SS-Panzer-Regiment 12 in the Normandy
-
- Member
- Posts: 6350
- Joined: 01 Jan 2016, 22:21
- Location: Bremerton, Washington
Re: SS-Panzer-Regiment 12 in the Normandy
Well, the Sherbroke's landed 12 Sherman VC, 46 Sherman III, and 10 Stuarts on D-Day. A Squadron lost 1 III to mechanical on 7 June, C Squadron lost 4 VC and 3 III to KO and 1 III to mechanical, HQ lost 2 Stuart KO. B Squadron is murkier on dates, but lost 5 KO and 7 damaged, probably all on 7 June. So they had a s many as 78 tanks going into the engagement at Authie.
Nearly forgot, Archives Canada Microfilm T-12758.
Nearly forgot, Archives Canada Microfilm T-12758.
Richard C. Anderson Jr.
American Thunder: U.S. Army Tank Design, Development, and Doctrine in World War II
Cracking Hitler's Atlantic Wall
Hitler's Last Gamble
Artillery Hell
American Thunder: U.S. Army Tank Design, Development, and Doctrine in World War II
Cracking Hitler's Atlantic Wall
Hitler's Last Gamble
Artillery Hell
-
- Member
- Posts: 8251
- Joined: 07 May 2002, 20:40
- Location: Teesside
Re: SS-Panzer-Regiment 12 in the Normandy
Did this extensive research throw up any details of the 'captured tanks' that 12th SS were 'forced' to use because of their own disastrous losses?
One is mentioned in this document:
PRO WO171/336, War Diary of 30 Corps "G" for June 1944.
"Appendix 'B' to & AD Intsum 30
REPORT ON CROMWELL TANK WITH GERMAN MARKINGS.
Found 4 Jul 44 at 905657 Recovered by an Armd Div REME and inspected BRETTEVILLE L'ORGUEILLEUSE 923720 5 Jul 44.
1. Type Cromwell CS Mk IV (95mm gun)
2. Markings (a) German cross on front and side of turret
(b) British markings painted over with cam paint but the following clearly visible:
T187761
1 LCT
3. Condition Penetrated in eight places by what looks like 17 pdr but NOT set on fire. REME reports that NO KO'd Cromwells handled have been set on fire.
4. Modifications
(a) Cupola previously reported as German is definitely British.
(b) German wireless apparatus (thought to be an inter-comm apparatus only).
5. Amn Confirmed that some German amn for main armament was in the tank.
6. Documents Following found in tank:
Identification: 12 SS Pz Div
FPN : 59043 A
7. General Tank definitely did not belong to the Div that found it. No information available as to who knocked it out or when.
(Source: 8 Corps IS No. 11)
COMMENTS: This tank was lost at VILLERS BOCAGE on June 13."
This is the Cromwell mentioned above shown just after it was taken at Villers Bocage June 14-15th.
and this the location where the wreck was found/knocked out:
July 6th 1944
Another mention:
The book '1st and 2nd Northamptonshire Yeomanry' (pub 1946) page 117 has a note claiming the 2nd Notts Yeo recovered a Cromwell with German markings whilst in reserve ( 30th June-8th July) north of Putot-en-bessin.
On the 30th(June) the Regiment was drawn into reserve and moved back to leaguer in some wheat fields N. W. of Norrey-en-Bessin alongside 29th Armoured Brigade. Next day the Regiment moved into harbour to the North of Putot-en-Bessin, where it remained till july 8th reorganising and re-equipping. Capt. ]. P. McGillycuddy took command of "A" Squadron with Capt. A. B. Venner as 2 IC. Several "C" Squadron tanks were recovered from the battle-field and also a Cromwell, which had been captured by the Germans from the 7th Armoured Division used by them in the battle and knocked out by the Regiment. On the 8th the Regiment moved up to some corn-fields South of Le Mesnil- Patry in a counter-attack role. On the 11th "B" Squadron landed and on the 12th joined the Regiment
The location of the dump where this wreck was most likely ended up is 99% certain to be the collection point at Bray which is just above Putot en Bessin
Note that these 5 captured tanks do not appear anywhere as 12th SS losses.
Note also that I am fairly confident that the famous Analysis of 75 mm Sherman Tank Casualties Suffered Between 6th June and 10th July 1944:Report No. 12 was compiled by a 'survey' of the tank wrecks as they sat in this dump at Bray.
https://scholars.wlu.ca/cgi/viewcontent ... ontext=cmh
Last edited by Michael Kenny on 18 Nov 2020, 17:05, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Member
- Posts: 8251
- Joined: 07 May 2002, 20:40
- Location: Teesside
Re: SS-Panzer-Regiment 12 in the Normandy
Richard Anderson wrote: ↑18 Nov 2020, 01:04Well, the Sherbroke's landed 12 Sherman VC, 46 Sherman III, and 10 Stuarts on D-Day. A Squadron lost 1 III to mechanical on 7 June, C Squadron lost 4 VC and 3 III to KO and 1 III to mechanical, HQ lost 2 Stuart KO. B Squadron is murkier on dates, but lost 5 KO and 7 damaged, probably all on 7 June. So they had a s many as 78 tanks going into the engagement at Authie.
