Aanti-partisan badge....Bandenkampfabzeichen

Discussions on Axis awards and decorations. Hosted by John G & William Kramer.
RF HONTS
Banned
Posts: 317
Joined: 09 Mar 2002 20:15
Location: ILLINOIS

Aanti-partisan badge....Bandenkampfabzeichen

Post by RF HONTS » 21 Apr 2002 20:19

This is a very rare badge. Issued by the Reichsführer on 30 January 1944, and awarded in February, 1945. Control was handed over to the Waffen SS in 42 and SS-Obergruppenführer von dem Bach-Zelewski was designated as Chief of the Anti-Partisan Warfare.

The piece was issued for fighting days accumulated. 20 for the bronze, 50 for the silver, and 150 for the gold.

Below are all of the Anti-Partisan badges, Bronze, Silver, Gold, and the cased example is with Diamonds

Roger

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Mark C. Yerger
In memoriam
Posts: 1153
Joined: 26 Mar 2002 19:40
Location: USA

Post by Mark C. Yerger » 21 Apr 2002 22:12

In studying units and personalities at various levels involved with anti-part duties, units or commands, its interesting how often the badge does not seem to have been awarded/recommended to people who qualified for it. The attractive diamonds version, unknown to me if actually awarded, I'd think would have gone to Prützmann or von dem Bach as the most senior ranked anti-part commanders. From a "look at" standpoint, it is more symbolic somehow in nature, the sunwheel being very subtle compared to most 3rd Reich awards and lack of an eagle interesting in the design, than many combat badges.

Mark

Keith Loughmiller
Banned
Posts: 377
Joined: 18 Apr 2002 00:52
Location: Indiana

Outstanding!

Post by Keith Loughmiller » 22 Apr 2002 01:17

Thank you Mr. Honts for posting those pictures. The AP with diamonds is outstanding. Is it from your collection? The diamond award is very rare, with only 20 examples having been made. Do you have any idea how many survived the war? How do you post pictures here? I will post pics of 2 of my APs for everyone to look at, and to keep this fine thread moving along.
Thanks

Keith Loughmiller
Banned
Posts: 377
Joined: 18 Apr 2002 00:52
Location: Indiana

1 more question

Post by Keith Loughmiller » 22 Apr 2002 01:19

Mr. Honts, are the diamonds set directly into the badge itself, or are they set into a seperate plate afixed to the badge?

RF HONTS
Banned
Posts: 317
Joined: 09 Mar 2002 20:15
Location: ILLINOIS

Hello

Post by RF HONTS » 22 Apr 2002 04:54

Hello,

All the above pieces are in my own collection.

To post photos, you first have to have a web server. Upload the photos into that particular site, and then post.

OR...if you would like I would be happy to post for you.

The diamonds are set directly into the badge.

Roger

RF HONTS
Banned
Posts: 317
Joined: 09 Mar 2002 20:15
Location: ILLINOIS

Mark

Post by RF HONTS » 22 Apr 2002 04:57

Mark,

In your extensive photo collection, do you have any photos of a SS man wearing this badge?

Roger

R. J. Kimmel
Banned
Posts: 531
Joined: 13 Mar 2002 19:49
Location: Good o'l USA

Viewers Judge For Yourself

Post by R. J. Kimmel » 22 Apr 2002 20:05

The following has been published in a French language publication. Should anyone be able interpret it would be great, however the photos speak for themselves. Just click on any of the below to view this information. You should also be able to print it out.

/RK


http://www.skalman.nu/upload/bka1.jpg
http://www.skalman.nu/upload/bka2.jpg
http://www.skalman.nu/upload/bka3.jpg
http://www.skalman.nu/upload/bka4.jpg
http://www.skalman.nu/upload/bka5.jpg
http://www.skalman.nu/upload/bka6.jpg

DickTracy
Banned
Posts: 24
Joined: 20 Apr 2002 19:07
Location: HALLS OF JUSTICE

Post by DickTracy » 22 Apr 2002 20:22

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Who knows What Evil Lurks in the Hearts of Men? Dick knows.
[email protected]

R. J. Kimmel
Banned
Posts: 531
Joined: 13 Mar 2002 19:49
Location: Good o'l USA

Post by R. J. Kimmel » 22 Apr 2002 20:31

Mr. Tracy... thank you for helping me to show the images. I had experieced problems in doing so.

