schwere Panzerabteilung and the Panzer IIIN
schwere Panzerabteilung and the Panzer IIIN
Its my understanding that initially the schwere Panzerabteilung were allocated the P IIIN's to supplement the Tigers, but that this stopped at some point in 44, but I am unclear as to exactly when this happened, were they still in service with the schwere Panzerabteilung that were in Normandy for example, I know 501 had them in Tunisia, but after that...
- Ironmachine
- Member
- Posts: 5822
- Joined: 07 Jul 2005, 11:50
- Location: Spain
Re: schwere Panzerabteilung and the Panzer IIIN
Officially, the Panzer III was dropped from the schwere Panzerabteilungen on 5 March 1943, when General Staff issued a new T/O for the heavy tank company and the heavy tank battalion with no Panzer IIIs. By that time, five battalions of Tigers had been already created (501st to 505th), that had to change to the new organization. This was accomplished during 1943, and by 1944 no Tiger battalion had Panzer IIIs tanks.
Re: schwere Panzerabteilung and the Panzer IIIN
Ok, Thank you, what then Became of the N's, who was using them, I seam to recall them being referenced in Sicily and Normandy, and Italy, but I am just going on memoryIronmachine wrote: ↑13 Jul 2019, 20:41Officially, the Panzer III was dropped from the schwere Panzerabteilungen on 5 March 1943, when General Staff issued a new T/O for the heavy tank company and the heavy tank battalion with no Panzer IIIs. By that time, five battalions of Tigers had been already created (501st to 505th), that had to change to the new organization. This was accomplished during 1943, and by 1944 no Tiger battalion had Panzer IIIs tanks.
- Ironmachine
- Member
- Posts: 5822
- Joined: 07 Jul 2005, 11:50
- Location: Spain
Re: schwere Panzerabteilung and the Panzer IIIN
Can't help with that, I don't know the fate of the Panzer III tanks retired from the heavy tank battalions.
However, it should be noted they were not always N's. The K.St.N. did not specify any model of Panzer III, and different marks of the Panzer III were provided for the schwere panzerabteilungen.
For example:
However, it should be noted they were not always N's. The K.St.N. did not specify any model of Panzer III, and different marks of the Panzer III were provided for the schwere panzerabteilungen.
For example:
https://panzeriiilordofblitzkreig.blogs ... anies.htmlIn this period, the type of Panzer IIIs issued (or in operation) were:
s.PzAbt 501 - 25 PzIII 75mm
s.PzAbt 504 - 19 PzIII 50mm
s.PzAbt 503 - 25 PzIII 75mm
s.PzAbt 505 - 25 PzIII 50mm
s.PzAbt 502 - 9 PzIII 50mm, 17 PzIII 75mm
s.PzKp GD - 10 PzIII 50mm
s.SS-PzKp - each 10 PzIII 50mm
Re: schwere Panzerabteilung and the Panzer IIIN
Interesting, I thought the intent was to provide support to the Tigers, and that the N with its 75 mm was better suited to that, and as the the HEAT thread on the subject has shown would by this time have a respectable performance to provide some measure of self protection against enemy armour, I wonder if the inclusion of the 50 mm in some formations was simply because there were not enough N’s on hand
-
- Member
- Posts: 3370
- Joined: 19 Sep 2008, 14:44
Re: schwere Panzerabteilung and the Panzer IIIN
Didn't one of the Army Tiger Battalions convert its Pz IIIM to bridging vehicles and receive a reprmand from its Army HQ for not passing the vehicles on to another unit ? I can't remember which battalion and I can't get at the book which references the incident.
Alan
Re: schwere Panzerabteilung and the Panzer IIIN
Yes Alan it was s.Pz.Abt 505 during Zitadelle. ( PT No.3-5)
-
- Member
- Posts: 3370
- Joined: 19 Sep 2008, 14:44
Re: schwere Panzerabteilung and the Panzer IIIN
Almost all Panzer-Division's employed III N's at various times between 1942 and 1945:
Pz.Div.: 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., 11., 12., 13.(?), 14., 15., 16., 17., 18., 19., 20., 21., 22., 23., 24., 25., 26., 27., 155. Res., 179. Res., 233. Res., 273. Res., Hermann Göring, Großdeutschland, Pz.Lehr, Totenkopf, Wiking, Norwegen
Inf.Div.(mot)/Pz.Gren.Div.: 16., 29., 90.
Regards
Ciao
Re: schwere Panzerabteilung and the Panzer IIIN
WoW, Ok, TY !DirkAH wrote: ↑14 Jul 2019, 19:18Almost all Panzer-Division's employed III N's at various times between 1942 and 1945:
Pz.Div.: 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., 11., 12., 13.(?), 14., 15., 16., 17., 18., 19., 20., 21., 22., 23., 24., 25., 26., 27., 155. Res., 179. Res., 233. Res., 273. Res., Hermann Göring, Großdeutschland, Pz.Lehr, Totenkopf, Wiking, Norwegen
Inf.Div.(mot)/Pz.Gren.Div.: 16., 29., 90.
Regards
-
- Member
- Posts: 3370
- Joined: 19 Sep 2008, 14:44
Re: schwere Panzerabteilung and the Panzer IIIN
I'd have to question that Panzer Lehr ever used Panzer IIIN.
Alan
Re: schwere Panzerabteilung and the Panzer IIIN
6. and 7./Pz.Lehr-Rgt. each reported a single III L/24 in February 1944 according to Martin Block. Presumably training tanks from Pz.Tr.Schule Bergen, but still part of Pz.Lehr-Div. for a short period of time.
Ciao
-
- Member
- Posts: 3370
- Joined: 19 Sep 2008, 14:44
Re: schwere Panzerabteilung and the Panzer IIIN
As I recall, the Tiger abts had to give back their Pz. IIIs when the kstn organisation changed. They were taken away and given to regular Pz. Divs.
s505 was told to put the turrets back on those three(?) Pz. IIIs it had deturreted and turned into bridge carriers, then give the tanks back.
s505 was told to put the turrets back on those three(?) Pz. IIIs it had deturreted and turned into bridge carriers, then give the tanks back.
Re: schwere Panzerabteilung and the Panzer IIIN
Better to beg for forgiveness than to ask for permission. That's pretty good. Give 'em credit for thinking, though.
The order was probably accompanied with a "...And that's coming out of your pay!!"
Remain yourself, in spite of all the mighty do.
Goethe
Goethe