I have come accross several Russian blog sites and forums showing the Soviet losses tank and SPG losses in WW2. These data had already been provided by Krivosheev years ago but now the data are also given by type. I am interested in knowing the background to this information. Is it a calculation from an author? Does it come from an archive?
Tank and SPG losses to all causes:
- 1.235 IS
- 3.755 KV
- 41.971 T-34
- 370 T-28
- 7.124 BT
- 9.097 T-26
- 10.881 T-60/70
- 2.675 amphibian.
- 176 Mk-4
- 1.804 M-4A2
- 696 M3 Stuart
- 783 MK-1/2/3/5/7
- 2.301 Mk-9/-11
- 691 M3 Lee
- 1.671 otros
Total: 83.560 tanks
- 507 SU-122
- 409 SU-152
- 672 ISU-122
- 734 ISU-152
- 1853 SU-85
- 381 SU-100
- 196 SU-57
- 6.452 SU-76
- 1.807 foreign SPGs
Total: 13.011 SPGs
http://legatus-minor.livejournal.com/2011/03/23/
http://forum.worldoftanks.ru/index.php? ... e__st__260
Soviet tank and SPG losses 1941-45 by type
- Alejandro_
- Member
- Posts: 404
- Joined: 21 May 2003, 14:26
- Location: UK
- Contact:
Re: Soviet tank and SPG losses 1941-45 by type
Yes, it's explicitly said in message on the first link.Alejandro_ wrote:? Does it come from an archive?
- Alejandro_
- Member
- Posts: 404
- Joined: 21 May 2003, 14:26
- Location: UK
- Contact:
Re: Soviet tank and SPG losses 1941-45 by type
OK thanks, the translator missed it then. It only refers to the author (LitBro).Yes, it's explicitly said in message on the first link.
-
- Member
- Posts: 678
- Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 16:50
Re: Soviet tank and SPG losses 1941-45 by type
I take it that these numbers:
- 783 MK-1/2/3/5/7
- 2.301 Mk-9/-11
are Canadian/UK Valentine, Churchill and Matilda tanks?
- 783 MK-1/2/3/5/7
- 2.301 Mk-9/-11
are Canadian/UK Valentine, Churchill and Matilda tanks?
- Alejandro_
- Member
- Posts: 404
- Joined: 21 May 2003, 14:26
- Location: UK
- Contact:
Re: Soviet tank and SPG losses 1941-45 by type
[/quote]are Canadian/UK Valentine, Churchill and Matilda tanks?[/quote]
I assume so. I was going to check those designations to be sure but I have been quite busy in recent days.
I assume so. I was going to check those designations to be sure but I have been quite busy in recent days.