I covered this action in another forum:
http://www.mapleleafup.net/forums/showt ... hp?t=28282
-
- Member
- Posts: 3211
- Joined: 01 May 2006, 20:52
- Location: UK
Re: SS-Panzer-Regiment 12 in the Normandy
Michael,
When are you going to publish all of your extraordinary research? Brilliant stuff again.
Rich,
Thanks for those numbers. Not 500 or 100 then.
Regards
Tom
When are you going to publish all of your extraordinary research? Brilliant stuff again.
Rich,
Thanks for those numbers. Not 500 or 100 then.
Regards
Tom
Re: SS-Panzer-Regiment 12 in the Normandy
Received the book today- as a preview it is a must-have and complements other works especially the unit diary of SS PR-12. There is an unusual depth and breadth of detail about the "life and times" of the unit, personalities/personnel & sundry details. A key feature of the book is the huge photo gallery- many of them "behind the scenes" , from private collections and not generic photos- with many detailed captions. A comparable researcher is someone like Jason Mark. The book is also dense with accounts from veterans,in training, after-hours, and in combat. The first 148 pages covers troop training and the rest of the book focuses on combat June-August 1944. Not a book for the general audience or persons afraid of skull-caps. A lot of skull caps in this one
-
- Member
- Posts: 8251
- Joined: 07 May 2002, 20:40
- Location: Teesside
Re: SS-Panzer-Regiment 12 in the Normandy
Not the only suspect number in the extract.
This:
claims a lot but fortunately can be checked because there were 2 aircraft taking photos that day. This is the tip of the Canadian advance (green arrow) at Franqueville (black square on map) where they were ambushed and lost several tanks. perhaps half a dozen. The area is open so you can clearly see the nearest wrecks at Franqueville ringed in yellow. The pink arrows shows the area where 5 kp (mentioned in the book extract) SS Pz Rgt 12 were firing from.
Now there are known wrecks lost in the ground haze so not every detail is visible but clearly no way there are '20' burning wrecks knocked out in the first encounter.
Slightly wider view Here you can see German tanks skirting Authie (white square on map)
II/SS Pz Rgt 12 had 12 Pz IV as total losses and an unknown number knocked out. Their counter-attack failed to drive the Allies back into the sea.
-
- Member
- Posts: 3370
- Joined: 19 Sep 2008, 14:44
Re: SS-Panzer-Regiment 12 in the Normandy
Michael, looking at the relevant pages from "Waffen SS Armour in Normandy", which is just extracts from the regiemnts war diaries, on 7th June 5th Company only lost 3 Panzer IVs on 7th June. However it does give the entire battalion's losses as a total of 12 that day. As for Canadian tanks claimed destroyed it has 5th Company 9 Shermans, 6th 14, 7th 5 and 8th 1. Ammunition expenditure for the 2nd Bn that day was 944 x HE and 721 x AP and their total personnel casualties were 30.
These figures are bit less dramatic.
These figures are bit less dramatic.
Alan
-
- Member
- Posts: 3211
- Joined: 01 May 2006, 20:52
- Location: UK
Re: SS-Panzer-Regiment 12 in the Normandy
Do you know what the 4th and 5th volumes are going to be about?Charles Steiner wrote: ↑17 Nov 2020, 21:38Just for the record, I have this book as the two others on this division. I can add that a fourth book about this division is planned which will deal with the war crimes.
-
- Member
- Posts: 3211
- Joined: 01 May 2006, 20:52
- Location: UK
-
- Member
- Posts: 27
- Joined: 08 Feb 2020, 13:18
- Location: Greece
Re: SS-Panzer-Regiment 12 in the Normandy
Greetings gents, I have this book, and I can highly recommend it. It has the daily KTB reports that you can find in Szamveber's Hitlerjugend book, but it also has plethora of first hand accounts not printed elsewhere(I have an extensive library on Waffen SS panzer divisions) as well as contemporary pictures, some of which were taken after the war, depicting the wrecks of specific 12th Pz.Rgt tanks. Cheers.
Re: SS-Panzer-Regiment 12 in the Normandy
I finished reading the first section on training and it expands the unit diary & Hubert Meyer. I don't think there is any unit history of an armored unit, Axis or allied that is more informative in english as far as training goes.
The personal accounts and troop training schedules etc. give a useful picture of how the German army (the unit was largely trained by the Army) tried to train their tank troops with very limited time and resources (equipment, ammunition, specialized personnel, etc.) in 1943 and 1944. This is far cry from the pre-war standards of training , a good comparison can be found in Schneider's Panzer Tactics. The training of SS Panzer Regiment 12 can be described as very rushed, improvised and low resourced. Officer and NCO candidate crash courses for 17 and 18 year olds on the fly. This unit was raised from a group of veterans and transfers from the Heer, numbering only over a company who trained 16-18 year olds and Luftwaffe transfers. There is a severe lack of fuel, ammunition, vehicles, and AFVs to train on and it is implied that the men had a lot of free time and their training was intellectual and not sufficiently hands on as a consequence. Dozens of LW transfers were executed for desertion, there were executions among the HJ for theft, and there were deaths from training accidents.
