When did 8th Army's logistical flow switch directions?
-
- Banned
- Posts: 3255
- Joined: 15 Jan 2019 22:32
- Location: USA
When did 8th Army's logistical flow switch directions?
At some point between Alamein and Tunisgrad, 8th Army presumably began receiving supplies from the west rather than the east. Can anyone describe how this unfolded or point me to a book/resource that has detailed description of the matter? I guess I'm particularly curious at what point the British stopped sending Monty's supplies around the Cape. Was it months before the linkup in Tunisia, in anticipation of that link-up occurring? Or did the British play it safe and continue dispatching supplies the long way, so 8th Army wasn't left dry in case the link up got delayed?
https://twitter.com/themarcksplan
https://www.reddit.com/r/AxisHistoryForum/
https://medium.com/counterfactualww2
"The whole question of whether we win or lose the war depends on the Russians." - FDR, June 1942
https://www.reddit.com/r/AxisHistoryForum/
https://medium.com/counterfactualww2
"The whole question of whether we win or lose the war depends on the Russians." - FDR, June 1942
-
- Member
- Posts: 2935
- Joined: 01 May 2006 19:52
- Location: UK
Re: When did 8th Army's logistical flow switch directions?
I don’t think 8th Army met the forces from the west until around April 1943. So convoys would have continued to go round the Cape long into 1943.
Tom
Tom
-
- Member
- Posts: 2935
- Joined: 01 May 2006 19:52
- Location: UK
Re: When did 8th Army's logistical flow switch directions?
I’m away from my books at the moment but I’m doubtful whether 8th Army was ever supplied from the west during the Tunisia campaign. I’ll dig out some sources at The weekend if no one else has posted a response by then.
Regards
Tom
Regards
Tom
-
- Member
- Posts: 354
- Joined: 04 May 2020 11:37
- Location: Scotland
Re: When did 8th Army's logistical flow switch directions?
The first convoy to sail through the central Med from Gibraltar to Egypt after 1940, was GTX1 which left 24 May 1943 and arrived in Alexandria on 4 June. So 11 days after the German surrender in North Africa. The first return convoy left Alexandria on 3rd June and arrived in Gib on 17th June 1943. An awful lot of minesweeping had to go on in the Sicilian Narrows to make that possible.
Pantelleria, Lampedusa and Linosa, Italian islands in the Sicilian Channel, didn’t fall until 11/12 June 1943.
The fast WS troop convoys continued to go around the Cape until Sept 1943.
It is also worth remembering that a good part of the Op Husky invasion of Sicily was mounted out of Egypt.
Pantelleria, Lampedusa and Linosa, Italian islands in the Sicilian Channel, didn’t fall until 11/12 June 1943.
The fast WS troop convoys continued to go around the Cape until Sept 1943.
It is also worth remembering that a good part of the Op Husky invasion of Sicily was mounted out of Egypt.
-
- Member
- Posts: 354
- Joined: 04 May 2020 11:37
- Location: Scotland
Re: When did 8th Army's logistical flow switch directions?
If you look over on Convoyweb you will be able to see which convoys stopped in Algeria and which ran all the way through the Med.
KMF/KMS series, which were the main series of convoys from the U.K. to the Med from Nov 1942, terminated at Algiers until August 1943 when they began to run all the way through the Med to Egypt with ships then going on to the Far East.
Full list of convoy designations here
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of ... _by_region
Convoyweb here
http://www.convoyweb.org.uk/hague/index.html
KMF/KMS series, which were the main series of convoys from the U.K. to the Med from Nov 1942, terminated at Algiers until August 1943 when they began to run all the way through the Med to Egypt with ships then going on to the Far East.
Full list of convoy designations here
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of ... _by_region
Convoyweb here
http://www.convoyweb.org.uk/hague/index.html
-
- Member
- Posts: 2935
- Joined: 01 May 2006 19:52
- Location: UK
Re: When did 8th Army's logistical flow switch directions?
Ewen,
Thanks for those extra details. I’m going to assume they answer TMP’s question.
Regards
Tom
Thanks for those extra details. I’m going to assume they answer TMP’s question.

Regards
Tom
-
- Banned
- Posts: 3255
- Joined: 15 Jan 2019 22:32
- Location: USA
Re: When did 8th Army's logistical flow switch directions?
Thank you! Question fully answered.EwenS wrote: ↑23 Sep 2020 11:34If you look over on Convoyweb you will be able to see which convoys stopped in Algeria and which ran all the way through the Med.
KMF/KMS series, which were the main series of convoys from the U.K. to the Med from Nov 1942, terminated at Algiers until August 1943 when they began to run all the way through the Med to Egypt with ships then going on to the Far East.
Full list of convoy designations here
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of ... _by_region
Convoyweb here
http://www.convoyweb.org.uk/hague/index.html
https://twitter.com/themarcksplan
https://www.reddit.com/r/AxisHistoryForum/
https://medium.com/counterfactualww2
"The whole question of whether we win or lose the war depends on the Russians." - FDR, June 1942
https://www.reddit.com/r/AxisHistoryForum/
https://medium.com/counterfactualww2
"The whole question of whether we win or lose the war depends on the Russians." - FDR, June 1942
-
- Banned
- Posts: 3255
- Joined: 15 Jan 2019 22:32
- Location: USA
Re: When did 8th Army's logistical flow switch directions?
