Sea mines

Discussions on all (non-biographical) aspects of the Kriegsmarine except those dealing with the U-Boat forces.
Post Reply
Ruotsinsalmi
Member
Posts: 53
Joined: 22 Jan 2011, 19:52

Re: Sea mines

#121

Post by Ruotsinsalmi » 10 Apr 2015, 18:08

Hello Sturm78!

The ship is one of the finnish minelayers Riilahti or Ruotsinsalmi, laying the minefield named Rukajärvi A on 23.5.1942 at noon near Suursaari (Hogland) island. The only mention I could find about the mines, was one war diary mention of Ruotsinsalmi http://digi.narc.fi/digi/view.ka?kuid=2965539 saying "loading 91 mines of type S/38/II and 9 S/j". I do not know the types of finnish mines (one source is at the time not available), what I know, is that the big letter S means "saksalainen", that is "german"...EMC is one very good guess!

User avatar
Juha Tompuri
Forum Staff
Posts: 11563
Joined: 11 Sep 2002, 21:02
Location: Mylsä

Re: Sea mines

#122

Post by Juha Tompuri » 12 Apr 2015, 15:27

Ruotsinsalmi wrote:The ship is one of the finnish minelayers Riilahti or Ruotsinsalmi, laying the minefield named Rukajärvi A on 23.5.1942 at noon near Suursaari (Hogland) island. The only mention I could find about the mines, was one war diary mention of Ruotsinsalmi http://digi.narc.fi/digi/view.ka?kuid=2965539 saying "loading 91 mines of type S/38/II and 9 S/j".
I think it is minelayer Ruotsinsalmi, and for me it seems that there are three different type of mines, so the photos might be from laying also another minefield (Rukajärvi B?)

Image
EMC (Rukajärvi B?)
http://kotisivut.fonet.fi/~aromaa/Navyg ... etypes.htm
http://www.lexpev.nl/downloads/germanun ... es1946.pdf
Attachments
SA-kuva ruotsinsalmi.jpg
AFAIK nine German origin S/S1 mines ready to be going down first, the 91 Swedish origin S/38 II following
SA-kuva ruotsinsalmi.jpg (26.02 KiB) Viewed 15646 times


Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17980
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 18:18
Location: Spain

Re: Sea mines

#123

Post by Sturm78 » 13 Apr 2015, 16:50

Thank you for your answer, Juha,

I suppose that S/S1 was a Finnish designation, no ?? Do you know which was the German designation of this model?
Which was the Finnish designation for the EMC German mines?

On the other hand, I found this other image from SA-Kuva archive (91675). It is not a sea mine but a soviet depth charge.
Does anyone know his soviet designation and characteristics?

Sturm78
Attachments
G-5 torpedoboat depth charge. June 1942  91675-.jpg

Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17980
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 18:18
Location: Spain

Re: Sea mines

#124

Post by Sturm78 » 15 Apr 2015, 20:08

Hi all,

I am not sure about these mines : UMA or UMB German mines ??? :?

Image from SA-Kuva archive (93437)
Sturm78
Attachments
Ruotsinsalmi minelayer. June 1942  93437-.jpg

Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17980
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 18:18
Location: Spain

Re: Sea mines

#125

Post by Sturm78 » 19 Apr 2015, 20:09

Nobody for my last image ??

Well, here an image from EBay. I think a British Mark XIV mine, but I am not sure

Sturm78
Attachments
British Mark XIV mine.jpg

User avatar
Natter
Member
Posts: 1298
Joined: 19 Feb 2007, 22:43
Location: Bergen, Norway

Re: Sea mines

#126

Post by Natter » 19 Apr 2015, 20:26

Sturm78 wrote:I am not sure about these mines : UMA or UMB German mines ??? :?
Looks like UMA (not UMB - ref the anchor).

