> The site of the presumed Bunker 1 is totally invented by Dragon
At least in this testimony we read only this:
«Five hundred [in actual fact 800] metres further on [from Bunker 2] there was another cottage designated Bunker 1.
800-500 meters is not that a great discrepancy. He didn't, you know, measure
> The day that one sq. mt. could accomodates 29 (i assumes here a medium) people, we will see also the pigs fly.
Sure you assume a "medium". You rig the figures to reach a desired "conclusion".
> Pressac says explictly "manifest exaggeration"
So what? Can you show that it's an exaggeration, and if an exaggeration, a big, significant one?
> But according to Auschwitz Museum reconstruction of this mythical adaption work from germans, the house have two doors and FOUR OPENINGS
OK, let's assume you don't lie and have not distorted anything. Perhaps it's a case of mistranslation. Perhaps just a bad memory. Did Dragon claim that he worked at Bunker 1?
> To sum up, Dragon don't known nothing about site, dimensions, dates, external aspect of this Bunker 1. And he was considered as one eyewitness....
This conclusion does not follow from the premises.