Their unit training only starts in proper in 1944 with several unit maneuvers, the substance of which was limited by fuel shortages. There is an impression that there was a lot of downtime from the lack of resources and vocational expertise. Anyway, a useful model of what it was like. Certainly a veteran German unit coming to the West to rebuild would not have the same difficulties as a newly raised one as SS Panzer Regiment 12. The unit was considered ready shortly before D-Day, with the training of the Panther battalion lagging than of the Pz IV.
The photographs of training are interesting, and there are some from their April maneuvers. However it seems like a lot of personal accounts/photos were acquired from personal contacts, so a lot of other perspectives aren't included. I would have liked to have seen more details and photos from the other maneuvers noted in their unit diary.
The personal accounts and troop training schedules etc. give a useful picture of how the German army (the unit was largely trained by the Army) tried to train their tank troops with very limited time and resources (equipment, ammunition, specialized personnel, etc.) in 1943 and 1944. This is far cry from the pre-war standards of training , a good comparison can be found in Schneider's Panzer Tactics. The training of SS Panzer Regiment 12 can be described as very rushed, improvised and low resourced. Officer and NCO candidate crash courses for 17 and 18 year olds on the fly. This unit was raised from a group of veterans and transfers from the Heer, numbering only over a company who trained 16-18 year olds and Luftwaffe transfers. There is a severe lack of fuel, ammunition, vehicles, and AFVs to train on and it is implied that the men had a lot of free time and their training was intellectual and not sufficiently hands on as a consequence. Dozens of LW transfers were executed for desertion, there were executions among the HJ for theft, and there were deaths from training accidents.
Their unit training only starts in proper in 1944 with several unit maneuvers, the substance of which was limited by fuel shortages. There is an impression that there was a lot of downtime from the lack of resources and vocational expertise. Anyway, a useful model of what it was like. Certainly a veteran German unit coming to the West to rebuild would not have the same difficulties as a newly raised one as SS Panzer Regiment 12. The unit was considered ready shortly before D-Day, with the training of the Panther battalion lagging than of the Pz IV.
The photographs of training are interesting, and there are some from their April maneuvers. However it seems like a lot of personal accounts/photos were acquired from personal contacts, so a lot of other perspectives aren't included. I would have liked to have seen more details and photos from the other maneuvers noted in their unit diary.
-
- Member
- Posts: 3211
- Joined: 01 May 2006, 20:52
- Location: UK
Re: SS-Panzer-Regiment 12 in the Normandy
Are they recorded in the official documents?
Which accounts for their poor performance in the attack I suppose and the abysmal lack of combined arms tactics in the attack in particular.
I'd [still] be grateful if you could tell us what endnote 327 from page 306 says? It's the statement about not taking any prisoners.
Regards
Tom
-
- Member
- Posts: 8251
- Joined: 07 May 2002, 20:40
- Location: Teesside
Re: SS-Panzer-Regiment 12 in the Normandy
2 CAR kept detailed tank loss numbers. The total number of tanks they wrote off on June 7 was 15.Tom from Cornwall wrote: ↑17 Nov 2020, 21:53
There was only one Canadian armoured regiment at Authie on 7 June 1944 though wasn't there? Not 500, or even 100 tanks then.
2 of the losses were Stuart recce tanks.
12th SS total losses for June 7th were 12 Pz IV.
12th SS claimed 29 tank kills .
2 CAR claimed 41 tank kills.
The encounter, in terms of losses, seems to have been pretty even.
Those reading Szamveber's 'Waffen SS Armor In Normandy' might gain a different impression. Szamveber (page 40) footnotes Reynolds ( page 69 Steel Inferno) as 'confirming' that 2 CAR lost 28 tanks this day of which 21 were destroyed. It is clear that Reynolds read the June Appendix in the Sherbrooke's War Diary but he either can't read properly or wilfully misrepresented the numbers (as in conflating categories and double-counting) in the hope no one would check. I checked. Reynolds got it wrong. Reynolds also undercounts the 12th SS losses at 9 instead of 12.
-
- Member
- Posts: 8251
- Joined: 07 May 2002, 20:40
- Location: Teesside
Re: SS-Panzer-Regiment 12 in the Normandy
The original document is a count of all losses June 6th-11th. B Squadron in the only bit where there is no breakdown by date of the losses. It is entirely possible some of the B Squadron losses are from other dates.Richard Anderson wrote: ↑18 Nov 2020, 01:04B Squadron is murkier on dates, but lost 5 KO and 7 damaged, probably all on 7 June.