/RK

DickTracy
Banned
Posts: 24
Joined: 20 Apr 2002 19:07
Location: HALLS OF JUSTICE

Post by DickTracy » 22 Apr 2002 20:37

Merci. Vous êtes la plupart de bienvenue.
Who knows What Evil Lurks in the Hearts of Men? Dick knows.
[email protected]

User avatar
Macmedal
Member
Posts: 1599
Joined: 17 Mar 2002 01:03
Location: GB

Post by Macmedal » 22 Apr 2002 21:00

Roger

I have to say this must be one of the most confusing and difficult to verify badges. I have been under the impression that the regular Gold Silver and bronze grade badges came in either solid back or semi hollow backed. The type you illustrate as the Bronze and Silver fully hollow backed with the impression of the oakleaves I believed to be reproduction.

I am still learning so I need to clarify a few points.

Apart from the special grade Gold and Brillianten versions ( fantastic boxed award!) were all standard awards either made in zinc alloy or tombac?

Where any made in 800 silver?

Where they all die stamped or were any die Cast?

I have put a couple of pictures of awards.
First I believe to be original possibly silver class made of zinc alloy and slightly damaged. This I believe to be die cast due to file marks and possible casting line. However front definition is very detailed.

The second I believe to be repro marked 800 on reverse. Definition on front just is lacking and I am not aware of any 800 silver?

Has any one got any measurements for original pieces?

Mr Stump come back we need you !!!!

Image

Image

Image
Image
Image

RF HONTS
Banned
Posts: 317
Joined: 09 Mar 2002 20:15
Location: ILLINOIS

Hello

Post by RF HONTS » 22 Apr 2002 22:19

Hello,

VERY good question. The Bronze and Silver that I illustrate are semi hollow backed. They are a stamped piece. The gold that I illustrate is considered hollow backed.

ALL the pieces are die stamped, and none were cast.

The only Anti-P badge that was marked 800 was the piece in Brilliants.

Roger

RF HONTS
Banned
Posts: 317
Joined: 09 Mar 2002 20:15
Location: ILLINOIS

information

Post by RF HONTS » 23 Apr 2002 02:50

I know that WC Stump has some good information on this badge. He has showed me his research, and is most interesting.

Maybe if NOT provoked, he might consider posting again?

Roger

WCSTUMP
In memoriam
Posts: 1570
Joined: 11 Mar 2002 22:35
Location: HARLAN COUNTY, KENTUCKY

NOT WRITTEN IN STONE - BELEIVE IT OR NOT

Post by WCSTUMP » 23 Apr 2002 03:09

ANTI-PARTISAN WAR BADGE
(BANDENKAMPFABZEICHEN)

Is It Real?

By: W. C. Stump

One of the most interesting and desirable of all combat badges issued by the Third Reich is the Anti-Partisan War Badge. It is also one of the most widely reproduced badge found on today’s collectors market. I just acquired an original gold example from a local W.W.II veteran and found it to be of a different strike than I have ever seen. It is unmarked, but has characteristics of two or more known makers that produced this badge during the brief 15-month period in which it was issued. Therefore, I would like to share the information I have accumulated over my years of collecting combat badges of the Third Reich, as well as that of other noted collectors, and in particular those who have covered the Anti-Partisan War Badge in references that they authored. Hopefully the answer to the question “Is it Real?” will be answered at the conclusion of this article.

Partisan fighters from all the occupied nations controlled by the armies of Nazi Germany immediately struck back at the invading German forces. The military branches of the Wehrmacht immediately engaged them, in turn. In October of 1942 Waffen S. S. Obergruppenfurher von dem Bach-Zelewski took over as Chief of Anti-Partisan Warfare. However, it was not until late January of 1944 that Himmler, Chief of the S. S., instituted a special war badge to recognize the service of the troops engaged in this type of combat. Most all recipients were recognized for their extremely dangerous service combating the partisans and guerrilla fighters, especially in the Balkans and behind the lines on the Eastern Front. The award came in three grades, bronze (for 20 days of active service), silver (for 50 days), and gold, (for 150 days). The awarding of this badge was not restricted only to the Waffen S. S., but the authority for recommendation was delegated down to the OKH, OKL, OKM as well as police leadership. (The Luftwaffe personnel were also eligible to receive this award but the bronze class required 30 operational sorties, 75 sorties to receive the silver class and 150 sorties to receive the gold class. If an enemy aircraft was shot down during a mission, that sortie counted as three.)

