Does anyone have resources or care to share information regarding the comparative advantages and disadvantages of the U.S. and German synthetic rubber industries in WW2? I know that Germany began planning for synthetic rubber in advance of the war because it anticipated the British blockade, but when did the U.S. begin planning for its massive synthetic rubber industry?
Was U.S. rubber production of better quality and suitable for use on truck and plane tires? I heard on this forum previously that German synthetic rubber ("buna") was only good for "soft" rubber applications such as wiring, but not for trucks.
Also, did Britain rely on U.S. synthetic rubber after the Japanese conquests, or did its other colonies provide enough for it to get by?
Any resources would be appreciated. Thanks!
German vs US synthetic rubber
-
- Member
- Posts: 641
- Joined: 17 Dec 2020 06:23
- Location: Australia
-
- Member
- Posts: 3045
- Joined: 01 May 2006 19:52
- Location: UK
Re: German vs US synthetic rubber
Hi,
After the loss of Malaya, it seems that Ceylon became a key supplier of rubber to Britain. I’ll see if I can rustle up some more information on that tomorrow.
Regards
Tom
After the loss of Malaya, it seems that Ceylon became a key supplier of rubber to Britain. I’ll see if I can rustle up some more information on that tomorrow.
Regards
Tom
-
- Member
- Posts: 3045
- Joined: 01 May 2006 19:52
- Location: UK
Re: German vs US synthetic rubber
For Ceylon read Sri Lanka.historygeek2021 wrote: ↑22 Mar 2021 22:25Also, did Britain rely on U.S. synthetic rubber after the Japanese conquests, or did its other colonies provide enough for it to get by?
Found a little on natural rubber production in Ashley Jackson’s book “Ceylon at War”. It seems that by 1944, Ceylon was producing about 60% of natural rubber available to the United Nations (just under 100,000 tons).
Apparently by 1944, all tyres and inner tubes being used by American forces in the South Pacific were made in Australia using Ceylonese rubber.
Source: Ceylon at War, pp.207-208.
What isn’t clear from this source is whether Ceylonese rubber exports were arriving in the UK for manufacture there or whether they were being used by British empire manufacturing in other parts of the empire.
I hope that is of interest. I’ll see if I can find any sources on rubber use in UK based manufacturing.
Regards
Tom
-
- Member
- Posts: 641
- Joined: 17 Dec 2020 06:23
- Location: Australia
Re: German vs US synthetic rubber
Very interesting, thanks!
-
- Host - Allied sections
- Posts: 9915
- Joined: 02 Sep 2006 20:31
- Location: USA
Re: German vs US synthetic rubber
Federal government intervention started in late 1940 as far as I've found. Production in the US in 1941 was under 300 tons, in 1945 it hit 70,000 tons. Most natural rubber pre1940 imports to the US came from French Indochina. Japanese efforts at occupation of FIC threatened o divert the raw rubber to Japans industry, and to increase price to the US.historygeek2021 wrote: ↑22 Mar 2021 22:25... but when did the U.S. begin planning for its massive synthetic rubber industry? ...
-
- Member
- Posts: 112
- Joined: 31 Mar 2014 20:42
Re: German vs US synthetic rubber
For some US background, see http://usautoindustryworldwartwo.com/fi ... %20war.htm at the US Auto Industry in World War Two site. There are about five pages on the development of sources of rubber and of producing synthetic rubber by one of the major US tire manufacturers,.
-
- Member
- Posts: 641
- Joined: 17 Dec 2020 06:23
- Location: Australia
Re: German vs US synthetic rubber
Thanks!reedwh52 wrote: ↑28 Mar 2021 01:47For some US background, see http://usautoindustryworldwartwo.com/fi ... %20war.htm at the US Auto Industry in World War Two site. There are about five pages on the development of sources of rubber and of producing synthetic rubber by one of the major US tire manufacturers,.