I just read DT's link to the articles of Hague and Geneva Convention...and i was wondering according to the quote that i posted in here, is there any court ever declared that the partisan activity all over Europe from 1941-1945 were a violation of international law specifically the Hague Convention of 1899?CHAPTER I.--On the Qualifications of Belligerents
The laws, rights, and duties of war apply not only to armies, but also to militia and volunteer corps, fulfilling the following conditions:
To be commanded by a person responsible for his subordinates;
To have a fixed distinctive emblem recognizable at a distance;
To carry arms openly; and
To conduct their operations in accordance with the laws and customs of war.
In countries where militia or volunteer corps constitute the army, or form part of it, they are included under the denomination "army."
Partisans wore no uniforms or distinctive emblems nor carry arms openly...
Is this a big violation of the Hague Convention?