Hans von Luck: reliable accounts?
-
- Member
- Posts: 8251
- Joined: 07 May 2002, 20:40
- Location: Teesside
Re: Hans von Luck: reliable accounts?
And do we know what was in the fields around this orchard.. (Great picture) I only ask as it would take "high corn" or some other plant of similar height to mask the height of an "88" , or provide "cover" as von Luck puts it. It would be interesting to see if the surrounding agriculture supported his account. I cant tell what kind of fields they are.
-
- Member
- Posts: 8251
- Joined: 07 May 2002, 20:40
- Location: Teesside
Re: Hans von Luck: reliable accounts?
I worked out that a feature such as A is a field of corn where the outside has been harvested leaving the 'dark' block in the middle. B is also a field where the lighter L shaped strip has been cut down.
Last edited by Michael Kenny on 16 Apr 2018, 20:59, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Member
- Posts: 8251
- Joined: 07 May 2002, 20:40
- Location: Teesside
Re: Hans von Luck: reliable accounts?
The corn was never high enough to conceal a Flak 88. See this film to get an idea of the size.
http://film.iwmcollections.org.uk/record/510
You might be able to dig-in a Pak 88 but the Flak gun was just too big.
http://film.iwmcollections.org.uk/record/510
You might be able to dig-in a Pak 88 but the Flak gun was just too big.
Last edited by Michael Kenny on 17 Apr 2018, 15:28, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Hans von Luck: reliable accounts?
So it didn't matter if there was high corn ... it was not high enough to provide the kind of cover which von Luck claimed it did ... and could not hide the silhouette that an 88 had.... It would though seem to me that this is something von Luck would know if he was being untruthful, and that he would know from tactical experience . Is it possible at 80 he was confusing one or more engagement ....
-
- Member
- Posts: 8251
- Joined: 07 May 2002, 20:40
- Location: Teesside
Re: Hans von Luck: reliable accounts?
doogal wrote: Is it possible at 80 he was confusing one or more engagement ....
von Luck made the claims long before he was 80. That is a mistaken claim earlier in the thread.
Here you can hear him in the 1970s https://youtu.be/EUUHahXghI0?t=12m23s
-
- Member
- Posts: 177
- Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 19:18
- Location: Wisconsin USA
Re: Hans von Luck: reliable accounts?
According to a local resident the flak btty was deployed along the road which runs in a NE to SW direction adjacent to an orchard along Cagny's northwest side. The local dug up expended 88 shells there. The flak were not where Michael thinks they were.
In the OB West war diary there is a mention later in July or August of a Luftwaffe battery commander who was to be awarded a decoration for ground combat.
I can't produce maps, links or references now, but I will later today.
In the OB West war diary there is a mention later in July or August of a Luftwaffe battery commander who was to be awarded a decoration for ground combat.
I can't produce maps, links or references now, but I will later today.
-
- Member
- Posts: 8251
- Joined: 07 May 2002, 20:40
- Location: Teesside
Re: Hans von Luck: reliable accounts?
Sean Oliver wrote:According to a local resident the flak btty was deployed along the road which runs in a NE to SW direction adjacent to an orchard along Cagny's northwest side. The local dug up expended 88 shells there. The flak were not where Michael thinks they were.
In the OB West war diary there is a mention later in July or August of a Luftwaffe battery commander who was to be awarded a decoration for ground combat.
I can't produce maps, links or references now, but I will later today.
There were many 8.8cm Pak in the area. Of that there is no doubt. There were even 8.8cm Flak in Panzer Divisions. However von Luck clearly says it was a Luftwaffe Unit.
-
- Member
- Posts: 8251
- Joined: 07 May 2002, 20:40
- Location: Teesside
Re: Hans von Luck: reliable accounts?
This post https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic ... 6#p2133776
shows an 8.8cm Pak still in situ on a road on the NW side of Cagny in 1946
shows an 8.8cm Pak still in situ on a road on the NW side of Cagny in 1946
-
- Member
- Posts: 177
- Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 19:18
- Location: Wisconsin USA
Re: Hans von Luck: reliable accounts?
Regarding that aerial close-up:
https://forum.axishistory.com/download/ ... 417891&t=1
To me this looks like Flak equipment - not Pak. Those two single-axle carriages across the road are standard with many versions of 88 Flak (dual-purpose) pieces, but for 88 Pak?