To the best of my knowledge the exact number of manufactures and specific types of the Anti-Partisan War Badge are still unknown after over fifty years as well as the number of badges awarded. This is due to the period of manufacture and limited number of the badges being awarded. Compare the number of personnel qualified to be awarded this badge with the number of Luftwaffe Pilots badges produced and awarded; or the Infantry Assault Badges, Tank Assault, or any other combat badges produced and awarded during W. W. II. Hard facts show that this badge was given to only a select few in a theater of the world where many recipients never returned and that the time the badges were issued was extremely short compared to all the other combat badges. Add the S. S. element, the sinister look with the serpents and dagger, and the popularity of collecting these items and logic dictates that one must understand why they are reproduced to the degree that they are today. It’s a simple fact that the demand far outweighs the supply and the greed for the dollar tend to cause the unscrupulous to crank out the reproductions by the hundreds. Each year they produce higher quality reproductions to snare the unwary collector.

I will try to point out the different original types of the Anti-Partisan War Badges that I personally know to exist. I am sure, especially after my latest acquisition; probably more examples or variations lie in some veteran’s souvenir chests just waiting to be discovered by today’s enthusiastic collectors.

I first want to acknowledge five noted collectors and authors and their books on the subject of Third Reich war badges: Ltc. (Ret.) John R. Angolia (For Furher and Fatherland, volume 1, pages 106-108), David Littlejohn and Col. C. M. Dodkins (Orders, Decorations, Medals and Badges of the Third Reich), Page 156, Adrian Foreman (Forman’s Guide to Third Reich German Awards...And Their Values, Second Edition), pages 88 and 89, and Michael F. Tucker (Collecting Military Badges of the Third Reich).

I especially want to acknowledge the information provided to me for so many years by my late friend, Dr. Phil. Kurt-Gerhard Klietmann. His legacy as one of the most knowledgeable authorities on the subject of orders and decorations of the world, and his Institute for the Scientific Research of Orders will live on forever.

The first type of the Anti-Partisan War Badge is attributed to the firm of C. E. Junkers, Berlin. I once owned the badge pictured on page 106 of For Furher and Fatherland, Volume 1. It was a semi-hollow back with a “needle” type pin with cut out serpents. The years have erased my memory as to whether it was marked or not, but I distinctly recall that I showed this badge to Dr. Klietmann and he stated to me that it was of C. E. Junkers manufacture. One important feature that is found on the C. E. Junkers badge that is never observed on any other type is the fang of the serpent on the top left. Its fang is part of the cutout and the head of the serpent doesn’t touch its body that is wrapping around the blade of the sword. The cutout of the fang is more obvious in the flat back variation than in the semi-hollow back. (See copies No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, and 9) Another obvious feature is the sword handle appears to be twisted. One extremely rare version was manufactured in aluminum. I have owned one of these very rare badges. C. E. Junkers pioneered the use of aluminum. (The

Another semi-hollow back variation that I have owned was almost identical to the C. E. Junkers badge, but had the number “4” stamped on the pin. This was the identification number used by the firm of Steinhaur & Luck, Ludenscheid. I have no photograph of that badge. However, a near perfect reproduction this type badge bearing the hallmark “4” in the center of a brass, not steel, pin is coming out of Germany. It can be easily identified by looking at the reverse, the thin stamped hollow back, (Note: No Anti-Partisan War Badges were produced with a stamped full hollow back.), the type of pin and catch, and by the type of material it is produced from. Also, the serpents have four cutouts, a mark of all reproductions I have encountered.

