If you dont like me rebutting your posts, stop saying things that are deliberately childish. I dont post a lot on threads like this unless it is to call bullshit.Cult Icon wrote: ↑04 Sep 2022, 17:37I have your trolling on the ignore list. Put you on the ignore list once I saw your antics in the "Soviet concepts" thread. How many times have you quoted my posts? You quote my posts like an internet stalker.Tom Peters wrote: ↑04 Sep 2022, 17:34
....and you wonder why the RU sources are complete shit. [facepalm]
What are your 'special sources'. I see nothing. Provide sources and not extreme anti-Russian bias. Then when the trolling stops you will get a conversation with me.
Once again, whether you like it or not, using official RU or UKR MOD as sources of info is just plain dumb. Claiming "rumors say" some random crap like Bradley IFV are present in a battle doesnt add to our information, it just adds more noise instead of signal.
Sources ? How about Oryx ? Unique pictoral evidence along with geolocation where possible. Oh wait, is that extreme anti-Russian bias ? You dont like Oryx ? Try https://lostarmour.info/ and see if you get a different answer. Last time I checked they gave about the same tallies for UKR losses.
How about RU sources ? We can imply the degree of RU losses by the extreme measures the RU MOD is taking:
- greatly widening the age limits of enlistment
- massively increased enlistment bonuses
- bringing back retired personnel (General Kanamat Botashev) who were cashiered for incompetance
- increasing participation in private armies (Wagner)
- recruiting from prisons
These are Russian actions. Do you dispute any of them ?
Ignore me if you wish, I do not care. I dont want this forum to degrade into rumormongering sites like Freerepublic or moonofalabama.
Mad Dog