Also, if they were Pak, wouldn't the gun's two split trails be longer?
There appears to be a cruciform under-carriage beneath the gun, again indicating Flak. But I'm not a German artillery expert, so I could be mistaken about all of this.
This position for the LW battery fits von Luck's narrative, and provides an excellent field of fire against the F+FY, whose route south (according to that old French 50:000 hatchure map from the IGN website) was atop an elevated ridgeline; Cagny is in a valley while those guns appear to have been on the slope and near the crest of the F+FY's ridge. This might've made the guns appear more or less "hull down" and hidden from the British tanks.
I'm still searching for that reference to the LW crew/officer, but my earlier post was wrong - it wasn't in OB West's KTB, it was in the 5.Pz-Armee Ia Anlagen files, and there are around 200 frames to check. T-313 rolls 420 + 421, which can be downloaded from sturmpanzer, I think.
https://forum.axishistory.com/download/ ... 417891&t=1
To me this looks like Flak equipment - not Pak. Those two single-axle carriages across the road are standard with many versions of 88 Flak (dual-purpose) pieces, but for 88 Pak?
Also, if they were Pak, wouldn't the gun's two split trails be longer?
There appears to be a cruciform under-carriage beneath the gun, again indicating Flak. But I'm not a German artillery expert, so I could be mistaken about all of this.
This position for the LW battery fits von Luck's narrative, and provides an excellent field of fire against the F+FY, whose route south (according to that old French 50:000 hatchure map from the IGN website) was atop an elevated ridgeline; Cagny is in a valley while those guns appear to have been on the slope and near the crest of the F+FY's ridge. This might've made the guns appear more or less "hull down" and hidden from the British tanks.
I'm still searching for that reference to the LW crew/officer, but my earlier post was wrong - it wasn't in OB West's KTB, it was in the 5.Pz-Armee Ia Anlagen files, and there are around 200 frames to check. T-313 rolls 420 + 421, which can be downloaded from sturmpanzer, I think.
-
- Member
- Posts: 8251
- Joined: 07 May 2002, 20:40
- Location: Teesside
Re: Hans von Luck: reliable accounts?
Pak 43Sean Oliver wrote:Regarding that aerial close-up:
https://forum.axishistory.com/download/ ... 417891&t=1
To me this looks like Flak equipment - not Pak. Those two single-axle carriages across the road are standard with many versions of 88 Flak (dual-purpose) pieces, but for 88 Pak?
Also, if they were Pak, wouldn't the gun's two split trails be longer?
There appears to be a cruciform under-carriage beneath the gun, again indicating Flak. But I'm not a German artillery expert, so I could be mistaken about all of this.
http://www.lonesentry.com/ordnance/88mm ... k-gun.html
https://www.wealdfoundation.org/Collect ... -43--88-cm
http://www.lonesentry.com/articles/ttt/ ... k-gun.html
-
- Member
- Posts: 177
- Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 19:18
- Location: Wisconsin USA
Re: Hans von Luck: reliable accounts?
Seems like it could be either, but again I'm not an artillery ID expert, obviously.
If it is Pak it doesn't affect the veracity of von Luck's account. All it tells us is that there was a Pak gun on the roadside. It may have been put there days before Goodwood because it was damaged while en route somewhere else, it may have arrived after the Flak guns were removed or destroyed, it may or may not have been in action that day, etc etc
The best place to look for info would be LW archives, but I don't think anyone's checked there yet.
Anyway, none of this disproves von Luck, so unless something more solid can be produced one way or the other, he should be given the benefit of the doubt. There has not been any solid evidence produced which undermines his credibility.
In the meantime, keep looking...
If it is Pak it doesn't affect the veracity of von Luck's account. All it tells us is that there was a Pak gun on the roadside. It may have been put there days before Goodwood because it was damaged while en route somewhere else, it may have arrived after the Flak guns were removed or destroyed, it may or may not have been in action that day, etc etc
The best place to look for info would be LW archives, but I don't think anyone's checked there yet.
Anyway, none of this disproves von Luck, so unless something more solid can be produced one way or the other, he should be given the benefit of the doubt. There has not been any solid evidence produced which undermines his credibility.
In the meantime, keep looking...
