Request for Identification of SS-officers

[J. Duncan]

Thanks Andrey. I saw this on a memorabilia sharing blog site - I thought it was him, but whoever was showing their stuff didn’t identify or may not have known who it was (or did and decided not to reveal)

[Arcame77]

Hi,
Who is the officer with Hitler?
Even I do not which department he is from, Because I think his uniform looks strange.
The source is on the pic.
Thanks

ttvon

# 46 Mensaje por ttvon » 05 Mar 2013, 08:20
# 69 Mensaje por ttvon » 02 Sep 2014, 12:48
Creo que el que aparece en estas fotos es el mismo. y que habéis indicado que podría ser Karl Gotthard-Walter Weichelt

Karl Gotthard-Walter Weichelt.jpg (23.19 KiB) Viewed 1136 times

[ttvon]

I am not sure.
But # 46 and # 69 looks like different men.


ttvon

[Michal78]

Who is SS officer next to H.Frank and K.Blome? His face is very familiar to me...
Michal

[Andrey]

Michal,

It`s SS-Of. Dr. Friedrich (Fritz) Siebert (SS №268998).

Andrey.

[Michal78]

Thank you, Andrey. Appreciate it.
Michal

[mil-archive]

mil-archive I guess it´s rather you who should be able to tell us who those men are when you´re holding a copyright for this image. Who took that image and where, please? TIA.

Just saw this now. I own the copyright because I bought the albums, scanned the images and put some online. If I knew the names I would not be asking.

This is from a 2 album set belonging to Herbert Dietrich, who went through Czechoslovakia, Poland and ended up working for Der Beauftragte Reichskommissars Für Provinz Noord Holland Rev.-Leutnant d.SchP. Boldt, (Kenau park Haarlem). This image doesn't fit with the rest however and is from the SS Stage of his career in South france 1943-1944. These 2 men are unknown to me but identifying them would help find out more about the mans later career.

Herbert-Dietrich-1-1938-1944-0319.JPG

[Andrey]

I`m sorry BUT.
Why you re-post the same photo here again???
We all remember this photo...
There is no answer to your question yet. Where is the logic of placing it here again?
If you think that the number of postings of the same photo affects a positive result, - then you are mistaken...

viewtopic.php?f=38&t=146826&start=1890

Andrey.

[mil-archive]

I`m sorry BUT.
Why you re-post the same photo here again???
We all remember this photo...
There is no answer to your question yet. Where is the logic of placing it here again?
If you think that the number of postings of the same photo affects a positive result, - then you are mistaken...

viewtopic.php?f=38&t=146826&start=1890

Andrey.

I made a post in beginning February which someone replied to and I missed at that time. I didn't expect anyone to have to scroll back to the February part of the thread to know what it was in relation to and so that's why, when I replied last night I re-uploaded the same image so that anyone seeing it now would know what it referred to.

[Andrey]

I`m sorry BUT.
Why you re-post the same photo here again???
We all remember this photo...
There is no answer to your question yet. Where is the logic of placing it here again?
If you think that the number of postings of the same photo affects a positive result, - then you are mistaken...

viewtopic.php?f=38&t=146826&start=1890

Andrey.

I made a post in beginning February which someone replied to and I missed at that time. I didn't expect anyone to have to scroll back to the February part of the thread to know what it was in relation to and so that's why, when I replied last night I re-uploaded the same image so that anyone seeing it now would know what it referred to.

It was enough for you to find your photo in this thread and give the link again.
It's not hard.
Judging by your logic, after a while you will post the same photo again here?
Insanity in my opinion, sorry...

Andrey.

[mil-archive]

...
Judging by your logic, after a while you will post the same photo again here?
Insanity in my opinion, sorry...

Andrey.

That's incorrect. I've been posting here about 12 years and that I recall that was the first time I have ever posted the same image twice and for the reasons given (I missed a directly reply to my post over 3 months ago and didn't expect anyone to have to go scrolling back through the thread to be able to follow). I wouldn't call that insanity, if anything this is it's an over reaction on your part in my view.

[Andrey]

...
Judging by your logic, after a while you will post the same photo again here?
Insanity in my opinion, sorry...

Andrey.

That's incorrect. I've been posting here about 12 years and that I recall that was the first time I have ever posted the same image twice and for the reasons given (I missed a directly reply to my post over 3 months ago and didn't expect anyone to have to go scrolling back through the thread to be able to follow). I wouldn't call that insanity, if anything this is it's an over reaction on your part in my view.

No. Just normal reaktion as a moderator.
Nothing personal.
... and "12 years" has nothing to do with it.

Andrey.

[history1]

mil-archive I guess it´s rather you who should be able to tell us who those men are when you´re holding a copyright for this image. Who took that image and where, please? TIA.

Just saw this now. I own the copyright because I bought the albums, scanned the images and put some online. If I knew the names I would not be asking.

This is from a 2 album set belonging to Herbert Dietrich, who went through Czechoslovakia, Poland and ended up working for Der Beauftragte Reichskommissars Für Provinz Noord Holland Rev.-Leutnant d.SchP. Boldt.
[...]

Some info about the copyright laws in Ireland:

In Ireland, and throughout the European Union, copyright lasts for the creators lifetime plus a further 70 years. [...] A common misconception is that the owner of an artwork automatically owns the copyright in the work. Copyright remains with the artist even when the physical artwork is sold. The only way to transfer copyright ownership is in writing.

Source: https://ivaro.ie/copyright/
It seems that you´re mistaken that you hold the copyright.

[mil-archive]

mil-archive I guess it´s rather you who should be able to tell us who those men are when you´re holding a copyright for this image. Who took that image and where, please? TIA.

Just saw this now. I own the copyright because I bought the albums, scanned the images and put some online. If I knew the names I would not be asking.

This is from a 2 album set belonging to Herbert Dietrich, who went through Czechoslovakia, Poland and ended up working for Der Beauftragte Reichskommissars Für Provinz Noord Holland Rev.-Leutnant d.SchP. Boldt.
[...]

Some info about the copyright laws in Ireland:

In Ireland, and throughout the European Union, copyright lasts for the creators lifetime plus a further 70 years. [...] A common misconception is that the owner of an artwork automatically owns the copyright in the work. Copyright remains with the artist even when the physical artwork is sold. The only way to transfer copyright ownership is in writing.

Source: https://ivaro.ie/copyright/
It seems that you´re mistaken that you hold the copyright.

This 'conversation' crops up periodically goes around in circles and then everyone dies of boredom in the meantime. Most ww2 forums have multiple threads on this topic including this one. This particular thread is for a completely different purpose.

Usually the 2 sides of this conversation are on the one side people who spend the time and energy and money to collect and preserve historical images/photographs. Then on the other hand people who think they can own anything anyone else places on the internet for any purpose.

I have no interest in going any further on this topic with you as life is too short.

- -

If anyone does happen to know who the 2 men in the above photo (back a page) are I would be interested to hear ! Thanks for checking.

[ttvon]

Hi,
Who is the SS-Sturmbannführer(124) in Berlin in 1943?


ttvon