Pacific Navy,
medium submarines
Shch-type, V series:
Shch-101 “Losos” (“Salmon”): didn’t participate in combat runs, reequipped into submarine-minelayer in 1942, survived the war.
Shch-102 “Leshch” (“Bream”): stopped the suspicious Japanese seine-net fishing vessel in summer 1938 [during the Battle at Lake Khasan] near Vladivostok (sea mines ready to lay were found in the holds of that vessel), 1 combat run in August 1945, no torpedo attacks, survived the war.
Shch-103 “Karp” (“Carp”): pre-war loss (ran aground in Ussuriisk Bay during extremely strong storm 04.11.1935 and got several holes against stones, all crewmembers left the waterlogged submarine next day; the submarine was raised and towed to Vladivostok 27.03.-03.04.1936 and scrapped there)
Shch-104 “Nalim” (“Burbot”): 1 combat run in August 1945, no torpedo attacks, survived the war.
Shch-105 “Keta” (“Calico salmon”): 1 combat run in August 1945, no torpedo attacks, survived the war.
Shch-106 “Sudak” (“Pike-perch”): didn’t participate in combat runs, survived the war.
Shch-107 “Sig” (“Vendace”): didn’t participate in combat runs, survived the war.
Shch-108 “Forel” (“Trout”): didn’t participate in combat runs, survived the war.
Shch-109 “Som” (“Catfish”): didn’t participate in combat runs, survived the war.
Shch-110 “Yaz” (“Orfe”): didn’t participate in combat runs, survived the war.
Shch-111 “Karas” (“Crucian carp”): didn’t participate in combat runs, survived the war.
Shch-112 “Peskar” (“Gudgeon”): didn’t participate in combat runs, survived the war.
Shch-type, V-bis series:
Shch-113 “Sterlyad” (“Sterlet”): didn’t participate in combat runs, survived the war.
Shch-114 “Sevryuga” (“Starred sturgeon”): didn’t participate in combat runs, survived the war.
Shch-115 “Skat” (“Skate”): didn’t participate in combat runs, survived the war.
Shch-116 “Osetr” (“Sturgeon”): didn’t participate in combat runs, survived the war.
Shch-117 “Makrel” (“Mackerel”): 1 combat run in August 1945, no torpedo attacks, survived the war.
Shch-118 “Kefal” (“Mullet”): 1 combat run in August 1945 (landed reconnaissance group near port Maoka 17.08.1945 which supported landing operation), no torpedo attacks, survived the war.
Shch-119 “Beluga” (“Great sturgeon”): 2 combat runs in August 1945 (transported fuel to Otomari for Soviet ships 01.09.1945), 2 unsuccessful torpedo attacks, survived the war.
Shch-120 “Navaga” (“Salmon trout”): didn’t participate in combat runs, survived the war.
Shch-type, V-bis-2 series:
Shch-121 “Zubatka” (“Lancet fish”): didn’t participate in combat runs, survived the war.
Shch-122 “Saida” (“Pollack”): 1 combat run in August 1945, no torpedo attacks, survived the war.
Shch-123 “Ugor” (“Eel”): 1 combat run in August 1945, no torpedo attacks, survived the war [19.08.1945 avoided by manoeuvring the torpedo attack of Japanese submarine].
Shch-124 “Paltus” (“Sandfish”): didn’t participate in combat runs, survived the war.
Shch-125 “Muksun”: didn’t participate in combat runs, survived the war.
Shch-type, X series:
Shch-126: 1 combat run in August 1945, no torpedo attacks, 1 successful artillery attack (21.08.1945, Japanese fishing motorboat was sunk, 8 cables, 50 45mm shells were spent), survived the war.
Shch-127: 1 combat run in August 1945 (detected enemy detachment 14.08.1945 – 1 cruiser and 4 destroyers and traced it according to the order), no torpedo attacks, survived the war.
Shch-128: didn’t participate in combat runs, survived the war.
Shch-129: didn’t participate in combat runs, survived the war.
Shch-130: didn’t participate in combat runs, survived the war.
Shch-131: didn’t participate in combat runs, survived the war.
Shch-132: didn’t participate in combat runs, survived the war.
Shch-133: didn’t participate in combat runs, survived the war.
Shch-134: 1 combat run in August 1945, no torpedo attacks, survived the war.
Shch-139: didn’t participate in combat runs, survived the war.
Shch-type, X-bis series:
Shch-135: 1 combat run in August 1945, no torpedo attacks, survived the war.
Shch-136: didn’t participate in combat runs, survived the war.
