Reason for German invasion of Soviet Union 1941

Discussions on WW2 in Eastern Europe.
michael mills
Member
Posts: 8982
Joined: 11 Mar 2002 12:42
Location: Sydney, Australia

Reason for German invasion of Soviet Union 1941

Post by michael mills » 13 Jul 2004 07:09

Here is a contemporary (1941) view of the essential reason for the German invasion of the Soviet Union in that year. It is sourced from the book "Men and Politics", the autobiography of the American-Jewish journalist Louis Fischer, published in November 1941.

Louis Fischer was a proletarian Jew born in Philadelphia in 1896, who became a famous political journalist in his time. From an Orthodox Jewish background, he initially embraced Zionism and served in the Jewish Legion in the British Army at the end of the First World War (Ben Gurion served in the same unit). Posted to Palestine in 1919-20, he rapidly became disillusioned with Zionism as a result of his experiences there (he foresaw the conflict with the Arabs). From 1921, he started a career as a journalist and went to the young Soviet Union where he lived for many years, becoming an enthusiastic partisan of the Soviet cause, although never a member of the Communist Party. In the mid-1930s he became disenchanted with the Stalinist dictatorship, first because of the Moscow Trials and the Great Terror, then because of Soviet chicanery during the Spanish Civil War (in which he participated as a member of the International Brigades), and finally because of the German-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact of 23 August 1939.

The book "Men and Politics" is Fischer's story of his life and work until 1941.

After the Second World War, Fischer became a fervent proponent of the cause of Indian independence, and is perhaps best known for his biographies of Gandhi.

Here is the extract from the book, starting on page 603:
Why did Hitler attack Russia?

It was not primarily the attraction of Soviet natural wealth that drew Hitler into Russia. Germany's need of grain and oil was not so urgent. The prospect of obtaining Russian raw materials for the prosecution of the war in 1942 or later certainly did enter into the Reichswehr's calculations. But this was not the chief reason for the Russian campaign.

Hitler wished to knock out Russia before America's threatening emergence as a decisive factor in the war. On June 22nd, 1941, there was not yet a western front except in the air. But in the spring of 1942 or thereafter, the increased flow of American munitions across the Atlantic, the intensification of the activity of the United States fleet, and Britain's own growing military power might have created a western front for Hitler, and that could have meant the risk of a two-front war, for Russia, encouraged by Germany's preoccupation with the western front and the consequent undermining of Germany's resistance, might have dared to stab Germany, Russia's traditional enemy, in the back. The main motive of Germany's invasion of Russia was the fear of an Anglo-American front. The more aid America sent to England the more Hitler had to worry about Russia. That may explain why American Communists opposed American aid to Britain. Likewise, the longer Hitler deferred his attack on Russia the greater the danger that America's advancing preparedness would prevent Japan from striking simultaneously at Soviet Siberia and that Britain's newly received armaments in the Middle East would keep Turkey from stepping into the Caucasus.

However, Hitler's thrust into Russia was inspired by more than one consideration. Hitler hoped that his concentration on Russia would revive appeasement in the Britain and pave the way to a truce in the west. The totalitarian mind, notoriously, does not change and does not think that changes in the democratic mind are lasting or serious. Throughout ugly years of appeasement, the British and French governments, and many others had listened to the Nazi fable that germany was the bulwark against Bolshevism. In consideration of this alleged service to capitalism, or to 'western civilisation' as Berlin styled it, certain statesmen in democratic countries were more inclined to connive at fascist aggression. 'Can we not resurrect this mood in London', Hitler thought. The invasion of Russia was a german bid for appeasement, for peace with England.

Rudolf Hess, Hitler's deputy and close personal friend, flew to Scotland on May 10th, 1941. That was six weeks prior to Hitler's declaration of war on the Soviet Union. Such a gigantic attack is not prepared in less than six weeks. Hess knew of the preparations, and he wished to visit his acquaintances of the Chamberlain era, through them get to see Eden or Churchill and suggest to them that now that Germany was 'combating the Communist menace', England ought to call off the war against Germany - until Germany would be ready to resume it. Always, the Nazi guiding aim was war on one front.

Hitler probably hoped to launch a similar peace offensive from Moscow. If he could crush Russia, he would say to the democracies: I have control of the Continent and its riches. I can stand here indefinitely. I cannot invade England, but you cannot invade the Continent. We can only go on bombing and blockading one another for a decade until we are both prostrate. Why not be sensible and come to an understanding?

Hitler sought the elimination of Russia as a first-class military power in order the better to withstand the Anglo-American siege or to lift it by negotiation. The Hess adventure, however, was a total failure, and Hitler's expectation of a renewal of the disastrous Chamberlain policy was dashed against the rock of British, and American, determination to see the war against fascism through to a finish.
Fischer's forecast of the course of the war was remarkably prescient, given that he was writing in 1941 and looking forward to 1942, not looking back on accomplished facts as we are. We was also writing before the United States formally entered the war against Germany (although after the initiation of undeclared naval war).

