[This thread was split off by the moderator from the thread "Soeren Kam 'should face trial.'" -- DT]
> It is shameful to pursue an old man
Because there are criminals who are more or less the same age are still living comfywithout any trials for them...You want names? Ummm....how about the epurators?
But fact is that all the still alive hangmen of Katyn have not been trialed
Name even one.
David Irving's Nuremberg The Last Battle, in the introduction, the author stated that in 1990, the KGB interviewed one of the NKVD man who participated in the murder at Katyn......This interview is not to determine whether he should be brought into trial but in fact the KGB was interested to know the technicalities of accomplishing such mass murder at Katyn..
> Who are we today to judge what happened at this time
Nobody invites you to judge, that's for certain.
Ostuf Charlemagne is not a judge, so he didn't give any judgement. It is only his opinion, not his judgement and everyone is entitled to one.
> So if somebody would like to pursue an Unconditionnal Hate forever , even for 80 old peoples ,then we should judge and sentence the murderers of BOTH SIDES !!!
Sure, though members of resistance and partisans were not murderers per se.
Are you sure?
> Let the old man in PEACE !!!!
Why should one let a murderer go free?
Soeren Kam had not even undergo any trial, so why labeled his as a murderer? (unless it's in your mind that every Waffen SS member was a murderer)...He is alleged (in the article) to murder someone...ARe you forgetting the dictum, innocent until proven guilty? Or perhaps you had mistaken for Uncle Iosif's, Beria's and Dzershinsky's dictum, guilty until proven innocent?