Human Soap Again

DEZERTER · Post by **DEZERTER** » 23 Sep 2003 01:31

So why do you think that nazis did not make human soap?

Do you say that nazis were not cruel enough to make human soap?
Or do you say that they did not have the technology to do so?
Or was it not profitable to make it?
Or does it sound too science fiction?

Now if you ask why I think nazis made human soap...
Its because there are countless witnesses who say nazis did, and also because there is still plenty of that soap left in museums. I'm sure its been subject to many scientific tests to prove its human origin. You know, the technology is out there. It would have been disproved by it if only that was possible.
Now wait, maybe your next answer will be: Its government propaganda, that soap was made after the war by the governments of certain countries.
Right, so 10 different eastern european countries conspired together to make human soap? One day russians said: Okay everybody, now we all make human soap to show the world how cruel nazis were. And why would they have to create propaganda about nazi cruelty, when after the war everybody knew about it anyway, and the war was already won, so why convince people that nazis were bad, when they were already defeated? And what about during the war? No, there were no propaganda posters of germans making human soap, as a matter of fact, most of the public (especially in the USA) knew nothing about concentration camps and other cruelties. The real truth came out only after the war.

Scott Smith · Post by **Scott Smith** » 23 Sep 2003 03:10

DEZERTER wrote:Its because there are countless witnesses who say nazis did, and also because there is still plenty of that soap left in museums. I'm sure its been subject to many scientific tests to prove its human origin.

Where is this Human Soap? Let's test it! Or show me a modern scientific test showing that it is Human.

This just proves that there are countless people who are willing to repeat urban legends, or even LIE about it, if it makes a good story. The truth need not be true if the story has didactic value, right? Rather Old Testament, I think.

Here is the Human Soap "evidence" from the International Military Tribunal:

Nazi Soap on a Rope!

Any other evidence? Discuss...

DEZERTER · Post by **DEZERTER** » 23 Sep 2003 03:44

If you dont believe in the story, tell me why.
Just because I don't have hard proof for it, it doesnt mean that it was not made. What about testimonies? What about recipes found? What about the same kind of soap found in so many countries? You don't listen to my arguments, or you don't want to comprehend them. Address all the premises I brought up in my previous posts before you make your conclusion. If you don't, then that just proves that you believe what you want to believe.
You don't think that nazi pigs were cruel enough to do it?
Whats your reason to believe they didnt make it?

David Thompson · Post by **David Thompson** » 23 Sep 2003 03:59

DEZERTER · Post by **DEZERTER** » 23 Sep 2003 04:02

When it known that human skin was used to make book covers (many of those are in private and public collections today), when gold teeth were ripped out of dead skulls to be melted down and sold, when clothes of dead people were shipped out to germany, when human fat was used to make candles (read "Slaughterhouse 5"), when Himmler personally had a load of things made from human skeletons (yes Himmler was an obsessed maniac, he believed that in his previous life he was a germanic king, and did a ton of crazy stuff, read his biography, its interesting and also pathetic). When hair collected from executed women was made into sleeping mattresses, THEN THEY MIGHT AS WELL HAVE MADE SOAP FROM HUMAN FAT! It seems to fit the pattern.
(By the way, all of these human products can be seen in museums in Poland.)

ChristopherPerrien · Post by **ChristopherPerrien** » 23 Sep 2003 05:10

Interested readers can find no less than 8 previous threads dedicated to this contentious subject at:

David I award you the "Cool-head" award, dealing with this topic.

Dezerter, to save you the trouble , I waded though a couple of those dirty topics as they were being written and judging by what our best posters said,

I think one crazy nazi doctor at some place called the Spanner institute used between 1 to 7 dead bodies to make soap. It was not on some vast commercial scale or a big nazi plan. Just one nut-case professor with at least enough Nazi authority to be able to use a lab and a few bodies for this grisy experiment.

Real soap is made from animal fat so there is no doubt soap can be made from any animal be it man, horse, cow, etc. And I do think this one doctor did it at a Nazi lab during the war on a few bodies, that is all I could figure out or at least that is what seemed honest to me .

Feel free to look at those topics but it will be tedious to say the least.
Now I await some wraith as I probably opened this box of soap again.

Welcome to the Forum

Kalgon take me away!

demonio · Post by **demonio** » 23 Sep 2003 06:11

They did attempt to.

I believe it was done at danzig as a one off

Dan · Post by **Dan** » 23 Sep 2003 15:45

demonio wrote:They did attempt to.

I believe it was done at danzig as a one off

Why don't you and Dezerter read through those threads? Then either one of you can come back and speak intellegently about the subject rather than perpetuate slander.

demonio · Post by **demonio** » 23 Sep 2003 15:51

Dan wrote:
demonio wrote:They did attempt to.

I believe it was done at danzig as a one off
Why don't you and Dezerter read through those threads? Then either one of you can come back and speak intellegently about the subject rather than perpetuate slander.

Stop trying to insult my intelligence. Fool

Dan · Post by **Dan** » 23 Sep 2003 16:02

Stop trying to insult my intelligence. Fool

How is that possible?

xcalibur · Post by **xcalibur** » 23 Sep 2003 16:06

Dan wrote:
demonio wrote:They did attempt to.

I believe it was done at danzig as a one off
Why don't you and Dezerter read through those threads? Then either one of you can come back and speak intellegently about the subject rather than perpetuate slander.

Or intelligently.

Dan · Post by **Dan** » 23 Sep 2003 16:11

xcalibur wrote:
Dan wrote:
demonio wrote:They did attempt to.

I believe it was done at danzig as a one off
Why don't you and Dezerter read through those threads? Then either one of you can come back and speak intellegently about the subject rather than perpetuate slander.

Or intelligently.

Either way, why reinvent the wheel?

ChristopherPerrien · Post by **ChristopherPerrien** » 23 Sep 2003 16:24

Because wheels are not very safe, they ROLL!

Someone needs to invent a square wheel that way there would not be so many frivolous lawsuits from rolling wheels.

Which reminds me I once got run over by a 2 1/2 ton truck in Germany luckily we were in deep mud, and I only got push down into it not hurt.
Buried me up to me ass. The truck might not have gotten stuck in the first place if it had had square wheels.

David Thompson · Post by **David Thompson** » 23 Sep 2003 16:39

Disagreement and discussion are permitted here. Personal insults are not. Be civil or be gone.

DEZERTER · Post by **DEZERTER** » 23 Sep 2003 23:35

Dan,
What in your opinion was "unintelligent slender" coming from my side?

Your statement was a sign of unintelligent behavior, because you attempted to disrespect someone by popping out a conclusion without presenting any premise.
To demonstrate my point, I present to you this hypothetical argument between two kindergarden children"
"You're stupid!"
"Why am I stupid"
"Because you're dumb!"