Electric-drive BB's - tactical use of astern?
- TheMarcksPlan
- Banned
- Posts: 3255
- Joined: 15 Jan 2019, 23:32
- Location: USA
Electric-drive BB's - tactical use of astern?
Wondering whether the astern-power capabilities of electro-BB's were ever intended for tactical use. Was it possible and/or intended, for example, simply to reverse direction (at somewhat-lower speed) rather than executing a full 180-degree turn? I could see this being useful under certain battle conditions. A full turn is time-consuming and the guns are mostly useless during it, whereas it's probably feasible to program a firing solution during slowing/acceleration on a constant (then instantaneously flipped) ship bearing.
Given that not all "Standards" were electro-drive, I could also see the tactical development not having been considered for the battle line.
Likewise, could an electro-BB use reverse on one outer shaft to decrease its tactical turn radius? I could see problems caused by asymmetric propeller thrust after the execution of such a movement (prior to full-ahead being regained).
Given that not all "Standards" were electro-drive, I could also see the tactical development not having been considered for the battle line.
Likewise, could an electro-BB use reverse on one outer shaft to decrease its tactical turn radius? I could see problems caused by asymmetric propeller thrust after the execution of such a movement (prior to full-ahead being regained).
https://twitter.com/themarcksplan
https://www.reddit.com/r/AxisHistoryForum/
https://medium.com/counterfactualww2
"The whole question of whether we win or lose the war depends on the Russians." - FDR, June 1942
https://www.reddit.com/r/AxisHistoryForum/
https://medium.com/counterfactualww2
"The whole question of whether we win or lose the war depends on the Russians." - FDR, June 1942
-
- Financial supporter
- Posts: 5644
- Joined: 16 May 2010, 15:12
- Location: United States of America
Re: Electric-drive BB's - tactical use of astern?
"Full Emergency Astern" is an option on all USN ships. How much that is varies by ship design.
Re: Electric-drive BB's - tactical use of astern?
Hi
I wonder what the structural implications would be for a BB with a Transom stern operating to your suggestion?
Regards
Andy H
I wonder what the structural implications would be for a BB with a Transom stern operating to your suggestion?
Regards
Andy H
-
- Financial supporter
- Posts: 5644
- Joined: 16 May 2010, 15:12
- Location: United States of America
Re: Electric-drive BB's - tactical use of astern?
Builder's trials are usually the last adjudicator for such issues. If the design can't handle the theoretical limits then a few pen-and-ink changes need to be made.
- TheMarcksPlan
- Banned
- Posts: 3255
- Joined: 15 Jan 2019, 23:32
- Location: USA
Re: Electric-drive BB's - tactical use of astern?
Yes but the reverse turbines weren't designed for anything like tactical speed IIRC. The e-BB's would lose only a couple knots at full astern.OpanaPointer wrote: ↑29 Aug 2020, 23:07"Full Emergency Astern" is an option on all USN ships. How much that is varies by ship design.
https://twitter.com/themarcksplan
https://www.reddit.com/r/AxisHistoryForum/
https://medium.com/counterfactualww2
"The whole question of whether we win or lose the war depends on the Russians." - FDR, June 1942
https://www.reddit.com/r/AxisHistoryForum/
https://medium.com/counterfactualww2
"The whole question of whether we win or lose the war depends on the Russians." - FDR, June 1942
- TheMarcksPlan
- Banned
- Posts: 3255
- Joined: 15 Jan 2019, 23:32
- Location: USA
Re: Electric-drive BB's - tactical use of astern?
Interesting. In terms of the bending moment created by a long-wave I don't see any difference. There's definitely a sea-keeping difference that would restrict the option to lower sea-states. Probably a panting* (I think that's the term for "coke-bottling") structural issue as well - the bow is configured to absorb and dissipate compressive forces along the length axis and the stern probably less so. That too would limit you to certain sea states.
*https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panting_( ... struction)
https://twitter.com/themarcksplan
https://www.reddit.com/r/AxisHistoryForum/
https://medium.com/counterfactualww2
"The whole question of whether we win or lose the war depends on the Russians." - FDR, June 1942
https://www.reddit.com/r/AxisHistoryForum/
https://medium.com/counterfactualww2
"The whole question of whether we win or lose the war depends on the Russians." - FDR, June 1942
- TheMarcksPlan
- Banned
- Posts: 3255
- Joined: 15 Jan 2019, 23:32
- Location: USA
Re: Electric-drive BB's - tactical use of astern?
