Well, early in the war a number of construction battalions were formed from drafted personnel (mostly of older ages or certain ethnic groups) and were employed either on military works (construction of fortifications) or by civil agencies. In September 1941 in order to rationalize expenses for army's subsistence they were reorganized as labor columns/construction columns and attached to respective civil agencies, which were now fully responsible for their supply. Additional formation of labor columns and assignment to civilian agencies continued after that. In January-February 1942 conscription of Soviet Germans subject to military service to labor columns was additionally ordered. As of 1 April 1942 there were 1487 labor columns with 1.326.330 men (including 105 "German" columns with 98,484 men). In April 1942 it was ordered to stop further formations and return from labor columns all officers as well as enlisted men suitable for military service for replenishment of the army. However, in October 1942 additional drafts of Romanian, Finns, Hungarian and Italian men of military age as well as German teenagers, old men and women to labor columns were ordered as a well as a draft of 350,000 natives of Central Asia. On a smaller scale transfers of conscripts to civil works continued in the following years, i.e. when there was a need in workforce in some specific place or for some specific project which couldn't be met they were drafted or transferred from military. At the same time workers reserved in national economy were gradually replaced with conscripted personnel of older ages or unfit for health reasons.TheMarcksPlan wrote: ↑21 Aug 2021 11:35Because the auto-translate feature I've used to read the document you linked (thanks again) isn't great, is it clear in your opinion that 2.54mil "assigned to work in national economy" means "assigned [from the armed forces]..." Or does does that number include people conscripted into national service in the economy but never put into the armed forces (untrusted minorities like Volga Germans, children of kulaks, etc.).
If these transfers of personnel occurred from military units and immediately after draft is IMO irrelevant from arithmetical point of view. They were drafted according to the law on military service and must be included in the aggregate mobilization stats.
That was a crude estimate which missed many substantial elements. It seems that Shchadenko didn't have direct and complete information on either losses or the number of men mobilized and used indirect estimates instead.Lopukhovsky's The Price of Victory reproduces Schadenko's Sept 1, 1942 report as Appendix C.