German opinions on Panther tank or crew experience.

Discussions on the vehicles used by the Axis forces. Hosted by Christian Ankerstjerne
Post Reply
Ulater
Member
Posts: 246
Joined: 09 Mar 2015, 20:36
Location: USA

Re: German opinions on Panther tank or crew experience.

#91

Post by Ulater » 01 Oct 2018, 16:49

Image

Seems somewhat relevant. Related to the 503rd Heavy tank battalion.

Yoozername
Member
Posts: 2615
Joined: 25 Apr 2006, 16:58
Location: Colorado

Re: German opinions on Panther tank or crew experience.

#92

Post by Yoozername » 01 Oct 2018, 19:10

Thee Panther-Fibel gives a German 'opinion ' as of mid-1944. The diagrams clearly show the Germans are aware of the vulnerability of the side armor.

http://bilder.zib-militaria.de/buttons/Pantherfibel.pdf

@Ulater, I would expect the Panther transmission repair to be somewhat quicker and to be able to be performed at a less than 'Vienna' level. The Tiger I turret had to be removed to perform that job (along with much of the interior). The Panther could go through the removable plate above the driver/radio operator. Not exactly easy, but it was done.

See pics in this thread...

viewtopic.php?f=47&t=234696&start=120
Last edited by Yoozername on 01 Oct 2018, 19:21, edited 2 times in total.


Yoozername
Member
Posts: 2615
Joined: 25 Apr 2006, 16:58
Location: Colorado

Re: German opinions on Panther tank or crew experience.

#93

Post by Yoozername » 01 Oct 2018, 19:18

Alejandro_ wrote:
01 Oct 2018, 14:41
Anyway, hope is that the thread does not get off topic and speculative...in that regards, another GERMAN report that stays on topic...
Interesting. Do you have a source (book) for it?
Do you want the original German document? I can probably find it.

Ulater
Member
Posts: 246
Joined: 09 Mar 2015, 20:36
Location: USA

Re: German opinions on Panther tank or crew experience.

#94

Post by Ulater » 01 Oct 2018, 19:33

Yoozername wrote:
01 Oct 2018, 19:10
Thee Panther-Fibel gives a German 'opinion ' as of mid-1944. The diagrams clearly show the Germans are aware of the vulnerability of the side armor.

http://bilder.zib-militaria.de/buttons/Pantherfibel.pdf

@Ulater, I would expect the Panther transmission repair to be somewhat quicker and to be able to be performed at a less than 'Vienna' level. The Tiger I turret had to be removed to perform that job (along with much of the interior). The Panther could go through the removable plate above the driver/radio operator. Not exactly easy, but it was done.

See pics in this thread...

viewtopic.php?f=47&t=234696&start=120
Image

More relevant. Part of that french report on Panthers used in Spielberger's book.

User avatar
Gorque
Member
Posts: 1662
Joined: 11 Feb 2009, 19:20
Location: Clocktown

Re: German opinions on Panther tank or crew experience.

#95

Post by Gorque » 02 Oct 2018, 03:49

Out of curiosity, what was the average life of an AFV in WW2. Did an an AFV see 2000, 3000 or 5000 km? I'm asking this in earnest as I do not know. 5000 km is ~ 3000 miles? From New York to San Fran? No? Was that a reasonable expectation for an AFV then?

critical mass
Member
Posts: 740
Joined: 13 Jun 2017, 15:53
Location: central Europe

Re: German opinions on Panther tank or crew experience.

#96

Post by critical mass » 03 Oct 2018, 14:37

According to Coombs, British tank production and the War Economy 1934-1945 (London/New York 2013), p.90:
average mls before major drive train breakdown / replacement of engine under british environmental conditions:

CRUSADER 1942: 400mls
VALENTINE 1942: 950mls
CHURCHILL 1942: 500mls
MATHILDA II 1942: 800mls
COVENANTER 1942: 600mls

Michael Kenny
Member
Posts: 8251
Joined: 07 May 2002, 20:40
Location: Teesside

Re: German opinions on Panther tank or crew experience.

#97

Post by Michael Kenny » 23 May 2019, 18:38

Report on a Panther recovery in Normandy by No. 1 Canadian Section AFV (T):
August Appendix (u) 982CVCVC-vertVBVB.jpg
Map overview:
7F-4  St Pierre Sur Dives(2)BB.jpg
Panther location:
7F-4  St Pierre Sur Dives(2) G.jpg

Michael Kenny
Member
Posts: 8251
Joined: 07 May 2002, 20:40
Location: Teesside

Re: German opinions on Panther tank or crew experience.

#98

Post by Michael Kenny » 29 May 2019, 02:00

This is the Panther referred to in the post above
Panther Map ref 450709  74-F (1).jpg

Yoozername
Member
Posts: 2615
Joined: 25 Apr 2006, 16:58
Location: Colorado

Re: German opinions on Panther tank or crew experience.

#99

Post by Yoozername » 29 May 2019, 17:11


Michael Kenny
Member
Posts: 8251
Joined: 07 May 2002, 20:40
Location: Teesside

Re: German opinions on Panther tank or crew experience.

#100

Post by Michael Kenny » 29 May 2019, 22:11

Appendix in The War Diary of 1 Canadian Section AFV(T) for August 1944 relating to the shipping of a recently captured Bergpanther to the UK
August Appendix (b) 958 Begpanther.jpg
Bergpanther.jpg

Paul Lakowski
Member
Posts: 1441
Joined: 30 Apr 2003, 06:16
Location: Canada

Re: German opinions on Panther tank or crew experience.