Well I checked an engineering textbook and there is a difference for "ship girder" strength (that which resists the hogging/sagging tendency) but it's small enough normally not to be taken into account:TheMarcksPlan" wrote:In terms of the bending moment created by a long-wave I don't see any difference.
Sterns are not usually built with consideration (c) in mind. Probably the ~2kn lost going astern is sufficient to obviate reinforcement of the ship girder for when a 21kn ship crests a wave, suspending its forward end briefly.
https://twitter.com/themarcksplan
https://www.reddit.com/r/AxisHistoryForum/
https://medium.com/counterfactualww2
"The whole question of whether we win or lose the war depends on the Russians." - FDR, June 1942
https://www.reddit.com/r/AxisHistoryForum/
https://medium.com/counterfactualww2
"The whole question of whether we win or lose the war depends on the Russians." - FDR, June 1942
-
- Financial supporter
- Posts: 5644
- Joined: 16 May 2010, 15:12
- Location: United States of America
Re: Electric-drive BB's - tactical use of astern?
I'm not sure what you meant there. Doesn't seem to have congruence with what I said.TheMarcksPlan wrote: ↑30 Aug 2020, 01:25Yes but the reverse turbines weren't designed for anything like tactical speed IIRC. The e-BB's would lose only a couple knots at full astern.OpanaPointer wrote: ↑29 Aug 2020, 23:07"Full Emergency Astern" is an option on all USN ships. How much that is varies by ship design.
- TheMarcksPlan
- Banned
- Posts: 3255
- Joined: 15 Jan 2019, 23:32
- Location: USA
Re: Electric-drive BB's - tactical use of astern?
What speed was possible with the reverse turbines? I'm saying emergency power astern for non-electric BB's wasn't fast enough to merit any consideration for tactical use, whereas for e-BB's it was. The e-BB's could do around 19kn IIRC.OpanaPointer wrote: ↑30 Aug 2020, 13:28I'm not sure what you meant there. Doesn't seem to have congruence with what I said.TheMarcksPlan wrote: ↑30 Aug 2020, 01:25Yes but the reverse turbines weren't designed for anything like tactical speed IIRC. The e-BB's would lose only a couple knots at full astern.OpanaPointer wrote: ↑29 Aug 2020, 23:07"Full Emergency Astern" is an option on all USN ships. How much that is varies by ship design.
https://twitter.com/themarcksplan
https://www.reddit.com/r/AxisHistoryForum/
https://medium.com/counterfactualww2
"The whole question of whether we win or lose the war depends on the Russians." - FDR, June 1942
https://www.reddit.com/r/AxisHistoryForum/
https://medium.com/counterfactualww2
"The whole question of whether we win or lose the war depends on the Russians." - FDR, June 1942
-
- Financial supporter
- Posts: 5644
- Joined: 16 May 2010, 15:12
- Location: United States of America
Re: Electric-drive BB's - tactical use of astern?
Sorry, having an off day.
- TheMarcksPlan
- Banned
- Posts: 3255
- Joined: 15 Jan 2019, 23:32
- Location: USA
Re: Electric-drive BB's - tactical use of astern?
Yes, one of the benefits of e-drive is elimination of the reverse turbine.OpanaPointer wrote: ↑30 Aug 2020, 19:15I'm not aware that there was a separate reverse turbine. (Could be the morphine, of course.)
For many reasons it would be impractical to design a main turbine for reverse. The basic physics requires expansion of volume along the length axis; reverse would violate that and compress the steam rather than expanding and cooling it (how most air compressors work but they are powered rather than powering). The airfoils (each turbine has thousands) are optimized for uni-directional flow. A running turbine creates an axial force in the direction of flow, due primarily to the airfoils having extension along that length axis. Turbines need to be anchored at the end to combat this flow; usually the other (entry stage) end has a somewhat elastic grounding (what engineering textbooks call a "rocker") so that the entry stage end doesn't experience high tension forces. The expansion of the turbine under heat is another reason not to have it anchored at both ends.
