The defence of Narva-the final countdown of army group NORTH

Discussions on WW2 in Eastern Europe.
User avatar
pennywise
Member
Posts: 12
Joined: 25 Jul 2003, 02:17
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria

The defence of Narva-the final countdown of army group NORTH

#1

Post by pennywise » 31 Jul 2003, 01:15

Do u think that the battle for Narva is the real end of army group "North"?
At first - the Leningrad's siege(3 years),then the defence of Narva(3 months),then the battle for Courland peninsula...
The great army North, which soldiers fought bravely and long was fall...

User avatar
Benoit Douville
Member
Posts: 3184
Joined: 11 Mar 2002, 02:13
Location: Montréal

#2

Post by Benoit Douville » 31 Jul 2003, 04:27

You have a valid point because the Battle of Narva in the Baltic was important because the soldiers of Wiking Division, I guess that's what you are talking about... were defending that land with all the courage they had but after that, even if they fought very bravely until the end of the War it was over. Operation Bagration by the Red Army was succesfull.

Regards


User avatar
pennywise
Member
Posts: 12
Joined: 25 Jul 2003, 02:17
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria

#3

Post by pennywise » 31 Jul 2003, 06:25

Oui, Benoit, but Hitler didn't gave a permission to VIKING to retreat, and they , like a 100%germans (but there was non-german soldiers) fought against the red army, defending the peninsula(why?) that wasn't a strategic land......

User avatar
Superfinnish
Member
Posts: 18
Joined: 30 Jul 2003, 15:48
Location: Sweden,Europea

#4

Post by Superfinnish » 31 Jul 2003, 07:48

Was in it the Estonians(1944?) who tried to fhight the Russians at Narva?

//Martin

User avatar
Polynike
Member
Posts: 524
Joined: 12 Mar 2002, 23:14
Location: Gibraltar

#5

Post by Polynike » 01 Aug 2003, 00:41

Isnt the battle of Narva called the battle of the european SS due to the number of foreign legions that fought there. anybody got any links to sites or pics about the battle?

User avatar
Benoit Douville
Member
Posts: 3184
Joined: 11 Mar 2002, 02:13
Location: Montréal

#6

Post by Benoit Douville » 01 Aug 2003, 01:17

Yep, it was a strategic land because the majority of the soldiers of the Panzer Grenadier Nordland Division who fought that Battle from February to August 1944 in Narva, Estonia were from European SS Volonteers and a lot of them from the Baltic State, that land was important for them.

Regards
Last edited by Benoit Douville on 29 Jan 2006, 19:06, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Hans N
Member
Posts: 292
Joined: 01 Apr 2002, 16:40
Location: Sweden

#7

Post by Hans N » 01 Aug 2003, 18:44

They protected their Iron-core transports from Sweden, that Germany was relying on to produce its weapons from. One of the Russian goals was to take the port in Libau that the "Germanische" volunteers did all they could do to stop.

Best Regards
Hans N

Peeter
Member
Posts: 208
Joined: 26 Feb 2003, 19:05
Location: Estland

Narva

#8

Post by Peeter » 02 Sep 2003, 18:19

At first, there was not the Wiking division operating at Narva, but Nordland, 20.SS (Estonian) and of course some German units, so very international (soldiers from Estonia, Gemany, Norway, Holland, Denmark and Sweden).
For soldiers the question was definitely not the swedish iron- there was a border between Europe and Russia, that`s why they fought so desperately. For German headquarters, of course the question was to keep the Baltic Sea.
Cheers

Gille
Member
Posts: 108
Joined: 12 Jun 2003, 11:08
Location: New Zealand

#9

Post by Gille » 03 Sep 2003, 08:03

Hi I would like to recommend Wilhem tiekes book;Tragedy of the Faithful as a very informative and good read on this subject.Many different units and nationalities fought together showing much bravery in a hopeless battle against overwhelming odds.Even Estonian woman manned the mortars.Individuals such as Oberleutnant Otto Carius carried out feats of incredible daring.Belgium troops fought here too.

User avatar
Andy H
Forum Staff
Posts: 15326
Joined: 12 Mar 2002, 21:51
Location: UK and USA

#10

Post by Andy H » 03 Sep 2003, 13:50

The battles fought in the Courland were a waste of men & material that Germany needed elsewhere.

Andy H

User avatar
Hans N
Member
Posts: 292
Joined: 01 Apr 2002, 16:40
Location: Sweden

#11

Post by Hans N » 03 Sep 2003, 15:08

If they hadn´t stand their ground, the Russians had entered Germany much earlier!

User avatar
Andy H
Forum Staff
Posts: 15326
Joined: 12 Mar 2002, 21:51
Location: UK and USA

#12

Post by Andy H » 03 Sep 2003, 18:40

If they hadn´t stand their ground, the Russians had entered Germany much earlier!
If this is in relation to Courland I think your mistaken.

The usual arguement is that it tied down Russian forces-Well yes that is true but what quantative effect did this have on Russia's ability to enter Germany, argueably none. It was more a case of Russian tunnel vision if you like that they would destroy this German force on it's land (Post'39)

The Russians might as awell have left just a minor force to defend the perimeter, because what could the German forces do from there?. They could attack but where to and for what goal that could be held against overwhelming force that Russia could bring to bear.

Better that the troops were along the Oder etc. Yes they wouldn't have staved of the deafeat but Germany would have kept going a bit longer.

Andy H

User avatar
Hans N
Member
Posts: 292
Joined: 01 Apr 2002, 16:40
Location: Sweden

#13

Post by Hans N » 03 Sep 2003, 20:33

Better that the troops were along the Oder etc. Yes they wouldn't have staved of the deafeat but Germany would have kept going a bit longer.
Not so shure about that, coz every feet the Russians gained the harder they fought! The German forces fought for their lifes and familys! The beleaves in The Third Reich was thinning out for every day that passed.
Germany was counting on that the western allies would continue the war but against the Russians!

User avatar
Benoit Douville
Member
Posts: 3184
Joined: 11 Mar 2002, 02:13
Location: Montréal

#14

Post by Benoit Douville » 04 Sep 2003, 03:12

I agree, The Red Army suffered for almost every yard they gained in Kurland and I don't think it was a waste of men and material for Germany. The combat troops were more fanatic than in 1941 when they invaded the Soviet Union!

Regards
Last edited by Benoit Douville on 29 Jan 2006, 05:33, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Robert Rojas
In memoriam
Posts: 2658
Joined: 19 Nov 2002, 05:29
Location: Pleasant Hill, California - U.S.A.
Contact:

RE: The Defense of Narva & Final Countdown of A.G.N.

#15

Post by Robert Rojas » 04 Sep 2003, 06:41

Greetings to both citizen Polynike and the community as a whole. In regards to your inquiry of Thursday - July 31, 2003 - 11:41am, old Uncle Bob would like to recommend the following work of literature which, in part, covers the events gravitating on the defensive action or actions in and around Narva. The work in question is entitled as RETREAT FROM LENINGRAD: Army Group North 1944/1945. The author is Steven H. Newton and the publisher is Schiffer Publishing Limited of Atglen, Pennsylvania. The publishing year is 1995. This literary work delves into the subject with a respectable degree of specificity. I believe you will find Steven H. Newton's effort of relevance to your particular interests. ENJOY! In anycase, I would like to bid you a wonderful day at the Pillars of Hercules.

Best Regards,
Uncle Bob :)

Post Reply

Return to “WW2 in Eastern Europe”