Shch-137: didn’t participate in combat runs, survived the war.
Shch-138: lost with 36 crewmembers 18.07.1942 in Nikolaevsk-Na Amure (submarine stayed at the berth when its four reserve torpedoes exploded because of possible Japanese diversion [the investigation found that deputy commander P. Egorov who was ashore during the incident put a pistol to his head trying to escape the punishment], the hull of submarine was very heavily damaged and submarine sank; raised 08.08.1942 but sank again in 3 days because of strong storm; raised again 29.09.1942 and scrapped soon).
P.S. To moderator - I finished the full list about victories/fates of all submarines of the North Navy (see above). But some newest confirmed info appeared [I also communicated with Dr. Morozov for this] so we need in some small corrections.
My old variant:
M-106 "Leninsky komsomol": 3 combat runs (30 days), no torpedo attacks, lost with 23 crewmembers around 05.-08.07.1943 (exploded on mine of mine fields NW-30/Sperre-III or, most probably, sank by flying boat BV 138 from 3/KFGr 406 08.07.43 - German pilot reported about oil spot after bomb attack).
Shch-422: 1 combat run during the Winter war (11 days), 15 combat runs (223 days), 18 torpedo attacks (one + one successful - 12.09.1941, 70.57'/29.00', single ship, 1 torpedo from 5 cables - Norwegian transport "Ottar Jarl" 1459 brt with packaged cargos on its way to Germany was sunk, 1 its crewmember was lost; and the same day, anchored Norwegian transport "Tanahorn" 336 brt was hit by 1 torpedo from 8 cables in the port Berlevog but torpedo didn't explode and damaged the ship only), 1 successful artillery attack (26.01.1942, 71.06'/28.32', Norwegian fishing motorboat "Björg" F3G 10 brt was sunk by two 45mm shells, the crew of 3 men was captured before shelling), 1 destruction of detected floating mine by artillery fire (23.07.1942). Lost with 45 crewmembers after 01.07.1943 (exploded on mine of mine field Speer-IV, or, most probably (because there is a small possibility that it could be also M-106, see above) she was counter-attacked by German submarine chasers UJ 1206, UJ 1212, UJ 1214, UJ 1217 and patrol ship NH 06 05.07.1943 in the point 70.31'/30.59' - heavily damaged by depth charges (73 were dropped) and rammed after that by UJ 1217 when the deck-house appeared above water; large oil trace 700 m long was detected after ramming).
It should be noted that once Shch-422 withstood, probably, the most strong attack against Soviet submarines during the war - M 343 and UJ 1206 dropped 356 depth charges during 3-hour pursuit of Shch-422 31.05.1943.
This info in my corresponding posts (from 5 and 6 January) should be changed [thanks in advance to moderator] because the possible reason of loss given for Shch-422 corresponds to the reason of loss of M-106 in reality, and vice versa. The German combat report of UJ-group of 12th flotilla mentions small submarine instead of medium.
So, the more correct info shold be the following:
for M-106 - ...lost with 23 crewmembers 05.07.1943 in the point 70.31'/30.59' - counter-attacked after unsuccessful torpedo attack by German submarine chasers UJ 1206, UJ 1217 and patrol ship NH 06, was heavily damaged by depth charges (73 were dropped) and rammed at 06:35 by UJ 1217 when the deck-house appeared above water, capsized submarine sank and large oil trace 700 m long was detected after ramming.
for Shch-422 - ...Lost with 45 crewmembers around 05.-08.07.1943 (exploded on mine of mine fields NW-30/Sperre-III or, probably, sank 08.07.1943 by flying boat BV 138 from 3/KFGr 406 - German pilot reported about oil spot after bomb attack).
Regards, BP
You should read more info in modern memoires of veterans (published by Artem Drabkin, the friend of Bair), for example. The Soviet system prohibited (didn't encourage is a very light term for this) to discuss the unfavourable truth on public [this includes propaganda literature, of course] but all sources for the internal office use [as reports] must be as much truthful as possible (one of the reason that NKVD archives in Russia don't have the full access even now), the leaders of dictator state should know all the truth in their country to know how to rule. Do you know that many reports to Stalin during the Winter war was returned back with his signature - "To check ones more and report me again". Official propaganda literature and radio reported to population differ things during WWII than units and HQ reports, of course. Interesting case is local army newspapers which aim was to increase the morale of soldiers, several very strict orders of high-level commissars are known to their editors with the ask to describe the combats not in very propaganda style but close to the real facts because soldiers who participated in those combats directly read such newspapers also. But, of course, the only good sources is original log-books and reports.