I think later BB's substituted the reverse turbine for a gearing arrangement? That's also expensive/heavy though.
Sorry to hear that. Wishing you good health; your efforts at hyperwar are much appreciated.Sorry, having an off day.
https://twitter.com/themarcksplan
https://www.reddit.com/r/AxisHistoryForum/
https://medium.com/counterfactualww2
"The whole question of whether we win or lose the war depends on the Russians." - FDR, June 1942
https://www.reddit.com/r/AxisHistoryForum/
https://medium.com/counterfactualww2
"The whole question of whether we win or lose the war depends on the Russians." - FDR, June 1942
Re: Electric-drive BB's - tactical use of astern?
Wont they have to come to a full stop, then begin going astern? That makes a gunnery solution easier for the enemy doesn't it? Additionally this would seem to have plenty of potential to entirely disrupt the battleline.
- Thumpalumpacus
- Member
- Posts: 156
- Joined: 05 Feb 2016, 11:09
- Location: Hill Country, Tejas
Re: Electric-drive BB's - tactical use of astern?
33,000 tons of ship has a mind of its own. Not something I'd pull in a fleet engagement, you'll get broken divisions and slowing to a stop before reversing. Nice target you've got there.
- TheMarcksPlan
- Banned
- Posts: 3255
- Joined: 15 Jan 2019, 23:32
- Location: USA
Re: Electric-drive BB's - tactical use of astern?
The engines would be reversed while still travelling full ahead. There would be negative acceleration to slow the forward velocity, an instantaneous moment of 0 velocity, then acceleration towards full speed astern. To create a firing solution against such a target would require detecting the deceleration curve and integrating it across projectile flight time. To model deceleration would require knowing something about thrust lapse rate of the propellers, thrust/weight ratio of the ship, etc. It'd require iterative calculations to fit a model on the data, which would need be sub-second level reporting of changing speed with sub-second level accuracy. While that's mathematically possible it's almost certainly beyond a tactically-useful capability of old-timey computers quickly to generate a solution. And in any case far harder than a firing solution against a ship assumed to be travelling at constant speed.
You're right about disruption of the battleline - that's why the OP says the non-electric Standards might have confounded tactical use of astern speeds.
OTOH there were 6 e-BB's including the last five commissioned before WW2. As these ships were the most powerful ships in the interwar US fleet, it wouldn't be crazy to have segregated them tactically into their own division of the battle fleet. Accompanying DD/Cruisers were fast enough to adjust to whatever hijinks these BB's pulled at 19-21kn.
https://twitter.com/themarcksplan
https://www.reddit.com/r/AxisHistoryForum/
https://medium.com/counterfactualww2
"The whole question of whether we win or lose the war depends on the Russians." - FDR, June 1942
https://www.reddit.com/r/AxisHistoryForum/
https://medium.com/counterfactualww2
"The whole question of whether we win or lose the war depends on the Russians." - FDR, June 1942
Re: Electric-drive BB's - tactical use of astern?
Hello All;
Mr. TheMarcksPlan noted :
in her 1931-1933 major overhaul had her turboalternators and motors removed and
replaced with standard type geared turbines. As a result, during the Fleet Problems
of 1936, she showed a clean pair of heels to all the other battleships, exceeding 21 knots.
Respectfully :
Paul R. Ward
Mr. TheMarcksPlan noted :
Actually, by the time W2 had broken out, it was down to five e-BBs - The New Mexico,OTOH there were 6 e-BB's including the last five commissioned before WW2.
As these ships were the most powerful ships in the interwar US fleet.......
in her 1931-1933 major overhaul had her turboalternators and motors removed and
replaced with standard type geared turbines. As a result, during the Fleet Problems
of 1936, she showed a clean pair of heels to all the other battleships, exceeding 21 knots.
Respectfully :
Paul R. Ward
Information not shared, is information lost
Voices that are banned, are voices who cannot share information....
Discussions that are silenced, are discussions that will occur elsewhere !
Voices that are banned, are voices who cannot share information....
Discussions that are silenced, are discussions that will occur elsewhere !