french railway gun

Discussions on the fortifications, artillery, & rockets used by the Axis forces.
Post Reply
AIGSPB
Member
Posts: 6
Joined: 02 Jul 2008, 13:44

Re: french railway gun

#46

Post by AIGSPB » 26 Jul 2011, 19:43

Manuferey wrote:It does indeed.

In addition, the same picture also appeared on ebay.de a year ago along with another picture showing the whole gun. The caption mentioned "52 cm RUSSLAND 1941".

Only one gun remained in 1940 in the French inventory. It was used by the Germans in the siege of Leningrad and blew up on January 5, 1942 due to a defective shell. So the picture would indeed have been taken at the end of 1941.

Image

Emmanuel
Where the 53cm gun was being operated? I know the true story of demolition of an unknown heavy German "mortar" (probably railway) close to Strelna in Dec. 1941 by rockets of a single Soviet fighter I-16, piloted by Matzievich.

User avatar
AVV
Member
Posts: 3849
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 20:25
Location: Kiev, Ukraine

Re: french railway gun

#47

Post by AVV » 26 Jul 2011, 19:51

Hello!
AIGSPB wrote:I know the true story of demolition of an unknown heavy German "mortar" (probably railway) close to Strelna in Dec. 1941 by rockets of a single Soviet fighter I-16, piloted by Matzievich.
Any details? The rockets were RS-82, if I've got it right?

Best regards, Aleks


AIGSPB
Member
Posts: 6
Joined: 02 Jul 2008, 13:44

Re: french railway gun

#48

Post by AIGSPB » 26 Jul 2011, 20:07

The type of rockets is unknown to me, but these fighters (I-16) were equipped with 6 rockets each. The rockets were useful against air and surface targets, f.e. the same pilot shot down German bomber at night by these rockets.
The story is here (in Russian): http://airaces.narod.ru/all10/matsiev2.htm
Shortly - the pilot was one of the best and he was the leader of a squad in a regiment of night fighters. He hunted the mortar during long time, but without any success. Finally once he approached the position with fighter's engine switched off, so the german AA batteries were unable to hear him. He noticed the splash of firing gun, and attacked the place. He saw the huge explosion, but were not sure whether he was successful in his attack. Since that night the mortar didn't fire anymore, so this let him count the successful hit. Might it be mentioned 52cm French antiques - I don't know, but it looks like, 'cause the Germans didn't have many heavy guns at Leningrad in Dec. 1941. Here is the map of Strelna, where the fighter attacked a mortar:
O-35-12_O-36-1.jpg

User avatar
AVV
Member
Posts: 3849
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 20:25
Location: Kiev, Ukraine

Re: french railway gun

#49

Post by AVV » 26 Jul 2011, 20:15

Thanks! :D

Best regards, Aleks

jopaerya
Member
Posts: 19236
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 14:21
Location: middelburg

Re: french railway gun

#50

Post by jopaerya » 27 Jul 2011, 12:07

Hello

According to the book "Eisenbahnartillerie" the 52 cm H (E) 871 (f) was placed between Kolpino and Krasny Bor
that is a long way from the place you have mentioned . The pilots are talking about december 1941 and the
incident was on 05-01-1942 . Also the barrel is blown to pieces , that could only happen when a rocket + round
was exploded inside the barrel ??

Regards Jos

AIGSPB
Member
Posts: 6
Joined: 02 Jul 2008, 13:44

Re: french railway gun

#51

Post by AIGSPB » 29 Jul 2011, 23:33

jopaerya wrote:Hello

According to the book "Eisenbahnartillerie" the 52 cm H (E) 871 (f) was placed between Kolpino and Krasny Bor
that is a long way from the place you have mentioned . The pilots are talking about december 1941 and the
incident was on 05-01-1942 . Also the barrel is blown to pieces , that could only happen when a rocket + round
was exploded inside the barrel ??

Regards Jos
The barrel could be slightly damaged by rockets, so visually it looked unaffected, and during next opening fire the barrel could have been demolished. or not?

