King Tiger vs IS-2 (2019)
-
- Member
- Posts: 30
- Joined: 08 Jul 2019, 22:04
- Location: Canada
King Tiger vs IS-2 (2019)
I know this question has been asked to death but forumers never come to a conclusion, it turns into a statistics war that contradict each other.
So today in 2019, I bring this parley to find out if we have come to a conclusion.
I assume both could annihilate each other at certain distances but would the KT have an advantage from long range without the need of an APCR round?
So today in 2019, I bring this parley to find out if we have come to a conclusion.
I assume both could annihilate each other at certain distances but would the KT have an advantage from long range without the need of an APCR round?
Last edited by ww2armchairhistorian on 09 Jul 2019, 22:19, edited 1 time in total.
Re: King Tiger vs IS-2 (2019)
That would require a thorough analysis, which usually takes a long time. There is a large compendium of literature and articles on both AFVs (Jentz and Spielberger are considered the experts on German tanks, while you can find decent articles on the IS-2 on the warspot.ru site https://warspot.ru/12831-malaya-moderni ... hogo-tanka).I know this question has been asked to death but forumers never come to a conclusion, it turns into statistics war that contradict each other.
So today in 2019, I bring this parley to find out if we have come to a conclusion.
I assume both could annihilate each other at certain distances but would the KT have an advantage from long range without the need of an APCR round?
It would be rather complicated to measure their effectiveness based on the little information we have (lab vs field conditions, paper characteristics can be somewhat artificial), as you will not find many occassions in which they met on the battlefield. Afterall, tanks did not really joust. The image of dashing and dueling tanks is not WWII, that is just the image of the war you know from movies and games, war assets have various tasks. It depends on the interaction of all other arms of the forces. You would have to make an analysis of crew performances, mobility/automotive performances (MMP, step, gradients, revs, torque, ranges, average and top speeds, turn radii etc. even the crew comfort is often ignored) and protective layers (from firing trials), optics, projectile qualities, firing methods (stadimetric based battlesight aim), first strike penetration and destruction capabilities (maintenance and repair services should be mentioned as well).
With that said, (Solistice) comes into my mind. Hit and kill probabilities are also two different things, just because a tank has the (theoretical) potential to knock out another tank at large distances, this does not necessarily translate into the ability to reliably engage the enemy on equal terms (FCE, RoF, initiative etc.). The IS-2 was a slow firing, fortification buster.
There are reports on engagements between Hornets and IS-2s, as well as tests conducted for the OKW.
viewtopic.php?f=47&t=221644&p=2084692&h ... t#p2084692
-
- Member
- Posts: 606
- Joined: 09 Sep 2008, 09:05
- Location: Russia, St. Petersburg
Re: King Tiger vs IS-2 (2019)
It's simplification. IS-2 in the Red Army were an anti-(heavy)tank device.
There is no waste, there are reserves (Slogan of German Army in World Wars)
-
- Member
- Posts: 30
- Joined: 08 Jul 2019, 22:04
- Location: Canada
Re: King Tiger vs IS-2 (2019)
I understand that most tank engagements were mostly not tank vs tank battles. My question is, from all the information we have (where contradictions occur) what's the general consensus amongst ww2 enthusiasts? is it still split 50/50 or do most agree that the KT: as a tank hunter that has a faster firing rate, enough power to pierce the IS-2 at 1000m, better accuracy and basically the better gun, would defeat most of the times the IS-2 which is a breakthrough tank meant for destroying fortifications?
Re: King Tiger vs IS-2 (2019)
Of course, but thats by the distribution of the primary targets.It's simplification. IS-2 in the Red Army were an anti-(heavy)tank device.
Re: King Tiger vs IS-2 (2019)
In the Kubinka tank evaluations, they assigned combat ratings to various AFVs and the Panther scored significantly higher than a IS-2M. We would need to quantify the Royal Tiger, to say something about its worth.I understand that most tank engagements were mostly not tank vs tank battles. My question is, from all the information we have (where contradictions occur) what's the general consensus amongst ww2 enthusiasts? is it still split 50/50 or do most agree that the KT: as a tank hunter that has a faster firing rate, enough power to pierce the IS-2 at 1000m, better accuracy and basically the better gun, would defeat most of the times the IS-2 which is a breakthrough tank meant for destroying fortifications?
