
Cordially,
Robert Dehon
Those concrete appendices are discovered on the right side of the embrasure (seen from the kampfraum), sketch added from the exterior. The only one who discussed this feature but without giving a straight answer is late Ph. Francart in his “Mur de l’Atlantique en Belgique”.
Has anyone of you studied those strange structures?
Next time I’ll visit StP Bamburg I’ll measure the appendice.
Cordially,
Robert Dehon
- Attachments
-
- Embrasurre sketch 611/669
- Embrasure sketch.jpg (43.03 KiB) Viewed 2590 times
-
- Member
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: 14 Jul 2005, 16:38
- Location: netherlands
Well Robert,
Now do you believe me...........
But Jos i do not see the concrete block on your picture, but i am convinced
that it is to make the scharte smaller, on the most guns the gunsight
(for aiming) is on the left side of the gun so there was no block.
For so far my thoughts.............
Greetings Jack
Maybe till this summer when I will try to visit the Fort Creche.
Now do you believe me...........
But Jos i do not see the concrete block on your picture, but i am convinced
that it is to make the scharte smaller, on the most guns the gunsight
(for aiming) is on the left side of the gun so there was no block.
For so far my thoughts.............
Greetings Jack
Maybe till this summer when I will try to visit the Fort Creche.
-
- Member
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 07 Jan 2005, 19:30
- Location: Belgium
Schartenverkleinerung
Dear Jos, Jack and Erik,
Well, before all thanks for the documents, I’m beginning to see the light… through the scharte.
Jack’s question is yet interesting. If the scharte aperture should be diminished for a reason or another, I then suppose they would position one or several steel plates bolted together against our concrete structure? How the plates were secured in place against the concrete?
I’ll come again concerning the R 669 for two another strange features I don’t know what about.
All the best,
Robert
Well, before all thanks for the documents, I’m beginning to see the light… through the scharte.
Jack’s question is yet interesting. If the scharte aperture should be diminished for a reason or another, I then suppose they would position one or several steel plates bolted together against our concrete structure? How the plates were secured in place against the concrete?
I’ll come again concerning the R 669 for two another strange features I don’t know what about.
All the best,
Robert
- Panzerfaust60
- Member
- Posts: 139
- Joined: 07 Dec 2005, 23:13
- Location: Iceland
- Panzerfaust60
- Member
- Posts: 139
- Joined: 07 Dec 2005, 23:13
- Location: Iceland
Hello Panzerfaust60
The problem is that the R. 611 or R. 669 were made to
house guns from 7,5 cm up to 15,5 K. 425 (f) , all with
different measurments ,wheels and gunshields .
To get a minimal opening of the bunker together with the
gunshield of the gun , they add extra concrete slabs on the
sides of the gunopening .
And offcouse a direct hit in the frontopening and gun room
is deadly .
Regards Jos
P.S. Thanks for the blueprint of the R. 700
The problem is that the R. 611 or R. 669 were made to
house guns from 7,5 cm up to 15,5 K. 425 (f) , all with
different measurments ,wheels and gunshields .
To get a minimal opening of the bunker together with the
gunshield of the gun , they add extra concrete slabs on the
sides of the gunopening .
And offcouse a direct hit in the frontopening and gun room
is deadly .
Regards Jos
P.S. Thanks for the blueprint of the R. 700
-
- Member
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 07 Jan 2005, 19:30
- Location: Belgium
R 611, 662 & 669 strange features (and Vickers M39)
Dear all,
Once again thank you for your help. Mainly Jos with his splendid plans (and patience).
Some questions are still on the bench but the truth is out there.
To end the matter I'll add I was right to ask those questions a second time on an other forum. Indeed the historian being professionnal or not is bound to cross information.
All the best,
Robert
Once again thank you for your help. Mainly Jos with his splendid plans (and patience).
Some questions are still on the bench but the truth is out there.
To end the matter I'll add I was right to ask those questions a second time on an other forum. Indeed the historian being professionnal or not is bound to cross information.
All the best,
Robert
Re: Strange concrete structure in R 611 & R 669
Schartenverkleinerung missing : on all Regelbau 669 Equipped for 15,2 cm K.433 (r)
and some Regelbau 669 Equipped for 12,2 cm K.390 (r) but not all !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
and some Regelbau 669 Equipped for 12,2 cm K.390 (r) but not all !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Strange concrete structure in R 611 & R 669
Good discussion here: one more question. Are these "Scharteverkleinerungen" made during the build or afterwards ?
looking at the picture I was wondering why the "lumb"of concrete "hangs"from the ceiling and doesn't cover the whole side.
looking at the picture I was wondering why the "lumb"of concrete "hangs"from the ceiling and doesn't cover the whole side.
Thanks,
Wim
www.petromax.nl
3D : http://www.petromax.nl/Hanstholm.html
http://www.petromax.nl/DeBeer.html
Wim
www.petromax.nl
3D : http://www.petromax.nl/Hanstholm.html
http://www.petromax.nl/DeBeer.html