The second type is exactly like type one, but with a wide flat pin with L/12 (the war time code for C. E. Junkers, Berlin) stamped on the pin. I inspected a badge of this badge in a collection in England in the early 1970’s. I have also observed the same type badge, but without any markings. Again, note the fang and open mouth of the serpent. (See aforementioned copies)

The third type is of solid construction and had a “needle” type pin and was exactly like the observe of the first and second types. (See copies No. 6 and 8 - typical “needle pin”) Most Anti-Partisan War Badges encountered have the “needle pin”

The fourth type is exactly like the third, but had a flat pin and neither the third or fourth types were marked as to the maker. (See copy No. 2)

The fifth types are badges manufactured by other manufactures. It seems that competition still flourished as the war was coming to an end and various manufactures produced the Anti-Partisan War Badge. I had an example of the Anti-Partisan badge manufactured by the firm of Robert Hauschild, Pforzheim, who used the LDO number L/56 and is the only manufacture to use four cut-outs on the serpents. See page 106 of For Furher and Fatherland, Volume 1, for a picture of the badge I once owned. (See copy No. 6) Also make note that a new reproduction of this type of badge, produced in all three classes, has recently entered the country from Austria and Germany (See copy No. 11) as well as a cast copy also being offered from Germany. (See copy No. 12)

The sixth type is badges identical to type number five, but have no markings. I think that more than one manufacture produced this type of badge. I base this on the fact that minor details in the die strikes indicate that different dies were used. Considering the relatively short time that these badges were produced it is highly unlikely that a particular firm would have two dies for the same badge. Both the “Junkers”, Hauschild and my newly acquired variation have a long slender hilt on the sword. I have noticed that in other examples the hilt is larger and fuller in the center. (See page 156 of Orders, Decorations, Medals and Badges of the Third Reich.) (See copy No. 3)

The seventh type is the rarest of all Anti-Partisan War Badges and was produced by the firm of C. E. Junkers, Berlin. They are covered in detail by Adrian Foreman on page 88 of his book, Foreman’s Guide to Third Reich German Awards... And Their Values, 2nd Edition. These badges were the Deluxe Special Grade 111 in gold and awarded only four times by H. Himmler on the 15th of February 1945. (See page 108 of For Fuhrer and Fatherland for a picture of one of the presentation documents for this badge.) The badges were custom made, convex, heavy gold plated tombak with blue steel finish on the sword blade and finely cut-out serpents. To my knowledge, only one example exists today and it is in a private collection in England. (No photo available)

The eighth type was the Special grade of the Anti-Partisan War Badge in Gold and Diamonds 1944-45. Forman states on page 89 of his book Foreman’s Guide to Third Reich German Awards.... And Their Values, 2nd edition that twenty examples in silver-gilt with diamonds were produced, but never awarded. I have never seen an example of this type. (No photo available)

The above is a lot for anyone to try and remember when encountering an Anti-Partisan badge for the first time and don’t know what to look for to determine if it is real or fake. Therefore, here are some valuable things to look for that will help to avoid making a mistake and to answer the question “Is it real?”

1. Observe the type of material of which the badge was produced. If it is made of any other material other than tombak, kriegsmetal, and in the extremely rare case if aluminum, chances are that it is a reproduction. However, this alone doesn’t make the badge original wartime produced. Some reproductions are being made of similar looking material.

2. Check the back of the badge, especially the pin and catch. Look how it is affixed to the badge. Observe the type of pin and catch. Since all Anti-Partisan badges were produced in either tombak or kriegsmetal, affixing a pin and catch on this type of late war material was different than employed on other materials used earlier in the war. Michael J. Tucker covers this procedure quite well on page 44 of his book. The “C” type catch was affixed to a separate metal plate prior to the two parts being affixed to the badge. If one encounters an Anti-Partisan War Badge with the “C” catch soldered directly to the back of the badge is can safely be considered to be a reproduction. (See copy No. 2, 6, and 8) 99% of all original badges have steel pins and are affixed directly to the badge without employing a steel plate. However, some manufactures produced the pins of bronze or other metals other than of steel.

I would like to discuss the three different materials used during the late war years and of what they were composed. Also I want to point out what one should look for in determining the difference between them.