Last edited by Stiltzkin on 09 Jul 2019, 22:13, edited 1 time in total.
Re: King Tiger vs IS-2 (2019)
There are combat reports/combat accounts among the Tiger tank/PzWaffe literature- the IS-2 was not superior to the Tiger II in tank to tank combat due to its extremely low rate of fire.
+
https://www.amazon.com/King-Tiger-2-Ope ... way&sr=8-1
+
https://www.amazon.com/King-Tiger-2-Ope ... way&sr=8-1
-
- Member
- Posts: 30
- Joined: 08 Jul 2019, 22:04
- Location: Canada
Re: King Tiger vs IS-2 (2019)
Nice graph, backs up my claim.Stiltzkin wrote: ↑10 Jul 2019, 01:36Here is the data on dispersion.better accuracy
viewtopic.php?f=47&t=228421&hilit=accuracy&start=30
-
- Member
- Posts: 30
- Joined: 08 Jul 2019, 22:04
- Location: Canada
Re: King Tiger vs IS-2 (2019)
Not surprised that reports show the KT performed better in tank to tank combat, it is a tank hunter. It's disappointing to see when forumers say that IS-2 is equal in tank to tank combat because of that famous Russian testing on a KT, where's pierced all around.Cult Icon wrote: ↑09 Jul 2019, 22:11There are combat reports/combat accounts among the Tiger tank/PzWaffe literature- the IS-2 was not superior to the Tiger II in tank to tank combat due to its extremely low rate of fire.
+
https://www.amazon.com/King-Tiger-2-Ope ... way&sr=8-1
Re: King Tiger vs IS-2 (2019)
German evaluation from July 1944 stated that in terms of armor protection and penetration Tiger I with KwK 36 was inferior to IS 122 whereas Tiger II was far superior. Which was, however, based on theoretical penetration tables rather than actual trials. Also this superiority was only present at longer distances.
Re: King Tiger vs IS-2 (2019)
A graph of comparative armor penetration:
German evaluation is quite consistent with Soviet trials where turret front of the Tiger II was penetrated by a 122-mm round from a distance of 1000-1500 meters.
German evaluation is quite consistent with Soviet trials where turret front of the Tiger II was penetrated by a 122-mm round from a distance of 1000-1500 meters.
Re: King Tiger vs IS-2 (2019)
Here are the evaluations from the Heeresversuchsanstalt Kummersdorf (Verskraft) from 1945.
-
- Member
- Posts: 606
- Joined: 09 Sep 2008, 09:05
- Location: Russia, St. Petersburg
Re: King Tiger vs IS-2 (2019)
Primary targets for IS-2 were german heavy tanks/SP guns (if it appears in a battlefield). The IS-2 heavy regiments in tank/mech. corps served as anti-tank reserve.
Characteristic argument from Fedorenko about formation new heavy tank brigades (20th November 1944):
For the best and reliable organization of the struggle against the enemy’s heavy tanks, it is possible to additionally complete another four tank brigades in the month of December.
Full document in Russian.
Докладная записка Народному комиссару обороны И.В. Сталину
Докладываю:
Во исполнение Вашего приказания к 5 декабря с. г. будет готова одна тяжелая танковая бригада ИС в составе двух полков по 21 танку ИС в каждом и одного полка ИСУ-122 - 21 установка.
Всего в бригаде - 65 боевых машин.
Для лучшей и надежной организации борьбы с тяжелыми танками противника имеется возможность дополнительно укомплектовать в декабре месяце еще 4 танковых бригады.
Таким образом, к 1 января 1945 г. в резерве Ставки будет состоять 5 тяжелых танковых бригад ИС - 15 полков.
Прошу вашего решения.
Командующий БТ и МВ КА
маршал бронетанковых войск Я. Федоренко
There is no waste, there are reserves (Slogan of German Army in World Wars)
Re: King Tiger vs IS-2 (2019)
Well the document can state what it wants, do you have the distribution of engaged targets by heavy regiments (or alternatively their munition expenditure)?Primary targets for IS-2 were german heavy tanks/SP guns (if it appears in a battlefield). The IS-2 heavy regiments in tank/mech. corps served as anti-tank reserve.