Most ambitious wars of conquest throughout history?
Most ambitious wars of conquest throughout history?
Which wars of conquest throughout history could realistically be described as being the most ambitious? I could think of Nazi Germany's desire to conquer Lebensraum in the entire European part of the Soviet Union during World War II as well as of the US's war with Mexico in 1846-1848 (the Mexican-American War) in order to acquire a lot of additional space for the US's growing population. There were also, of course, Saddam Hussein's wars in Iran and Kuwait, which were not territorially ambitious but were nevertheless ambitious in another war--specifically with him (and his Iraq) aiming to control a much larger percentage of the Middle East's and world's oil reserves, thus making it even easier for Iraq to become wealthy and to extort and blackmail other countries with its vast oil reserves. Anyway, though, which additional examples of this were there?
Re: Most ambitious wars of conquest throughout history?
For the record, I want to specifically focus on the last couple of centuries here and on conquests that were actually aimed to subsequently be directly annexed to the motherland/metropole--such as French Algeria.
Re: Most ambitious wars of conquest throughout history?
There is the War of !812, to more than double the US.
Re: Most ambitious wars of conquest throughout history?
True; failed but definitely ambitious!
-
- Member
- Posts: 10158
- Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 12:19
Re: Most ambitious wars of conquest throughout history?
Hi Guys,
It has to be the USSR. Nobody else ever had a public plan for a single world government and you can't get more ambitious than that, unless you go for the moon as well, which they also tried.
Cheers,
Sid.
It has to be the USSR. Nobody else ever had a public plan for a single world government and you can't get more ambitious than that, unless you go for the moon as well, which they also tried.
Cheers,
Sid.
Re: Most ambitious wars of conquest throughout history?
That was only true for the Lenin-era USSR, no?
-
- Member
- Posts: 10158
- Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 12:19
Re: Most ambitious wars of conquest throughout history?
Hi Futurist,
I guess it was still technically policy until the Comintern was dissolved in the middle of WWII.
Cheers,
Sid.
I guess it was still technically policy until the Comintern was dissolved in the middle of WWII.
Cheers,
Sid.
Re: Most ambitious wars of conquest throughout history?
Resurrected with Putin. Example Crimea.
-
- Member
- Posts: 10158
- Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 12:19
Re: Most ambitious wars of conquest throughout history?
Hi henryk,
I see Putin as in the more limited Hitler-reclaiming-lands-lost-at-Versailles mode - trying to regain, as he sees it, territory that he considers historically Russian that was lost with the break up of the USSR. This includes all of Ukraine and Belarus and quite a bit more.
Cheers,
Sid.
I see Putin as in the more limited Hitler-reclaiming-lands-lost-at-Versailles mode - trying to regain, as he sees it, territory that he considers historically Russian that was lost with the break up of the USSR. This includes all of Ukraine and Belarus and quite a bit more.
Cheers,
Sid.
- Thumpalumpacus
- Member
- Posts: 156
- Joined: 05 Feb 2016, 11:09
- Location: Hill Country, Tejas
Re: Most ambitious wars of conquest throughout history?
I think that he was talking about the failed US attempt to conquer Canada here.
Re: Most ambitious wars of conquest throughout history?
Yep, similar to Miklos Horthy and non-Nazi German nationalists in the interwar era such as Gustav Stresemann.Sid Guttridge wrote: ↑23 Jan 2021, 23:11Hi henryk,
I see Putin as in the more limited Hitler-reclaiming-lands-lost-at-Versailles mode - trying to regain, as he sees it, territory that he considers historically Russian that was lost with the break up of the USSR. This includes all of Ukraine and Belarus and quite a bit more.
Cheers,
Sid.
Re: Most ambitious wars of conquest throughout history?
So, Putin is hoping to restore the Communist Empire which presumably means in Europe taking over the Ukraine, Belarus, Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia. I suspect that people are taking western news media and NATO statements on what Russian intentions are at face value. Given the huge force imbalance in favour of NATO which is comparable to that of pre war Germany and Poland it is very unlikely that Russia is seriously contemplating such a scenario. For those who do not believe this I would suggest adding up the defence budgets of the NATO countries and comparing the total to Russia’s defence budget. Putin once said something along the lines that you would have to be mad to attack a NATO member. Even though Belarus and Ukraine are not NATO members an all out Russian attack on these countries would likely elicit a NATO response.
Though an attack by Russia on a NATO country can be ruled out further NATO expansion east cannot. The Ukraine would like to join NATO but at present with an ongoing military conflict in the east it can’t. Ukraine joining NATO would very likely be a red line for Russia and if NATO were to seek a conflict this would be the way to go. Maybe Putin does want to annex the eastern part of Ukraine but I would suggest one reason for keeping the conflict simmering is to prevent Ukraine joining NATO.
If Khrushchev had decided in 1954 not to transfer the Crimea from the Russian Soviet Socialist Republic to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic there would now be no issue with the Crimea. Of course It depends on who does the illegal takeover or breakaway as to whether a blind eye is turned on the matter or not.
Though an attack by Russia on a NATO country can be ruled out further NATO expansion east cannot. The Ukraine would like to join NATO but at present with an ongoing military conflict in the east it can’t. Ukraine joining NATO would very likely be a red line for Russia and if NATO were to seek a conflict this would be the way to go. Maybe Putin does want to annex the eastern part of Ukraine but I would suggest one reason for keeping the conflict simmering is to prevent Ukraine joining NATO.
If Khrushchev had decided in 1954 not to transfer the Crimea from the Russian Soviet Socialist Republic to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic there would now be no issue with the Crimea. Of course It depends on who does the illegal takeover or breakaway as to whether a blind eye is turned on the matter or not.
-
- Member
- Posts: 10158
- Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 12:19
Re: Most ambitious wars of conquest throughout history?
Hi Steve,
I doubt he thinks it practicable to restore the Russian Empire. Russia is too stretched already to think about occupying 14 other countries, most of whom don't want to be Russian. However, he can reclaim ethnic Russians (Crimea) and perhaps peacefully reabsorb Belarus, which has Russian-leaning leadership already. He probably doesn't regard Ukrainians as non-Russian, and ideally would like Ukraine back, but the war over the Donbas has stoked Ukrainian nationalism and undermined any possibility of that happening peaceably in his lifetime, if not ever. If I remember correctly, 40% of Kazakhstan's population were Russian in 1990, but so many have left since that using them as a lever has been drastically weakened as well.
Cheers,
Sid.
I doubt he thinks it practicable to restore the Russian Empire. Russia is too stretched already to think about occupying 14 other countries, most of whom don't want to be Russian. However, he can reclaim ethnic Russians (Crimea) and perhaps peacefully reabsorb Belarus, which has Russian-leaning leadership already. He probably doesn't regard Ukrainians as non-Russian, and ideally would like Ukraine back, but the war over the Donbas has stoked Ukrainian nationalism and undermined any possibility of that happening peaceably in his lifetime, if not ever. If I remember correctly, 40% of Kazakhstan's population were Russian in 1990, but so many have left since that using them as a lever has been drastically weakened as well.
Cheers,
Sid.
Re: Most ambitious wars of conquest throughout history?
Kazakhstan is now slightly less than 20% Russian, I believe. Maybe around 25% if one includes the remaining Slavs and Europeans there. But still declining even today since Kazakhs are likely MUCH more fertile.
As for Belarus, I think that even they developed a sufficiently strong national identity to oppose being reabsorbed by Russia by now.
As for Belarus, I think that even they developed a sufficiently strong national identity to oppose being reabsorbed by Russia by now.