Best Regards,
Uncle Bob


Why, everyone of them, of course.jesk, do you have a list of authenticated witnesses to atomic tests who are lying?
I read, you commented on the explosions of 1946:OpanaPointer wrote: ↑03 Sep 2018 16:33I did read attentively, I became aware of the tests in 1965. Did you read what I said?jesk wrote: ↑03 Sep 2018 16:11You did not read attentively. The first explosion was airborne.OpanaPointer wrote: ↑03 Sep 2018 15:51Oddly enough, an underwater explosion has different characteristics than an air burst. The damage on the beach would not be exacerbated by the Baker shot.
In 1946 the United States began atmospheric testing of atomic bombs in the Pacific. The first phase, known as Operation Crossroads, used Bikini Atoll for two atom bomb tests. The first test, code named Able, detonated a 21-kiloton atomic bomb at an altitude of 158 metres (520 feet) on July 1, 1946.
OpanaPointer wrote: ↑03 Sep 2018 15:51Oddly enough, an underwater explosion has different characteristics than an air burst. The damage on the beach would not be exacerbated by the Baker shot.jesk wrote: ↑03 Sep 2018 00:30The author tries to prove the fake nature of the films. Americans are able to lie no worse than the Nazis.
On July 1, 1946, the Usa blew up the "atomic bomb" Able over the Bikini Atoll. The bomb tested had a power of 21 Kt, much more than the bomb on Hiroshima (15 Kt), where the city was ravaged for several kilometers.
So here, this explosion generated huge waves, as several large warships were seriously damaged and 5 were sunk.
* The beach should have been affected by these waves.
* The wind of more than 1000 km / h would have to sleep the palm trees.
* The cabin should have been volatilized.
Yet, 24 days later, on July 25, 1946, they photograph the explosion of the bomb Baker. This is not the explosion we will analyze, but the beach from which this photo was taken.
* The floating pontoon remained intact.
* The palm leaves are exactly in the same position.
* The straw huts also stayed exactly the same.
![]()
The well-known Russian writer Zinoviev once said: irony is the defense of a weak mind from the incomprehensible. You confirm this every post, a lot of irony and nothing more.Ironmachine wrote: ↑03 Sep 2018 18:30Why, everyone of them, of course.jesk, do you have a list of authenticated witnesses to atomic tests who are lying?![]()
If you have some spare time to read the first document posted by jesk (it is time you will never recover, though, you may well spend it doing something more valuable than reading such trash) you will see the autor says that everbody is laying: the military, the scientists, the politicians, the leaders of the oil companies... I'm sure jesk fully agrees with him.
Remember that the last sentence of that article is: "Only self-employed people can talk about these topics." Translated into plain English, that means: only crazy people can believe these topics.
Regards.
Then why the irrelevancies?
Why prove physics? You get confused in a theoretical study. People analyze the consequences of Hiroshima and say there was no blast wave. Photo as after the fire, with charred trees, clear road contours. And why did not nuclear weapons be used after Japan? At least once..OpanaPointer wrote: ↑03 Sep 2018 19:22You're making the extraordinary claim, so yours is the burden of proof. So far you've just said "They're wrong!" in various wordings. The fun part is where you will prove the physics doesn't work. Make sure your crayola is sharp.
Interesting photo. Stone buildings are almost unaffected. If the bomb were detonated in a German city, its effect might not be noticed.Waleed Y. Majeed wrote: ↑03 Sep 2018 20:16Were the houses made of straw..? If so a huff and a puff could have brought it all down. No need for matches![]()
Some interesting before and after photos of Hiroshima:
https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/hirosh ... bing-1945/
waleed
These "people", do they know physics? Do they know nuclear physics? Why do you believe them and not reality?jesk wrote: ↑03 Sep 2018 20:09Why prove physics? You get confused in a theoretical study. People analyze the consequences of Hiroshima and say there was no blast wave. Photo as after the fire, with charred trees, clear road contours. And why did not nuclear weapons be used after Japan? At least once..OpanaPointer wrote: ↑03 Sep 2018 19:22You're making the extraordinary claim, so yours is the burden of proof. So far you've just said "They're wrong!" in various wordings. The fun part is where you will prove the physics doesn't work. Make sure your crayola is sharp.