7.62cm PaK 36(r)
7.62cm PaK 36(r)
Hi all,
Some images of 76.2mm M1936 Russian field guns modified by the germans for AT role: 7.62cm PaK 36(r)
Images from Ebay
Regards Sturm78
Some images of 76.2mm M1936 Russian field guns modified by the germans for AT role: 7.62cm PaK 36(r)
Images from Ebay
Regards Sturm78
- Attachments
-
- 7.62cm PaK 36(r) in action with germans troops. 76.2mm M1936 Russian field gun--3.JPG (59.99 KiB) Viewed 7016 times
-
- 7.62cm PaK 36(r) in action with germans troops. 76.2mm M1936 Russian field gun-2.JPG (66.2 KiB) Viewed 7016 times
-
- 7.62cm PaK 36(r) in action with germans troops. 76.2mm M1936 Russian field gun1.JPG (227.46 KiB) Viewed 7016 times
-
- Member
- Posts: 3370
- Joined: 19 Sep 2008, 14:44
Re: 7.62cm PaK 36(r)
The gun looked very low to me until I realised that they'd dug holes for the wheels !
Alan
Re: 7.62cm PaK 36(r)
Hello Sturm78
Nice gun and dito picture's .
All picture's from Ebay
Regards Jos
Nice gun and dito picture's .
All picture's from Ebay
Regards Jos
- Attachments
-
- 7.62 cm Pak 36 R.jpg (71.82 KiB) Viewed 7001 times
Re: 7.62cm PaK 36(r)
.....
- Attachments
-
- 7.62 pak R 36.jpg (141.11 KiB) Viewed 7001 times
-
- 7.62 Pak 36.jpg (74.88 KiB) Viewed 7001 times
- Andrzej Ditrich
- Member
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: 27 Sep 2004, 18:51
- Location: Gdansk/Sopot/Gdynia
- Contact:
Re: 7.62cm PaK 36(r)
Hello,
7.62 cm Pak 36 R.jpg
where could be this gun placed: Atlantikwall or Ostsee?
And the beach obstacles in the background-interesting
Brgds
@ndrew
7.62 cm Pak 36 R.jpg
where could be this gun placed: Atlantikwall or Ostsee?
And the beach obstacles in the background-interesting
Brgds
@ndrew
Re: 7.62cm PaK 36(r)
Gentlemen,
There was a discussion here about 7,62 cm Pak 36 and 39:
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... 0&t=143147
The consensus was that the Germans did not use the “(r)” in the designation as the guns had been modified from the original Russian models. It is the same with the 7,5 cm Pak 97/38 with no (f).
Here is a copy of a German document (from ebay.de) showing the designation without the “(r)”.
Emmanuel
There was a discussion here about 7,62 cm Pak 36 and 39:
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... 0&t=143147
The consensus was that the Germans did not use the “(r)” in the designation as the guns had been modified from the original Russian models. It is the same with the 7,5 cm Pak 97/38 with no (f).
Here is a copy of a German document (from ebay.de) showing the designation without the “(r)”.
Emmanuel
Re: 7.62cm PaK 36(r)
Hi all,
7.62cm Pak 36 ???
Image from Ebay
Sturm78
7.62cm Pak 36 ???
Image from Ebay
Sturm78
- Attachments
-
- 3.7cm Pak german AT gun and larger Russian Anti-Tank gun.jpg (82.95 KiB) Viewed 6758 times
Re: 7.62cm PaK 36
Yes, 7.62 cm Pak 36.
Here is another picture from ebay of these 2 guns. One of the 2 pictures has been inverted (unless the guns were moved in between).
Emmanuel
Here is another picture from ebay of these 2 guns. One of the 2 pictures has been inverted (unless the guns were moved in between).
Emmanuel
-
- Member
- Posts: 1288
- Joined: 06 Jun 2009, 23:38
Re: 7.62cm PaK 36(r)
Hi Emmanuel and Strum
I think Emmanuel is correct about Strum's image being inverted. The shield of a 3.7 cm Pak was higher on the layers side, left hand side. In photo Strum found on E-bay the raised part of the shield is on the right hand side of the gun.
I do wish people scan photos the right way round on E-bay. I saw an old post on another forum where there was an disagreement if a British carrier was a scout or a bren carrier.....no body had noticed the sign writting on the shop behind was back to front so how the hell could they tell what the vehicle was
I think Emmanuel is correct about Strum's image being inverted. The shield of a 3.7 cm Pak was higher on the layers side, left hand side. In photo Strum found on E-bay the raised part of the shield is on the right hand side of the gun.
I do wish people scan photos the right way round on E-bay. I saw an old post on another forum where there was an disagreement if a British carrier was a scout or a bren carrier.....no body had noticed the sign writting on the shop behind was back to front so how the hell could they tell what the vehicle was
Clive
Re: 7.62cm PaK 36(r)
Anyone else got any photos of these beauties in North Africa?
- Graham Clayton
- Member
- Posts: 485
- Joined: 31 Mar 2008, 12:29
- Location: South Windsor, NSW, Australia
- Contact:
Re: 7.62cm PaK 36(r)
The 7.62cm Pak36(r) was nicknamed "Ratschbumm", or "crash-boom", due to the sound of its firing and almost instant impact, due to the high velocity of the weapon.
An excellent example of this was during the British "Operation Slendour" at El Alamein on the 21st and 22nd of July.
The two guns in PZGrenadier Regiment 104's anti-tank platoon destroyed 9 and disabled 6 Valentine tanks of the 40th Royal Tank Regiment on Ruweisat Ridge in the space of a few minutes.
An excellent example of this was during the British "Operation Slendour" at El Alamein on the 21st and 22nd of July.
The two guns in PZGrenadier Regiment 104's anti-tank platoon destroyed 9 and disabled 6 Valentine tanks of the 40th Royal Tank Regiment on Ruweisat Ridge in the space of a few minutes.
"Air superiority is a condition for all operations, at sea, in land, and in the air." - Air Marshal Arthur Tedder.
Re: 7.62cm PaK 36(r)
Clive Mortimore wrote:Hi Emmanuel and Strum
I think Emmanuel is correct about Strum's image being inverted. The shield of a 3.7 cm Pak was higher on the layers side, left hand side. In photo Strum found on E-bay the raised part of the shield is on the right hand side of the gun.
I do wish people scan photos the right way round on E-bay. I saw an old post on another forum where there was an disagreement if a British carrier was a scout or a bren carrier.....no body had noticed the sign writting on the shop behind was back to front so how the hell could they tell what the vehicle was
I don't think the image is inverted. Look at the tree in relation to the guns.
-
- Member
- Posts: 3370
- Joined: 19 Sep 2008, 14:44
Re: 7.62cm PaK 36(r)
David, There is a thread on these guns on the DAK forum as it happens.David W wrote:Anyone else got any photos of these beauties in North Africa?
Alan
Re: 7.62cm PaK 36(r)
Amilcar,Amilcar wrote: I don't think the image is inverted. Look at the tree in relation to the guns.
Here the inverted picture that now shows the same position of the 2 guns relative to the tree in the background:
Emmanuel
Re: 7.62cm PaK 36(r)
From eBay.de.
Markus
Markus
- Attachments
-
- 310284761832.jpg (46.05 KiB) Viewed 6358 times