Ok not to undermine my thanks but on reflection I'm wondering whether it's true that 1st Army shared no part of its supplies with 8th after they linked up. It's at least conceivable that some of the Alexandria-bound convoys were designated for Husky buildup and that the Wallies judged the Tunisian buildup sufficiently established to finish things there, even with the addition of 8th to the logistics calculus.Tom from Cornwall wrote: ↑22 Sep 2020 22:04I’m away from my books at the moment but I’m doubtful whether 8th Army was ever supplied from the west during the Tunisia campaign. I’ll dig out some sources at The weekend if no one else has posted a response by then.
Regards
Tom
Regardless EwenS's evidence establishes that the UK took the prudent course and ensured Monty would be supplied in the event that linkup was delayed. Or they judged overland supply from the West less practical than the long sea route.
https://twitter.com/themarcksplan
https://www.reddit.com/r/AxisHistoryForum/
https://medium.com/counterfactualww2
"The whole question of whether we win or lose the war depends on the Russians." - FDR, June 1942
https://www.reddit.com/r/AxisHistoryForum/
https://medium.com/counterfactualww2
"The whole question of whether we win or lose the war depends on the Russians." - FDR, June 1942
-
- Member
- Posts: 3474
- Joined: 28 Apr 2013 17:14
- Location: London
Re: When did 8th Army's logistical flow switch directions?
C20th armies were dependent on a chain of communications from the battlefield, men, equipment and supplies go up from whatever base is supporting the operation while wounded, broken vehicles and salvage go in the opposite direction. Eighth Army's base was in the Nile Delta and Palestine where the British had established many of the facilities only found in the UK, e.g. workshops to overhaul aircraft and tank engines. 80% of supplies by weight would have been fuel and ammunition. There would have been stocks of both in the Middle East.TheMarcksPlan wrote: ↑23 Sep 2020 23:49Ok not to undermine my thanks but on reflection I'm wondering whether it's true that 1st Army shared no part of its supplies with 8th after they linked up. It's at least conceivable that some of the Alexandria-bound convoys were designated for Husky buildup and that the Wallies judged the Tunisian buildup sufficiently established to finish things there, even with the addition of 8th to the logistics calculus.
Regardless EwenS's evidence establishes that the UK took the prudent course and ensured Monty would be supplied in the event that linkup was delayed. Or they judged overland supply from the West less practical than the long sea route.
Military logistics are not just the matter of dumping supplies at a port. While it is conceivable for ammunition and fuel to have been landed at Algiers. I don't think First Army had the transport to supply Eighth Army as well as their own troops. If you want to move supplies in bulk sea and rail is far better than trucks. I suppose convoys could be routed overland, but the most usable route goes via the Kasserine Pass. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... unisie.svg
-
- Member
- Posts: 354
- Joined: 04 May 2020 11:37
- Location: Scotland
Re: When did 8th Army's logistical flow switch directions?
There are a number of things to bear in mind.
1. The link up between First and Eighth Armies occurred on 6th April 1943 between Gabès and Gafsa, just over a month before the German surrender. So even if it was possible, there was little time to reorient Eighth Army’s supply lines.
2. The link up was with US forces on First Army’s right flank. So what is coming down the supply line to them is not necessarily compatible with Eighth Army’s needs e.g. ammunition.
3. Most of the lines of communication in the period stick to the Algerian & Tunisian coasts. Rail links are limited to single track narrow gauge lines. See here. https://history.army.mil/books/wwii/Bea ... erVII.html
4. Tripoli was captured on 23rd Jan 1943. By mid Feb supplies for Eighth Army were being landed there, augmenting those supplies coming forward from Egypt by road. There was a railway that ran from there towards the Tunisian border to help move those supplies forward.
5. The geography of the region does not make overland transport away from main routes very easy.
1. The link up between First and Eighth Armies occurred on 6th April 1943 between Gabès and Gafsa, just over a month before the German surrender. So even if it was possible, there was little time to reorient Eighth Army’s supply lines.
2. The link up was with US forces on First Army’s right flank. So what is coming down the supply line to them is not necessarily compatible with Eighth Army’s needs e.g. ammunition.
3. Most of the lines of communication in the period stick to the Algerian & Tunisian coasts. Rail links are limited to single track narrow gauge lines. See here. https://history.army.mil/books/wwii/Bea ... erVII.html
4. Tripoli was captured on 23rd Jan 1943. By mid Feb supplies for Eighth Army were being landed there, augmenting those supplies coming forward from Egypt by road. There was a railway that ran from there towards the Tunisian border to help move those supplies forward.
5. The geography of the region does not make overland transport away from main routes very easy.
-
- Host - Allied sections
- Posts: 9568
- Joined: 02 Sep 2006 20:31
- Location: USA
Re: When did 8th Army's logistical flow switch directions?