-
- Member
- Posts: 8251
- Joined: 07 May 2002, 20:40
- Location: Teesside
Re: Hans von Luck: reliable accounts?
My earlier post
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic ... 0#p2134620
is wrong. The light coloured area is standing crops. The darker area is harvested.
This shows the contrast clearly.
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic ... 0#p2134620
is wrong. The light coloured area is standing crops. The darker area is harvested.
This shows the contrast clearly.
-
- Member
- Posts: 177
- Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 19:18
- Location: Wisconsin USA
Re: Hans von Luck: reliable accounts?
I stumbled across a description in Keegan's Six Armies In Normandy which says in addition to the LW Flak battery around Cagny, v.Luck found a single Pz IV and an 88 Pak undamaged and ready for action, and ordered all of them to fire at the enemy tanks. Keegan probably sourced this from McKee's Caen: Anvil of Victory (AKA Last Round Against Rommel), an excellent and well-written book which I have somewhere, but cannot locate at the moment. The author gathered detailed accounts from participants of both sides while researching it in the early 60's, long before the deluge of Normandy books in the 80's-90's.
The Pak probably belonged to Pak-Artl.Abt.1039, an 86.A.K. unit apparently deployed with 21.Pz.D in the Cagny area
The Pak probably belonged to Pak-Artl.Abt.1039, an 86.A.K. unit apparently deployed with 21.Pz.D in the Cagny area
-
- Member
- Posts: 177
- Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 19:18
- Location: Wisconsin USA
Re: Hans von Luck: reliable accounts?
After searching Panzergruppe West’s KTB + Ia Anlagen, the most useful entry on Cagny I have found so far is on roll 420 frame 8713983 dated July 21, and says
“…rom. 86.A.K beantragt Nennung folgender 3 Pak-Richtschutzen der Artl.-Pak-Abtlg.1039 im Wermachtsbericht. Durch ihren uberlegten,kaltblutigen Einsatz haben sie die erste Welled se fdl. Panzerangriffs am 18.7 vor Cagny zum Stehen gebracht. Es schossen heirbei ab: Obergefr. Koenigs 8 Panzer, Obergefr. Ragginger: 9 Panzer, Obergefr. Schwieters: 10 Panzer.”
I think this is the entry I thought mentioned LW Flak guns in Cagny. On the microfilmed typewritten page I must’ve mistaken ‘Artl.-Pak-Abtlg’ for ’Artl.-Flak-Abtlg’.
Also mentioned in the 86th Corps area is Artl.-Pak-Abtlg.1053.
I’m still hopeful some primary evidence about this Cagny Flak battery will show up somewhere, esp LW archives. Or 86.A.K.
Oh...and I just thought of this:
How about 21 Army Group's POW/Intel reports for July 18th and days following? There might be several layers of HQ to search through: 2nd Army, VIII Corps, 11th Armd. Div. etc.
They almost certainly picked up some III.Flak personnel, and some of those POW reports from the field that I have seen are very detailed as to unit, sub-unit, location, actions on that day, etc.
“…rom. 86.A.K beantragt Nennung folgender 3 Pak-Richtschutzen der Artl.-Pak-Abtlg.1039 im Wermachtsbericht. Durch ihren uberlegten,kaltblutigen Einsatz haben sie die erste Welled se fdl. Panzerangriffs am 18.7 vor Cagny zum Stehen gebracht. Es schossen heirbei ab: Obergefr. Koenigs 8 Panzer, Obergefr. Ragginger: 9 Panzer, Obergefr. Schwieters: 10 Panzer.”
I think this is the entry I thought mentioned LW Flak guns in Cagny. On the microfilmed typewritten page I must’ve mistaken ‘Artl.-Pak-Abtlg’ for ’Artl.-Flak-Abtlg’.
Also mentioned in the 86th Corps area is Artl.-Pak-Abtlg.1053.
I’m still hopeful some primary evidence about this Cagny Flak battery will show up somewhere, esp LW archives. Or 86.A.K.
Oh...and I just thought of this:
How about 21 Army Group's POW/Intel reports for July 18th and days following? There might be several layers of HQ to search through: 2nd Army, VIII Corps, 11th Armd. Div. etc.
They almost certainly picked up some III.Flak personnel, and some of those POW reports from the field that I have seen are very detailed as to unit, sub-unit, location, actions on that day, etc.