#101

Post by Paul Lakowski » 30 May 2019, 00:19

Yoozername wrote:
29 May 2019, 17:11
A Soviet perspective....

https://warspot.ru/11907-strashnee-koshki-zverya-net
Shot groupings invalidate results but do confirm multiple impacts should increase penetration success.

Yoozername
Member
Posts: 2615
Joined: 25 Apr 2006, 16:58
Location: Colorado

Re: German opinions on Panther tank or crew experience.

#102

Post by Yoozername » 30 May 2019, 21:18

Paul Lakowski wrote:
30 May 2019, 00:19
Yoozername wrote:
29 May 2019, 17:11
A Soviet perspective....

https://warspot.ru/11907-strashnee-koshki-zverya-net
Shot groupings invalidate results but do confirm multiple impacts should increase penetration success.
It is interesting that the 85mm had little chance of penetrating the hull. Albeit with weld cracks.

delete013
Member
Posts: 32
Joined: 21 Aug 2018, 12:41
Location: Germany

Re: German opinions on Panther tank or crew experience.

#103

Post by delete013 » 17 Dec 2019, 17:26

So if I summarise some of the reports stated here. Side vs. front vs. all hits:

[Vehicle type | no. of veh. | front hits | side hits | rear | side vs front hit share | side hit share]

1. The ORO-T-117 (Appendix E) states (supposedly, taken from here http://sturgeonshouse.ipbhost.com/topic ... s-in-wwii/):

Pz5/6 | 30 | 30 | 67 | 1 | 0.69 | 0.68
Pz3/4 | 59 | 56 | 64 | 8 | 0.53 | 0.5

Hits include hand held rockets

2. The ORG report from critical mass (NW Europe, June 1944-July 1945, chapter 10):
Pz5 | 22 | 17 | 33 | 5 | 0.66 | 0.6 (! turret hits split evenly !)
M4 | 40 | 21 | 40 | 6 | 0.66 | 0.6

3. Analysis of 75 mm Sherman Tank Casualties. Report No. 12 (Canadian Military History)
M4 | 45 | 19 | 36 | 10 | 0.66 | 0.55

Average for side hits is 0.59, median 0.6 (0.58 and 0.58 respectively, if the unclear case under (2.) is removed). Ratio between front and side hits was 1 : 1.13-2.23. Hence for every front hit come 1.5 side hits if median is used.
Michael Kenny wrote:
18 Sep 2018, 21:37
The revelation that 75% of hits on a Panther penetrated was a surprise to many.
Supposedly one assumes that all side and rear hits on a panther are a kill. Assuming a rear hit share is 6% (highest estimate for given German stats) then 0.6 + 0.06 = 66%. To satisfy the 75% penetration share then at least 22,5% of frontal hits had to succeed. This means about 1 out of 4 projectiles go through panther's front.

To note is that this data does not include the context of tactics used, battle ratios, information asymmetry, equipment availability during combat etc.

Another interesting information is the confirmation of the disparaging number of hits found on the vehicles of the respectable sides.

3.27 for Pz5/6 mix
2.17 for Pz3/4 mix
2.05 for Pz5 (hence, tigers probably pushed the first stat up)
1.68 and 1.44 for M4

Fazit, I draw the following conclusions:
1. Is 22,5% chance to pen panther's front realistic? If it is, then the 75% is valid under equal all other conditions and as the worst case. It does however not include the surviving tanks. Together it constitutes most likely a false claim.
2. Decision to focus the armour on the front side in absolute terms does not provide good protection for all the most exposed surfaces, i.e. front and sides. Share of side hits is considerably high 30% per side. This reaffirms the idea that panther's could not fight with exposed flanks without adequate support. It is a subject for another discussion, if such a trait was possible in ww2.
3. In relative terms is the use of well armoured front plate by far the most cost efficient solution. The 40% share of frontal hits, comparably high costs in covering the sides of a vehicle and the comparison with amoured protection of WAllied vehicles, show that panther's armour was good and by far the best in war for a medium tank. This is consideration given with assumption of equality of all other factors. Inclusion of additional disadvantages with which Germans had to fight would imo only improve the results of the vehicle's armour.
4. When evaluating survivability of ww2 tanks, besides including the factor of recoverability of vehicles and availability of spare part, the inclusion of the hits required/noted on vehicles should be considered. More hits mean more chances for a damage of an essential component, damage of armour or "lucky hits".
Last edited by delete013 on 18 Dec 2019, 10:15, edited 4 times in total.

delete013
Member
Posts: 32
Joined: 21 Aug 2018, 12:41
Location: Germany

Re: German opinions on Panther tank or crew experience.

#104

Post by delete013 » 17 Dec 2019, 17:52

Mobius wrote:
15 Sep 2018, 03:45
Oh right, it is 182 penetrations. My bad didn't add the turret. 140 scoops vs 322 total hits is a failure rate of 43.5%.
Image
What I would wonder about this statistic is what exactly was counted under scoops. Stuart tanks have namely a remarkably high statistic for hull, 6 pens and 6 scoops. I kind of doubt that their armour could stop any usual AT-weapon that Germans used.

Peasant
Member
Posts: 798
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 18:21
Location: Ukraine

Re: German opinions on Panther tank or crew experience.

#105

Post by Peasant » 17 Dec 2019, 23:18

delete013 wrote:
17 Dec 2019, 17:52

What I would wonder about this statistic is what exactly was counted under scoops. Stuart tanks have namely a remarkably high statistic for hull, 6 pens and 6 scoops. I kind of doubt that their armour could stop any usual AT-weapon that Germans used.
I believe those could be from the german 2cm flak/kwk guns, their frontal armor was quite safe from them and the side armour from beyond 500m, without use of APCR rounds.

Post Reply

Return to “The Ron Klages Panzer & other vehicles Section”