The main question is whether there were homicidal gas chambers in Bunker 1 at KL Auschwitz. There are a number of witnesses who say there were, and nothing so far to indicate that there weren't.
You replied:
Neither are you. As pointed out in my post above, including a thread reference, LFS has already denied the existence of homicidal gas chambers in both Bunkers 1 and 2. That’s why I said:Anyone who would attempt this could be accused of denying the Holocaust and be banned from future posting on this forum. You are not quite fair in your conclusion.
This thread is in response to that denial, as is the new Bunker 2 thread at:Again, the primary issue isn't whether small aspects of their accounts may be mistaken, but whether what they're all talking about -- homicidal gas chambers in Bunker 1 -- is something that never existed. In other words, whether the homicidal gas chambers at Bunker 1 are, as LFS put it, "mythical."
see the "Nazi Gas Chambers" thread at:
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... &start=165
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=54706
Although you posted on the thread, you may have missed LFS's remark six weeks ago:
see the "Nazi Gas Chambers" thread at:So, what we can concludes?
Basically, that, for admission of Pressac same, don't exist any documentary proof (or better, any proof) of the existence of homicidal gas chambers in Auschwitz or in Birkenau.
But also that only at the time of the witchcraft trials, these examples of adminicula (parts of proof, presumptions, traces) have anyone significance and validity: so the black cat, the smell of sulphur or others stupidities have induced many judges or ordinary people to trust in the existence of wizards, demons and witchcrafts.
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... c&start=75
LFS is still posting here though, isn't he?
I don’t know how you feel about being the object of sleazy insinuations, but I find it irritating. This most recent suggestion is the third from you which suggests that I am challenging others to answer questions when they will be banned for their honest answer. Here are the other two incidents:
To deny the existence of homicidal gas chambers is to my understanding equivalent to denying the Holocaust. And this is against the rules of this forum and will result in the banning of the poster. Please correct me if I am wrong.
To deny the Holocaust can be punished in Germany with up to five years in jail. Even the legal defence of a Holocaust denier in Germany is difficult if not impossible because the defending attorney may find himself in a situation of Holocaust denial. Too bad.
The debate of the existence of homicidal gas chambers is on this forum a dangerous topic.
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... ht=#479300
You also posted this sentiment:Mr. David Thompson wrote:It is possible to answer my questions without denying that the holocaust took place. It is also possible that a poster might have the opinion that the Nazi government did murder millions of Jewish, Gypsy, Polish and Russian civilians, but committed the killings by gunfire and other forms of lethal ill treatment rather than gassing.
You may want to check this with the bossman.
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... ht=#479621
But you certainly didn’t have any problem the very next day expressing your beliefs on the subject:David Thompson:Hundreds of people said they saw something. If that something was never there, why did all those people say it was? How exactly is the question too broad and vague to answer? Why is it too difficult to debate?
A statement like "hundreds of victims, defendants, bystanders, subsequent witnesses and court proceedings, involving a dozen or more nations over a time frame of 60+ years, who said that there were homicidal gas chambers" would form in my opinion the basis of a belief. And I don't think that I care to debate someone elses believes. That is asking for trouble.
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... ht=#480039
In that post, you not only denied the existence of a homicidal gas chamber in Bunker 1 at KL Auschwitz; you denied that there were any homicidal gas chambers at all. But you're still posting here, aren't you? Under those circumstances, why would you insinuate -- two weeks after you denied that there were any homicidal gas chambers at all -- that:In my opinion the concept of the Holocaust homicidal gas chambers should have been abandoned long ago. It is artificially kept alive only with the help of laws against Holocaust denial (Up to 5 years imprisonment in Germany, in Austria I think up to 20 years). This will last only a short time, until someone will certainly shout "But the emperor has no clothes on!"
And everyone will laugh.
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... ht=#480688
Anyone who would attempt this [deny the existence of a homicidal gas chamber in Bunker 1 at KL Auschwitz] could be accused of denying the Holocaust and be banned from future posting on this forum.
Did you forget what you had written -- and gotten away with -- earlier? Or were you just being insincere when you posted your third innuendo on the subject of banning?
I asked you this question before, and you wouldn’t answer it. Normally I would let it pass, but since you seem a little “hung up” on the subject, I’ll ask it again:
So how about it, Konrad? Why would a person want to participate in a forum where he didn't agree with the rules? What kind of person would play the part of a deceiver, in order to be able to post in a forum?Konrad -- You said:"Non-denial deniers" Mr. WalterS? Very clever! It seems to me that the a non-denial denier is the result of the rules of this forum. Maybe one day someone opens a forum where anti-revisionism is not allowed. I am just trying to figure out how to call the occasional anti-revisionist who may have succeded to sneek in to such a forum. Any idea?
Why would a person want to participate in a forum where he didn't agree with the rules? What kind of person would play the part of a deceiver, in order to be able to post in a forum?
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... ht=#480688