User avatar
Natter
Member
Posts: 1298
Joined: 19 Feb 2007, 22:43
Location: Bergen, Norway

Re: Sea mines

#127

Post by Natter » 19 Apr 2015, 20:32

Sturm78 wrote:Well, here an image from EBay. I think a British Mark XIV mine, but I am not sure
This type of cupola was used for several of the british systems, but given the lead acid-horns (or "hertz-horns"), I agree that this is most likely a Mk XIV (I assume we can't see the two horns on top as they have been crushed or just due to the angle of the photo).

Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17980
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 18:18
Location: Spain

Re: Sea mines

#128

Post by Sturm78 » 20 Apr 2015, 09:27

Thank you for your answers, Natter

Regards Sturm78

Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17980
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 18:18
Location: Spain

Re: Sea mines

#129

Post by Sturm78 » 28 Apr 2015, 17:39

Hi all,

Can somebody identify the model of these German mines ??

Image from SA-Kuva archive (98222)
Sturm78
Attachments
mines on German Raumboot. July 1942  98222-.jpg

User avatar
Natter
Member
Posts: 1298
Joined: 19 Feb 2007, 22:43
Location: Bergen, Norway

Re: Sea mines

#130

Post by Natter » 28 Apr 2015, 18:13

It's not mines, but sweep-obstructors: "Reißboje" (RB) or "Sprengboje" (Spr. BD).

The Reißboje has no explosive charge, just wirecutters on the anchoringwire below the buoy that will catch and cut the sweepwire of a mechanical sweep towed by a minesweeper.

The Sprengboje is similar in appearance, but has no wirecutters - only a small charge that will detonate by the force of a sweepwire on the anchorwire and thus cut the wire.

Judging by the size of the anchor, I'm pretty sure the objects in the photo are RB's as the Spr. BD anchor has a smaller "square box".

These would be dropped in front of the minelines to protect the minefield against enemy sweeping.

Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17980
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 18:18
Location: Spain

Re: Sea mines

#131

Post by Sturm78 » 28 Apr 2015, 19:21

8O Thank you very much for your help, Natter

I did not know these devices....

Are these cylinders, sea mines or another type of equipment ?? :?

Image from SA-Kuva archive (98231)
Sturm78
Attachments
Finnish Thornycroft torpedoboat. July 1942  98231-.jpg

User avatar
Natter
Member
Posts: 1298
Joined: 19 Feb 2007, 22:43
Location: Bergen, Norway

Re: Sea mines

#132

Post by Natter » 28 Apr 2015, 19:54

German torpedomines (ie to be launched from a standard 533,4mm torpedotube).

Not TMA (lacking the stabilizer fins), so either TMB or TMC: It's hard to estimate their lenght from the photo, but judging by the one on the left where you can see the position of the openings for the hydrostatic clock/boostercharge/timerclock, I'd say it's the slightly longer TMC.

Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17980
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 18:18
Location: Spain

Re: Sea mines

#133

Post by Sturm78 » 28 Apr 2015, 20:35

Thank you, again, Natter. :wink:

According to information I got on the net, the TMB have 2.3m long and the TMC measured 3.39m, so I think more in TMB model

Regards Sturm78

User avatar
Natter
Member
Posts: 1298
Joined: 19 Feb 2007, 22:43
Location: Bergen, Norway

Re: Sea mines

#134

Post by Natter » 28 Apr 2015, 21:24

Yes, that's correct!

I was consulting the US Navy Ordnance Pamphlet 1673A German Underwater Ordnance, Mines. The TMA, TMB and TMC is described on one page each and I was fooled by a sketch accompanying the description for the TMC, just assuming it was the TMC mine. I see now that it's in fact a drawing of the TMB ;-)

Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17980
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 18:18
Location: Spain

Re: Sea mines

#135

Post by Sturm78 » 18 May 2015, 09:17

Hi all,

UMA mines (I think) on Romanian minelayer

Image from EBay
Sturm78
Attachments
Romanian minelayer in Constanza-.jpg
Romanian minelayer in Constanza-.jpg (85.93 KiB) Viewed 15425 times
Romanian minelayer in Constanza.jpg
Romanian minelayer in Constanza.jpg (92.17 KiB) Viewed 15425 times

Post Reply

Return to “Kriegsmarine surface ships and Kriegsmarine in general”