When 79% are on the side or rear. Well obviously its "75% of hits on knocked out Panthers penetrated." No count of hits on just runners.Michael Kenny wrote: ↑04 Feb 2020, 08:24Thanks for referencing the fact that that 42 of 56 (75%) of the hits on a Panther penetrated.Yoozername wrote: ↑04 Feb 2020, 03:53If you read the survey, you would note that.....................Page 204...........says 42 penetrations out of 56 shots..
Wittmann obsession.
Re: Wittmann obsession.
-
- Member
- Posts: 8251
- Joined: 07 May 2002, 20:40
- Location: Teesside
-
- Member
- Posts: 2615
- Joined: 25 Apr 2006, 16:58
- Location: Colorado
Re: Wittmann obsession.
Not on 'A Panther'....a small sample of 22 panthers.Michael Kenny wrote: ↑04 Feb 2020, 08:24Thanks for referencing the fact that that 42 of 56 (75%) of the hits on a Panther penetrated.Yoozername wrote: ↑04 Feb 2020, 03:53If you read the survey, you would note that.....................Page 204...........says 42 penetrations out of 56 shots..
So, why don't you say 100% of panzer IVs were penetrated?
Thanks for the laughs. But, I have been told that laughing at people's poor attempts at maths is not that civil. But, in some cases, especially if they posture themselves as some sort of authority (or author); I can't help myself. And if THEY are OBSESSIVE, YET claim OTHERS are obsessive, THEN we are in a whole new realm of confustipation.
-
- Member
- Posts: 8251
- Joined: 07 May 2002, 20:40
- Location: Teesside
Re: Wittmann obsession.
Not on 'A Panther'....a small sample of 22 panthers.
Thank you for the help with my grammar.
That aside 75% of strikes on a Panther penetrated
-
- Member
- Posts: 2615
- Joined: 25 Apr 2006, 16:58
- Location: Colorado
Re: Wittmann obsession.
It is not your grammar that is in dire need of help.Michael Kenny wrote: ↑04 Feb 2020, 20:26
Not on 'A Panther'....a small sample of 22 panthers.
Thank you for the help with my grammar.
That aside 75% of strikes on a Panther penetrated
Re: Wittmann obsession.
Hi guys
So the correct statement is:
22 Panthers were examined, 56 shots were identified of which 42 had penetrated - that is 75% of the shots identified had penetrated.
Or 75% of the shots that hit the Panthers examined penetrated.
Regards
John
So the correct statement is:
22 Panthers were examined, 56 shots were identified of which 42 had penetrated - that is 75% of the shots identified had penetrated.
Or 75% of the shots that hit the Panthers examined penetrated.
Regards
John
-
- Member
- Posts: 2615
- Joined: 25 Apr 2006, 16:58
- Location: Colorado
Re: Wittmann obsession.
I believe that is not only an accurate statement, but one I have been saying. Perhaps you can help MK with the reading of the report?
But wait! There's more that I agree with... (b)...if you can read it
But wait! There's more that I agree with... (b)...if you can read it
In addition to that....I suspect the 'sample' is actually from the first 'phase' of the study. That is, when the Panthers were actually attacking more.The full advantage is certainly greater than that shown in the table