The ability to send GTX1 was much dependent on the inability of first the Axis air forces, & then the naval forces to interfere. Effectively both were suppressed and the RN was confident significant Axis attacks could not be made.EwenS wrote: ↑23 Sep 2020 10:40The first convoy to sail through the central Med from Gibraltar to Egypt after 1940, was GTX1 which left 24 May 1943 and arrived in Alexandria on 4 June. So 11 days after the German surrender in North Africa. The first return convoy left Alexandria on 3rd June and arrived in Gib on 17th June 1943. An awful lot of minesweeping had to go on in the Sicilian Narrows to make that possible.
Pantelleria, Lampedusa and Linosa, Italian islands in the Sicilian Channel, didn’t fall until 11/12 June 1943.
I'm wondering what the considerations for continuing this were?The fast WS troop convoys continued to go around the Cape until Sept 1943.
Looking at WGF Jacksons history of the Italian campaign (The battle for Italy) the bulk of the 8th Army embarked in Alexandria. A major exception was the Canadian Division which embarked in the UK. The 7th Army embarked from Algerian ports. The US 45th ID originally embarked in the US, but was administratively loaded. Its transports spent a frantic 48 hours at the docks reloading for a amphib landing. The air forces based out of Malta, Lybia, Tunisia, and Algeria. The smaller short legged landing craft were in part advance collected near Bizerte. Others aboard transports departing from Algeria & Egypt, or the UK.It is also worth remembering that a good part of the Op Husky invasion of Sicily was mounted out of Egypt.
-
- Member
- Posts: 5273
- Joined: 01 Jan 2016 21:21
- Location: Bremerton, Washington
Re: When did 8th Army's logistical flow switch directions?
Quite probably the simple understanding that Alan Brooke's long touted "saving a million tons of sea transport" was a political and military conference bargaining tool and proved to be nothing of the sort?Carl Schwamberger wrote: ↑24 Sep 2020 19:30I'm wondering what the considerations for continuing this were?

Richard C. Anderson Jr.
American Thunder: U.S. Army Tank Design, Development, and Doctrine in World War II
Cracking Hitler's Atlantic Wall
Hitler's Last Gamble
Artillery Hell
American Thunder: U.S. Army Tank Design, Development, and Doctrine in World War II
Cracking Hitler's Atlantic Wall
Hitler's Last Gamble
Artillery Hell
-
- Host - Allied sections
- Posts: 9568
- Joined: 02 Sep 2006 20:31
- Location: USA
Re: When did 8th Army's logistical flow switch directions?
Less practical is a understatement. It took four and a half months to establish rail and road net sufficient, & then move forward supplies for the 1st Army and the US/French corps to undertake substantial offensive operations. All that was North of Teresa where the southern most major supply depot and airfield group was established from the Algerian ports. South of Tebessa there were unpaved roads & trails, then horse and camel tracks through thinly populated hills, mountains, and valleys. The Axis armies controlled the coastal strip of paved automotive roads and railway in Tunisia. From the coastal railway terminus it would have been inefficient automotive transport 600+ km, mostly across unpaved landscape. there is also a large depression with salt marshes extending from the coast near Gabes two hundred kilometers inland. Delivering 900 or 500, or even 200 tons daily per division slice of the 8th Army this route looks beyond difficult.Or they judged overland supply from the West less practical than the long sea route.
-
- Host - Allied sections
- Posts: 9568
- Joined: 02 Sep 2006 20:31
- Location: USA
Re: When did 8th Army's logistical flow switch directions?
After the fact perhaps. I suspect that in January the participants at the SYMBOL conference in Casablanca could not have anticipated the relative strength or weakness of the Axis forces in May. Experience in 1941-1942 did not support the idea of sending convoys past a Axis held Sardinia & Sicily.Richard Anderson wrote: ↑24 Sep 2020 19:58Quite probably the simple understanding that Alan Brooke's long touted "saving a million tons of sea transport" was a political and military conference bargaining tool and proved to be nothing of the sort?Carl Schwamberger wrote: ↑24 Sep 2020 19:30I'm wondering what the considerations for continuing this were?![]()
-
- Banned
- Posts: 3255
- Joined: 15 Jan 2019 22:32
- Location: USA
Re: When did 8th Army's logistical flow switch directions?
Maybe Churchill was maintaining the Egypt base to (1) convince Turkey that British forces nearby and could help if she entered, as W.allies were pressuring her to do and (2) to have an argument for his Balkans adventures (the troops are right there Franklin, let's use them there).Carl Schwamberger wrote:I'm wondering what the considerations for continuing this were?The fast WS troop convoys continued to go around the Cape until Sept 1943.
https://twitter.com/themarcksplan
https://www.reddit.com/r/AxisHistoryForum/
https://medium.com/counterfactualww2
"The whole question of whether we win or lose the war depends on the Russians." - FDR, June 1942
https://www.reddit.com/r/AxisHistoryForum/
https://medium.com/counterfactualww2
"The whole question of whether we win or lose the war depends on the Russians." - FDR, June 1942