User avatar
Manuferey
Member
Posts: 4082
Joined: 17 May 2007, 15:52
Location: Virginia

Re: french railway gun

#52

Post by Manuferey » 30 Jul 2011, 01:11

Due to the large thickness of the barrel, I don't think that the blast from a rocket having exploded somewhere next to the barrel but not directly on it, would have created external cracks that would have weakened the barrel.

Emmanuel

Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17927
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 18:18
Location: Spain

Re: french railway gun

#53

Post by Sturm78 » 06 Aug 2011, 23:45

Hi all,

Two images from Ebay:

Image 1: I think 400mm St. Chamond Mle 1915-1916
Image 2: I think 320mm Mle 1870-84

Sturm78
Attachments
400mm St. Chamond Mle 1915-1916 french rail howitzer captured.jpg
320mm Mle 1870-84 french railgun captured.jpg

User avatar
Manuferey
Member
Posts: 4082
Joined: 17 May 2007, 15:52
Location: Virginia

Re: french railway gun

#54

Post by Manuferey » 07 Aug 2011, 00:36

Hi Sturm78,

I agree with you: the barrels match your IDs.

Emmanuel

Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17927
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 18:18
Location: Spain

Re: french railway gun

#55

Post by Sturm78 » 09 Aug 2011, 11:32

Hi all,

I think 370mm Mle 1875-79. A rare combination: a very old barrel on a much more modern carriage. 8O
Why waste the carriage with this old barrel?

Image from Ebay
Sturm78
Attachments
370mm Mle 1875-79 french railgun captured.jpg

User avatar
Manuferey
Member
Posts: 4082
Joined: 17 May 2007, 15:52
Location: Virginia

Re: french railway gun

#56

Post by Manuferey » 09 Aug 2011, 18:00

Sturm78 wrote:Why waste the carriage with this old barrel?
Sturm78
Most probably because it was much easier to build a new carriage than a new 370 mm barrel. :idea: Even an "old" model gun would still be able to send a huge 370 mm shell filled with destructive power several kilometers away: for the target at the receiving end, I don't think it mattered much how "old" the firing gun was. 8O

Emmanuel

Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17927
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 18:18
Location: Spain

Re: french railway gun

#57

Post by Sturm78 » 09 Aug 2011, 18:51

Emmanuel wrote
Most probably because it was much easier to build a new carriage than a new 370 mm barrel.

This carriage was developed for the 340mm Mle1912. I think that it would have been more logical to manufacture some more barrel of the 340mm Mle1912, which had a much better performances.

Regards Sturm78

User avatar
Manuferey
Member
Posts: 4082
Joined: 17 May 2007, 15:52
Location: Virginia

Re: french railway gun

#58

Post by Manuferey » 09 Aug 2011, 19:52

I assume that the French Army wanted to press as many heavy guns into service as fast as possible. I don't know the leadtime to manufacture barrels but due the amount of high quality steel (always in short supply) required, the complexity of steel pouring and cooling, the lengthy forming process of the barrel and liner installation, the duration of the machining, etc. it had to be several months long. :idea:
Assembly time of the carriage would have been much faster.

Emmanuel

Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17927
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 18:18
Location: Spain

Re: french railway gun

#59

Post by Sturm78 » 10 Sep 2011, 10:39

Hi all,

Two images from Ebay:

Image 1: 52cm H (E) 871 (f)
Image 2: ?? It is almost impossible to identify

Sturm78
Attachments
52cm H (E) 871f captured french rail howitzer used by germans in Leningrad.jpg
french railgun captured.jpg
french railgun captured.jpg (59.69 KiB) Viewed 1320 times

User avatar
Manuferey
Member
Posts: 4082
Joined: 17 May 2007, 15:52
Location: Virginia

Re: french railway gun

#60

Post by Manuferey » 10 Sep 2011, 17:16

Image 1: 52cm H (E) 871 (f) - I agree
Image 2: at least, it looks to me like the carriage is the "affût à glissement de 320 mm Mle 1870-81". Otherwise, I cannot recognize the exact type. The only thing we can say is that it is not a "274 mm à glissement Mle 1917".

Emmanuel

Post Reply

Return to “Fortifications, Artillery, & Rockets”