Art wrote:Not really much. See the known story of Dulag-205. There were several thousand prisoners in POWs camps located inside the pocket who suffered severe malnutrition.DavidFrankenberg wrote: Do you think Germans could afford feeding soviet POWS since they had huge difficulties to feed themselves ?
Would you count them as "rations" then ? I wd not.
By the way, do you have numbers of POW in the pocket ? They didnt seem to take prisoners at this time.
Do you have sources that deal with Pows in the pocket ? I guess some of them would be recuited as Hiwis... if they were Volkdeutsche or antisoviet, but im not even sure about that. It didnt seem that the Germans took prisoners in the pocket. Would they mind about feeding pows since they could not manage to feed themselves ?Stiltzkin wrote:Well, generally speaking the ration strength (just as well as Kopfstärke) could include: non military attachments, manpower from other military organizations, sick and wounded, as well as PoWs.Well, what you want is Tagesstärke, daily strength, with all momentarily available servicemen of the unit, which would be generally about <41% of ration strength. Then follows "Kampf-" and "Gefechtsstärke", combat and front strenghts of units.Thank you for the correction. But, concerning the "rations", i have read that this system is not very accurate to estimate the true number of german soldiers alive since many Germans didnt declare when a comrade died in order to keep on receiving his ration during the siege.
There was a croatian unit too in the pocket. That's why croatian hymn was played on radio after the surrending.