It is interesting that Fischer, in November 1941, considered that if Germany had not attacked the Soviet Union in June 1941, then the Soviet Union might well have attacked Germany some time after the Spring of 1942, when Germany would be becoming increasingly tied down by growing British strength and American naval activity. That is a view that is being increasingly accepted by some German leftist historians today.

Krasnoarmieyet
Member
Posts: 34
Joined: 12 Jul 2004 06:47
Location: Under the Sea

Post by Krasnoarmieyet » 13 Jul 2004 21:15

It not remarkable that he pridected this everybody knew look at the differnce between nazi and communist idiolgy there bound to clash. and like he said Germany and Russia are terditional enemies so he wason't as smart as you think.

User avatar
Steve
Member
Posts: 959
Joined: 03 Aug 2002 01:58
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Steve » 14 Jul 2004 02:29

Hitler seems to have believed that the UK was rejecting his peace offers because they would try to bring the USA and USSR into the war and the USA was clearly on a collision course with Germany. A war against these three powers maybe was unwinable but if he knocked the power within his reach out, the USSR, and aquired it`s resources then he could face the Anglo/Americans with equanimity. Fisher was I think undoubtedly right though his idea that the USSR might invade in 42 was, given what we now know of the shambolic Red Army after the purges, probably wrong.

It is unlikely that this was the sole reason behind Adolfs decision to attack the USSR but it fitted in nicely with his bizzar ideological views and gave him two reasons. In his second book (book or papers for a book ?) which was written in 1928 but never published he sets out his foreign policy ideas in greater detail than Mein Kampf. He recommended the seizure of 500,000 square kilometres of land from Russia.

If you accept Fishers view then the attack on the USSR had little to do with a preventative strike because they would shortly attack him but everything to do with eliminating a potential future opponant and facing the Anglo/Americans in an unassailable position. Surely you cannot hold the view that Hitler had to attack the USSR because they were going to attack him when you accept the view that he needed to attack east in order to conclude a peace in the west.

michael mills
Member
Posts: 8982
Joined: 11 Mar 2002 12:42
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by michael mills » 14 Jul 2004 06:00

Steve,

Thanks for your comments.

Eliminating a potential future opponent is what a preventive strike is.

Perhaps you were thinking of a pre-emptive strike, which is a strike against an opponent that is on the point of attacking.

Obviously the German attack on 22 June 1941 was not a pre-emptive strike, since the German Government had no awareness of an immediately impending Soviet attack that needed to be stopped (although in the previous month Stalin had considered his own pre-emptive strike, unbeknownst to Germany).

Fischer is implying that it was a preventive strike in the strict sense, ie Germany needed to eliminate the Soviet Union as a military power before it was in a position to ally itself with a strengthening Britain and the United States against Germany.

Fischer, in December 1941, did not think that Germany had attacked the Soviet Union in order to obtain grain and oil from the Soviet Union. It was able to obtain those supplies under its economic agreements with that country, although it had to pay for them with manufactured goods, and its dependence on the Soviet Union as a supplier left it vulnerable to a sudden cessation of supplies in the case Stalin wanted to change sides.

User avatar
Steve
Member
Posts: 959
Joined: 03 Aug 2002 01:58
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Steve » 17 Jul 2004 02:48

I don`t regard it as a preventative strike as there is no evidence that anything needed to be prevented. It was possible that the USSR would ally itself with the Anglo/Americans or launch an attack but this was just conjecture not based on evidence there were other possible scenarios. Stalin had turned down an interesting German offer in 1940 so it seems he was going to stay out of the war. If Hitler was worried that the Soviets might stab him in the back it made more sense to bind the two camps closer together as the Soviets had nothing in common with the democracies. Hitler made an asumption based on no evidence but this assumption that something needed to be done about the USSR fitted in nicely with his ideological views and may have been a way of rationalising a course of action driven mainly by ideology.

The economic arguments which seemed to make sense proved false as (source forgotten) I believe deliveries of raw materials after the invasion failed to match pre invasion deliveries. The peak of German industrial production came in 1944 when sources in the Soviet Union were no longer making much of a contribution. A strike by the Soviets was only considered as they became aware of the German build up on the frontier and was a logical thing to look at.

Hitler had a long winning streak but luckily for western civilisation it came to an end in 1941.

User avatar
Eistir
Member
Posts: 101
Joined: 16 Dec 2002 14:43
Location: estland/sverige

Post by Eistir » 23 Oct 2004 12:04

Hitler had a long winning streak but luckily for western civilisation it came to an end in 1941.
---------------------------------
What are you talking,Hitler WAS a western civilisation.

User avatar
Qvist
Member
Posts: 7836
Joined: 11 Mar 2002 16:59
Location: Europe

Post by Qvist » 25 Oct 2004 14:50

Well, I think the reasons for attacking in the East in 1941 were considerably more complex than this, but certainly, in pointing at the defeat of the USSR as an intended indirect means towards achieving the desired result in the West, he is uncannily close to something that is generally accepted as one of the prime arguments advanced in favour of Barbarossa at the time. I would say though that he overestimates the american factor - I have not seen much to suggest that the US threat was something that occupied Hitler much; if anything he seems to have rather disregarded it.

cheers

Return to “WW2 in Eastern Europe”