Id. aerial bombs

Discussions on all (non-biographical) aspects of the Luftwaffe air units and general discussions on the Luftwaffe.
Post Reply
Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17978
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 18:18
Location: Spain

Re: Id. aerial bombs

#571

Post by Sturm78 » 07 Mar 2021, 16:49

Hi all,

SD500 or PC1000 ??

Image from Ebay
Sturm78
Attachments
s-l1600 (53).jpg

Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17978
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 18:18
Location: Spain

Re: Id. aerial bombs

#572

Post by Sturm78 » 12 Mar 2021, 16:19

Nobody for my last image ?

Well, here another image from Ebay but the same question: SD500 or PC1000 ?? :?

Sturm78
Attachments
German SD500 or PC1000 bombs being unloaded from a truck1.jpg


User avatar
Grzesio
Member
Posts: 983
Joined: 11 Jul 2005, 15:55
Location: Poland
Contact:

Re: Id. aerial bombs

#573

Post by Grzesio » 12 Mar 2021, 16:35

I think, there are PC 1000 in both photos - sadly, location of the fuzes is invisible, so one cannot be 100% sure.

Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17978
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 18:18
Location: Spain

Re: Id. aerial bombs

#574

Post by Sturm78 » 12 Mar 2021, 21:13

Thanks, Grzesio ... :wink:

What does this Fw 190 carry on the underwing racks? :?

Image from Ebay
Sturm78
Attachments
Focke-Wulf Fw 190 ,,.jpg

User avatar
Grzesio
Member
Posts: 983
Joined: 11 Jul 2005, 15:55
Location: Poland
Contact:

Re: Id. aerial bombs

#575

Post by Grzesio » 12 Mar 2021, 21:21

Four triple Panzerschreck launchers, even the rockets can be seen. ;)

Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17978
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 18:18
Location: Spain

Re: Id. aerial bombs

#576

Post by Sturm78 » 13 Mar 2021, 19:24

Thanks for your help, Grzesio. :wink:

The image was`t of much quality....

Here another two images from Ebay.

Image 1: ??
Image 2: I think a SC1800 bomb

Sturm78
Attachments
German heavy bomb and soldiers ,-,.jpg
German SC1800 bomb and soldiers in field.jpg

User avatar
Grzesio
Member
Posts: 983
Joined: 11 Jul 2005, 15:55
Location: Poland
Contact:

Re: Id. aerial bombs

#577

Post by Grzesio » 15 Mar 2021, 10:41

The 1st one seems to be the SC 1000 L2, also marking of the fuze ElAZ (28) B2 is visible on the nose, what fits this bomb.

Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17978
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 18:18
Location: Spain

Re: Id. aerial bombs

#578

Post by Sturm78 » 19 Mar 2021, 16:56

Grzesio wrote
The 1st one seems to be the SC 1000 L2, also marking of the fuze ElAZ (28) B2 is visible on the nose, what fits this bomb.
Thanks, again, Grzesio :)

Regards
Sturm78

Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17978
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 18:18
Location: Spain

Re: Id. aerial bombs

#579

Post by Sturm78 » 25 Mar 2021, 00:46

Hi all,

Two another images from Ebay:

Image 1: SC1000 ?? Interesting to see the cables and pulleys to lift the bombs...
Image 2: SC50/SD50 or SD70 ?? :?

Sturm78
Attachments
s-l1600 (11).jpg
Heinkel He 111P, bombs and soldiers.jpg

User avatar
Grzesio
Member
Posts: 983
Joined: 11 Jul 2005, 15:55
Location: Poland
Contact:

Re: Id. aerial bombs

#580

Post by Grzesio » 25 Mar 2021, 11:22

Image 1: SC1000 ?? Interesting to see the cables and pulleys to lift the bombs...
The one on the left hand side seems to be a SC 500 J, the one on the right - SC 1000 L2 indeed.
Image 2: SC50/SD50 or SD70 ??
They are all SC 50, although their markings are extremely interesting.
They have their tail cones painted yellow in a very crude way, obviously in the field - so it most probably is 1940. The bomb on the right hand side is marked with a B (also it's SC 50 B, which was made until 1936 only), but the letter is strangely painted with a bright colour instead of black, plus quality class marking III is unusually offset to the side. The nose seems to be painted black (additional booster of pressed TNT) and the fuze marking is barely visible at the rear part of the body - so this bomb displays an unusual mixture of old and new markings. The bomb on the left hand side seems to be SC 50 JB (I think, there's small B visible), with early, big form of ElAZ (15) marking and quality class II painted with a bright colour instead of black (the shade seems to be the same as the yellow tail?!). Curiously, the HE code on the nose is invisible, but maybe it was painted just farther forward and is obscured.

Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17978
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 18:18
Location: Spain

Re: Id. aerial bombs

#581

Post by Sturm78 » 25 Mar 2021, 22:58

Thank you very much for your answers, Grzesio ... :wink:

Regards
Sturm78

ArmchairSamurai
Member
Posts: 179
Joined: 24 May 2016, 02:31
Location: Norway

Re: Id. aerial bombs

#582

Post by ArmchairSamurai » 27 Mar 2021, 22:39

I do not remember where I found this, and when trying to reverse search the image, nothing came up, so I am left perplexed.

Luckily the photo comes with a description. I think "Bätcher Wooden Bridge Burning Bomb" seems appropriate based on that. Does anyone know more on this albeit ad-hoc bomb configuration?
Attachments
Bätcher Wooden Bridge Burning Bomb.jpg
There are three sorts of people; those who are alive, those who are dead, and those who are at sea.

User avatar
Grzesio
Member
Posts: 983
Joined: 11 Jul 2005, 15:55
Location: Poland
Contact:

Re: Id. aerial bombs

#583

Post by Grzesio » 29 Mar 2021, 13:23

Well, one can be said for sure - the nose and the tail come from a BM 1000 mine, not the SC 1000 bomb. :P

Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17978
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 18:18
Location: Spain

Re: Id. aerial bombs

#584

Post by Sturm78 » 29 Mar 2021, 23:13

Hi Grzesio

Here, another image from a different point of view of my first image posted on 25 Mar 2021, identified by you as a SC 1000 L2
I think the bomb seems more pointed...perhaps a PC model ?? :?

Image from Ebay
Sturm78
Attachments
s-l1600 (21).jpg

User avatar
Grzesio
Member
Posts: 983
Joined: 11 Jul 2005, 15:55
Location: Poland
Contact:

Re: Id. aerial bombs

#585

Post by Grzesio » 30 Mar 2021, 10:27

You are right, so it's PC 1400 then.
PC 1000 was also very similar, but in its case the distance from the fuse to the forward edge of the tail cone was smaller than from the fuse to the suspension point (always 30 cm).

Post Reply

Return to “Luftwaffe air units and Luftwaffe in general”