Hi...
Thanks all for the photos.... thanks a lot!!! This forum is wonderfull!
MP-43/44
I understand your problem Erik
How can someone give credit to a picture,if the man who posted it,didden't post the credit of that picture.
Greetings
Sander D
I keep a eye on 30 forums,but the Third reich forum is the only form where you can attach pictures in you post,for me it's the one and only one.but if you download it and post it here without remembering where you got it, you could certainly do the same on 10 other forums.
That's a tricky guestion,and it heapen on most of the forums.The problems start when people download original photos and repost them without source.....
How can someone give credit to a picture,if the man who posted it,didden't post the credit of that picture.
If i can help someone out with a picture,i bring them online,i'm not the only one who do this, but i bring them not all online ,that's not mine intention,that's a line i will not pass.If your intention for downloading is to use them online again
Greetings
Sander D
Hello again Sander!
As I said, really no problem for me, but where should the line go?
Maybe some other member would take it much worse if it was his photo!?
I have no problems sharing photos. I guess I have posted 500+ photos during my time here. If I wanted to keep them for myself, I would have added a copy protection text or something.
I have never turned down any requests for photos, and you can find them spread on loads of web-pages, magazines and books.
The only difference is that I said it was ok!
I think if you want to use someones photos, you should ask for permission, or atleast add source or link. This is my oppinion, and others may not agree. Anyway, I would like to add that the law of copyright does also exsist on the www
Erik
As I said, really no problem for me, but where should the line go?
Maybe some other member would take it much worse if it was his photo!?
I have no problems sharing photos. I guess I have posted 500+ photos during my time here. If I wanted to keep them for myself, I would have added a copy protection text or something.
I have never turned down any requests for photos, and you can find them spread on loads of web-pages, magazines and books.
The only difference is that I said it was ok!
I think if you want to use someones photos, you should ask for permission, or atleast add source or link. This is my oppinion, and others may not agree. Anyway, I would like to add that the law of copyright does also exsist on the www
Erik
-
Flammenwerfer
- Member
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 08 Dec 2003, 21:57
- Location: USA
-
LegalAssassin
- Member
- Posts: 353
- Joined: 25 Oct 2003, 18:24
- Location: Kalmar, Sweden
-
David Lehmann
- Member
- Posts: 2863
- Joined: 01 Apr 2002, 11:50
- Location: France
-
General Patton
- Member
- Posts: 320
- Joined: 25 Sep 2002, 22:48
- Location: USA
@ Erik E
@ Erik E
What is the gun in the middle of your pic with the FG-42 at the bottom. I once saw it in a book called "Great Weapons of World War Two", and a GI was holding it, and they called it an FG-42, but I thought it looked smaller, had the bipod in the middle of the gun, had more metal, adn a different muzzle. Can you, or anyone else, enlighten me to what kind of gun it is, and if it was ever used, what kind of ammo it used (A short Smk round like the FG-42, or a long like Kar-98, or other), and anything elese about. Thanks in advance
Patton
What is the gun in the middle of your pic with the FG-42 at the bottom. I once saw it in a book called "Great Weapons of World War Two", and a GI was holding it, and they called it an FG-42, but I thought it looked smaller, had the bipod in the middle of the gun, had more metal, adn a different muzzle. Can you, or anyone else, enlighten me to what kind of gun it is, and if it was ever used, what kind of ammo it used (A short Smk round like the FG-42, or a long like Kar-98, or other), and anything elese about. Thanks in advance
Patton
)
-
Jack Nisley
- Member
- Posts: 357
- Joined: 19 Dec 2002, 03:37
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
For Erik E. and General Patton:
The middle gun in the picture is the frst model of the FG 42. After about 1700 had been made, supplies of manganese steel alloy used in its manufacture became in critical short supply. The FG 42 was redesigned to use carbon steel. The second model FG 42, (bottom of the picture) was basically all new design, longer and heavier than first model, using the same operating principle and the same bayonet. Total production of FG 42 was about 7,000 rifles.
Info from "Guns of the Reich" by Markham, "Weapons of the Third Reich" by Gander and Chamberlain, "Small Arms of the World" by Smith.
Jack Nisley
The middle gun in the picture is the frst model of the FG 42. After about 1700 had been made, supplies of manganese steel alloy used in its manufacture became in critical short supply. The FG 42 was redesigned to use carbon steel. The second model FG 42, (bottom of the picture) was basically all new design, longer and heavier than first model, using the same operating principle and the same bayonet. Total production of FG 42 was about 7,000 rifles.
Info from "Guns of the Reich" by Markham, "Weapons of the Third Reich" by Gander and Chamberlain, "Small Arms of the World" by Smith.
Jack Nisley
-
Panzerphile
- Member
- Posts: 14
- Joined: 25 Jan 2004, 08:52
- Location: Australia
MP 44 diagrams
Does anyone have plans or schematics of the MP 43, 44, 45 family they could share? I need some pretty accurate drawings to model a fullscale MP rifle apon. The real thing is a bit scarce in Australia. Will pay for copying and shipping if necessary
All help greatly appreciated.
All help greatly appreciated.