Completely disagree to much of what you wrote. Lets take a few cases:
----
Unlike OSINT nerds I believe that those of us who study large scale warfare in the WW2 or Soviet POV have certain advantages over these people even if we do not specialize in modern warfare.
----
Unless you happen to have professional G-2/S-2 experience, you are kidding yourself. Being an amateur historian by itself only gives us a veneer of understanding to much of what is going on. The Russian army of today in no way compares to the Russian army of 1945. THe current performance is very poor.
---
for instance we know that tank battalions have low personnel losses compared to infantry units, with all or a portion of the crews escaping knocked out vehicles.
---
Unless the crew is from a T-series tank, where they have a high chance of being turned into charcoal. Notice how many T-series tanks look like they have orange paint on them ? Thats from a catastrophic burn out where the steel loses its temper from high heat. Modern ATGM are absolute murder on T-series tanks.
You are also using far too much assumption in terms of staffing. For example what makes you think RU units have spare tank crews ? Endemic corruption in the RU army has left many units with empty slots.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9i47sgi-V4&t=2s
---
The 'giant Russian deaths' propaganda began sometime in the first week of the war, sometime afterward the Ukr General staff produced fake numbers where they had a 10 to 1 kill ratio and 90 percent of Russian casualties were KIA (lol).
---
...which is why I dont use the UKR official figures. 30K dead RU implies 120K wounded (150K total), which would be a total of 75% of the starting RTU forces. That doesnt compute. 10K ? Sounds reasonable, without trying to determine P/P ratios and casualty rates.
http://www.dupuyinstitute.org/blog/2022 ... ed-part-1/
I dont use the UKR figure, so dont you use the RU sources.
---
Ukraine's combat performance is less than the Russian.
---
You must be joking. UKR was a second rate local power, and its punching way over its weight against RU. See any RU units near Kiev ? No ? How is the conquest of Kharkov going ? Not so good ? How is the Moskva doing at the bottom of the Black Sea ? When the RU "big" offensive started last month, did they take Severodonetsk ? No ? Been a month going on, even playing to RU strengths, and still no victory.
Dont get me wrong, I think the RU will take the city, but I bet they are paying a price in ghastly casualties for it.
Here is an interview from an American (one of the more famous ones) who fought in UKR (part 1 of 4):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNXkc07ihiY&t=1s
--
Connected to this is how it is not impressive that the Russians do not have a large tactical superiority over defending Ukrainian units when they assault and must use their fire superiority to wear them down resulting in snail like advances.
---
Impressive ? How can it be impressive that a supposedly better trained force (your words), with far more equipment, with a huge advantage in position, naval and air power, finds itself dying in UKR. The RU forces in UKR are paying a price in casualties. We know this because:
Putin was asking for Syrians to come and fight
Putin is using the Wagner group
RU just raised the age limit to infinity (no age limit) for military service
Kanamat Botashev (63 year old retired air force general) was killed while flying a Su-25 in service
Large numbers of Colonels and Generals are dead, at a rate far higher than conventional combat rates would dictate
These are all confirmed by RU sources.
RU needs manpower bad.
---
if the biased Orxy blog is correct, who is probably an agent of Ukrainian psych-ops- his blog appeared in the first days of the war with tons of photographs.
---
Look at the UKR loss claims from Oryx (pro-UKR) and lostarmour (pro RU). Both are doing the same activity. Tell me what you find.
---
I would not rely on some stranger on the internet for accurate data
---
Then why do you peddle internet data from RU internet sources ?
Mad Dog