Tombak is an Alloy of copper, zinc, and tin. The color appears to be that of bronze. This type of material was used in many badges after 1943. The firm of C. E. Junkers used tombak for a brief period for their Anti-Partisan War Badges, but kriegsmetal was used most.

Britannia is an Alloy of antimony and copper. Often called “white metal”. One of the characteristics of this metal is that one can buff or polish it, thus giving it an appearance of nickel silver. This metal was used ever increasingly from middle 1942, with a peak use in 1943, until the end of the war. I have never encountered an Anti-Partisan War Badge produced in britannia, but it is possible that some were.

Kriegsmetal is an alloy of zinc, lead and copper. This metal was used very late in the war and the color was dark gray, almost looking like lead. Copper was a scarce commodity and its use was limited in badges after 1943. The percentage of lead and zinc compared to the copper content were greater in kriegsmetal giving it the look of lead. Dipping or “washing” as the last process of production applied the various finishes. After only very little use the badges quickly lost their finish and appeared to be made of lead. I have had badges made of kriegsmetal stored in display cases where the “washed” finish oxidized and faded and fell off at the touch. I always avoided these badges when I could get an early war produced example. I am not alone in avoiding or adding a kriegsmetal badge to my collection. Many other collectors avoid these badges, often considering them to be fake. However, many of the rarest badges of this period, particularly the Anti-Partisan War Badges, were constructed of the above described metal. It is important to take note and remember this as I continue.

Michael F. Tucker’s new book deals with how to detect if a badge is original or reproduction. His book, Collecting Military Badges of the Third Reich, should be a part of every collector’s reference library today. I have read his book and in my opinion it one of the best on the market dealing with detecting original badges from reproductions. While I am a firm believer that no single source is 100% correct in it’s content, I would have to give Mr. Tucker 95% for his efforts. I suggest that one refer to the chapters dealing with types of materials, pins and catches in his book.

The pin and catch on an original Anti-partisan War Badge MUST conform to the manner the manufactures used at the time to affix the pins and catches to both tombak and kriegsmetal badges.

We are now back to the haunting question: Is it real? If you acquire an item from a veteran, knowledgeable collector, or reputable dealer who will give a “life time” guarantee, you start out with a 99% chance the items is original. However, know your source as the most important advice I can offer. I’ve encountered hundreds of “veterans” who “personally took” post war combat badges off a dead enemy soldier or POW. Other stories are “my father, uncle or brother” brought this rare, but fake, badge back from the “Great World War Two.” It used to be in the 1950’s and 1960’s that a collector had three criteria that he followed when adding items to his collection. First, he looked at the condition, next the price, and originality was last. I have noticed today that the first thing a collectors asks himself “Is it real?” Then he looks the condition and the price is at the end of the list.

I am afraid that by the end of the next decade, a beginning collector will have to turn to Scotland Yard, the F. B. I., and the best forensic laboratories that can be found to determine what is real and what is fake. Hopefully, I will be wrong, but the quest for the all mighty dollar and man’s inherent greed seems to overshadow the quest to keep the past alive by searching for that original elusive war relic from the past. It also keeps us all reaching for the provable “brass ring” on the merry-go-around of war relic collecting. In conclusion, I know my source for my latest find and I can lie down with a worry free mind that it absolutely original in every way. But, when my Anti-Partisan War Badge next passes into another collectors hands, will he have to ask “Is it real”? Probably so because that is the most important question that a collector must ask himself as he prepares to inter into the collecting arena of the new millennium.
PHOTO REFERENCE
Refer to the appropriate aforementioned references for clear detailed photograph.


THE DIE STRUCK ZINC BADGE LATER IDENTIFIED AS A C. E. JUNKER EARLY BADGE.

Image

Sven Kondor
Banned
Posts: 206
Joined: 15 Apr 2002 19:55
Location: Liechtenstein

Real or not?

Post by Sven Kondor » 23 Apr 2002 06:59

Well Mr. Stump I see you are back. Where are the Katzajammer Kids? I would like to have your opionion of Mr Houts four badges posted above.Real or not. Simple question=simple answer. Please.

Return to “Axis Awards”