Italy's 4 engined bomber

Discussions on all aspects of Italy under Fascism from the March on Rome to the end of the war.
gabriel pagliarani
Member
Posts: 1583
Joined: 01 Aug 2002, 04:11
Location: ITALY

Re: Good link

#16

Post by gabriel pagliarani » 21 Aug 2005, 22:06

Axisfactbook wrote:Hello,Here is a Good link

Sorry but it's in dutch,except the tabels(so you can read this :D)

http://users.skynet.be/milvlieg/index.htm

Best Regards

Axisfactbook...
I can see only fine Heinkel waterplanes

User avatar
SM79Sparviero
Member
Posts: 136
Joined: 18 Oct 2002, 10:01
Location: Culqualber

#17

Post by SM79Sparviero » 22 Aug 2005, 07:22

Piaggio P112 :an improved version of P108, with better streamlined elevator and nose .

Piaggio P114:floatplane bomber-reconeissance version of P112
Attachments
piaggio112.jpg
From Aerofan,n.64, January 1998
piaggio112.jpg (95.99 KiB) Viewed 1936 times
piaggio114.jpg
piaggio114.jpg (30.05 KiB) Viewed 1936 times


User avatar
Vincent S.
Member
Posts: 214
Joined: 19 Aug 2005, 12:10
Location: Belgium, near "Kleidungslager Herentals"
Contact:

Respond

#18

Post by Vincent S. » 22 Aug 2005, 10:14

Hello,


Yea,I'm sorry,but maybe it's "hidden" in the categorie :proefvliegtuigen(testplanes in English)

Good Luck

Axisfactbook....

|AXiN|
Member
Posts: 138
Joined: 26 May 2004, 08:53
Location: Australia

#19

Post by |AXiN| » 22 Aug 2005, 15:05

So can I take it that neither of these designs got very far?

User avatar
Scarlett
Member
Posts: 295
Joined: 11 Oct 2004, 19:53
Location: Southern Germany

#20

Post by Scarlett » 28 Aug 2005, 19:26

Of the Piaggio P.108B a total of 163 was built.
After some nights attacks on Gibraltar in early 1942 the type saw service in the Mediterranean, North Africa and Russia theatres of operation.

The aircraft was very unreliable mechanically. Frequently they disappeared without a trace over the Mediterranean.

The deputy chief of air staff described the aircraft after the war as "vere debolezze volanti", which means roughly "flying feebleness".

The losses were such, that less than 5% of the 163 built servived to serve with the Republican Socialist airforce after the armistice with the Allies.

User avatar
SM79Sparviero
Member
Posts: 136
Joined: 18 Oct 2002, 10:01
Location: Culqualber

P108

#21

Post by SM79Sparviero » 29 Aug 2005, 21:25

The aircraft was very unreliable mechanically. Frequently they disappeared without a trace over the Mediterranean.

The deputy chief of air staff described the aircraft after the war as "vere debolezze volanti", which means roughly "flying feebleness
I don't think that P108 was less reliable than "flying lighter" Heinkel 177, for comparable motivations:they were both too young, they had unreliable engines....
P108 had not as long time as B17 , its inspiration source , to resolve its own troubles that were not different from the first ones of the newborn Flying Fortress.It was projected, built and launched on the battlefield in two years without those indispensable tests that could improve the first dangerous prototypes of B17 up to an operative validity.
More, the true winner of the B.G.R. italian public competition of 1938 ( Bombardiere a Grande Raggio=Long Range Bomber) was CANT Z 1014 , a superlative four engine bomber with a projected maximum speed over 500 km/H thanks to its streamlined narrow fuselage , with 6 20 MM guns for its defence.
Piaggio won the competition only because they later offered P108 with a 50 % discount.

I think that CZ 1014 neither could overcome the troubles of its engines , Alfa Romeo 135 or Piaggio P XII:
Poor steel alloys for the lacking of chrome and nickel for cylinders and valves;no turbochargers ,that would have been anyway unreliable for the same motivations;"autarchic" rubber for the pistons ; high stroke/bore ratio to improve engine power just to keep the same cylinder head ( the most problematic component of the engine) as the original Gnome-Rhone or Bristol projects , with a consequent too high linear speed of the pistons and too high torque on the rods and on their connections with the shaft, , it would work for a ride on a Harley-Davidson at 80 Km/h or for the job of a tractor at 15 Km/h or a Chevrolet Corvette ( "nothing is better than cubic inches") but it wouldn't for an aeronautical engine that works at high RPM for most of its time.

Volklin
Member
Posts: 799
Joined: 18 Apr 2004, 02:24

#22

Post by Volklin » 03 Sep 2005, 03:11

that's a beautiful craft

User avatar
SM79Sparviero
Member
Posts: 136
Joined: 18 Oct 2002, 10:01
Location: Culqualber

#23

Post by SM79Sparviero » 03 Sep 2005, 12:58

Cant Z1014, from "Le Officine aeronautiche CANT" 1923-1945 , by Gianfranco Garello and Decio Murri, Aeronautica Militare historical office
Attachments
cz1014.jpg
cz1014.jpg (40.92 KiB) Viewed 1751 times

Andreas
Member
Posts: 6938
Joined: 10 Nov 2002, 15:12
Location: Europe

#24

Post by Andreas » 03 Sep 2005, 14:00

A post on Luftwaffe ammunition was split off:

http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=84999

All the best

Andreas

|AXiN|
Member
Posts: 138
Joined: 26 May 2004, 08:53
Location: Australia

#25

Post by |AXiN| » 04 Sep 2005, 03:38

Were there any further developments of the Cant Z 1014? It's not easy to find information on Italian strategic bombers in the English language, and you seem to have some very good sources.

User avatar
Cantankerous
Member
Posts: 1277
Joined: 01 Sep 2019, 22:22
Location: Newport Coast

Re:

#26

Post by Cantankerous » 17 May 2022, 23:52

|AXiN| wrote:
04 Sep 2005, 03:38
Were there any further developments of the Cant Z 1014? It's not easy to find information on Italian strategic bombers in the English language, and you seem to have some very good sources.
There was apparently a precursor design to the CANT Z.1014, the four-engine Z.1008 (see list of aircraft designs envisaged by the CANT company), but there were no further developments of the Z.1014. In retrospect, the Z.1014 competed with the Piaggio P.108 but the Regia Aeronautica selected the P.108 rather than the Z.1014 for production anyway.

Post Reply

Return to “Italy under Fascism 1922-1945”