Must See Pictures of Yukikaze

Discussions on all aspects of the Japanese Empire, from the capture of Taiwan until the end of the Second World War.
User avatar
David C. Clarke
In memoriam
Posts: 11368
Joined: 10 Mar 2002, 18:17
Location: U.S. of A.

Must See Pictures of Yukikaze

#1

Post by David C. Clarke » 17 Mar 2006, 02:21

You guys have to check out these newly released Photos of IJN DD Yukikaze after the war!!!! The rarity of good pictures of Japanese WWII destroyers is legendary, so--even disarmed-- these pictures are wonderful historical records.

Image

Image

Best,
David
Last edited by David C. Clarke on 17 Mar 2006, 02:31, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
David C. Clarke
In memoriam
Posts: 11368
Joined: 10 Mar 2002, 18:17
Location: U.S. of A.

#2

Post by David C. Clarke » 17 Mar 2006, 02:24

And:

Image


Best,
David


User avatar
David C. Clarke
In memoriam
Posts: 11368
Joined: 10 Mar 2002, 18:17
Location: U.S. of A.

#3

Post by David C. Clarke » 17 Mar 2006, 02:29

Now for the two rarest, the Bridge and engine room:

Image

Image

All of these pictures ar available from the U.S. Navy Historical Branch;

http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/sh-f ... kikaze.htm

I can't begin to explain how expensive these pictures would be, if you could find them, in a Japanese language book.
Please tell me if you like them! :D

Best,
David

User avatar
David C. Clarke
In memoriam
Posts: 11368
Joined: 10 Mar 2002, 18:17
Location: U.S. of A.

#4

Post by David C. Clarke » 17 Mar 2006, 02:37

By the way, Yukikaze was the only destroyer of her class--the Kagero Class--to survive the war. She fought in nearly every major campaign, including Yamato's last suicide sortie and ended up in the Chinese navy as a war reparation. Her anchor today is at Eta Jima, the former Imperial Japanese Navy officer's academy.

For you modelers, Nichimo makes a 1/200 scale kit of two Kagero classs ships, Kagero and Shiranuhi, either of which can be easily modified to represent Yukikaze.

Best,
David

User avatar
Gen_Del_Pilar
Member
Posts: 130
Joined: 22 May 2004, 21:00
Location: Europe

#5

Post by Gen_Del_Pilar » 17 Mar 2006, 03:10

Was Yukikaze officially credited with the sinking of USS Laffey (DD-459) or was that another vessel?

Btw, excellent pics! 8-)

User avatar
David C. Clarke
In memoriam
Posts: 11368
Joined: 10 Mar 2002, 18:17
Location: U.S. of A.

#6

Post by David C. Clarke » 17 Mar 2006, 03:31

Yukikaze was credited by the Japanese navy with sinking both Barton and Laffey, but these claims are hard to evaluate, as the battle was a melee'. My strictly personal opinion is that these claims are unlikely, but not impossible.

Best,
David

User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 14:18
Location: Australia

#7

Post by Peter H » 17 Mar 2006, 05:33

Cool. :)

Destroyers appear to disappear from the historical record as preservation relics as well.The BIG ships seem to get all the attention.

Regards,
Peter

User avatar
Tom Houlihan
Member
Posts: 3987
Joined: 06 Oct 2002, 06:53
Location: MI, USA
Contact:

#8

Post by Tom Houlihan » 17 Mar 2006, 07:26

Those ships are tiny!!! I have some sea-time under my belt in small ships, but I'm having trouble imagining going even near, let along through Tai-fun in one of those!!

User avatar
Xavier
Member
Posts: 3260
Joined: 12 Nov 2002, 03:01
Location: South of the Texas Border.. :)

#9

Post by Xavier » 17 Mar 2006, 16:55

nice find David, it is the first time I have seen the actual mounts (tower, yoke & craddle) for the japanese binos on a enclosed bridge enviroment ..
Xavier
Instandsetzungtruppfuhrer

User avatar
tom!
Member
Posts: 892
Joined: 15 Dec 2003, 12:42
Location: Dorsten Germany
Contact:

#10

Post by tom! » 17 Mar 2006, 20:46

Hi.

Very nice pictures.

The second picture shows the radar antennas, too. Thats a very interesting find for me....

Thanks for sharing the info.

Yours

tom! :wink:

User avatar
David C. Clarke
In memoriam
Posts: 11368
Joined: 10 Mar 2002, 18:17
Location: U.S. of A.

#11

Post by David C. Clarke » 18 Mar 2006, 02:38

Those ships are tiny!!!
That's what I said when I actually stepped aboad the Fletcher class U.S.S. Kidd. In tonnage, Yukikaze and Kidd were very similar, but Japanese destroyers had minimal superstructures compared to Fletcher type destroyers, which improved Japanese DD's stability but really increases the perception that the ship is tiiiny.

Xavier, this is a case of finally finding a picture that I knew about. A much smaller version of the Bridge picture is tucked away in a book called "The Battle of Tassafaronga" which was published some years ago. I always wondered where the photo came from, as I had never before seen a photo of the inside of the bridge of a Japanese DD and my collection of IJN materials is fairly large.

Two things to note: First, the ship's wheel in a Kagero class was located one deck below the bridge, which is why you don't see it in the photo. Secondly, notice that there aren't any armored shutters for the Bridge windows. This is remarkable considering the ship's employment. The Japanese Destroyer captain Hara pointed out in his book that the Bridge roof was enough "to keep the rain off", so it's not like there was any armor up there to protect the cerew from strafing attacks.

But overall, the ship's condition in 1947, after four years of total war and two years of post war neglect, is absolutely remarkable! Yukikaze was considered a "lucky ship' in the IJN, just like Prinz Eugen in the Kriegsmarine. It's a shame that neither were preserved, but understandable. I just wonder how many more of these photos are waiting to be re-discovered!

Best Regards,
David

zstar
Member
Posts: 157
Joined: 15 Oct 2004, 07:32
Location: as

#12

Post by zstar » 18 Mar 2006, 05:30

pictures not showing

User avatar
David C. Clarke
In memoriam
Posts: 11368
Joined: 10 Mar 2002, 18:17
Location: U.S. of A.

#13

Post by David C. Clarke » 18 Mar 2006, 05:41

Must be your browser, try using the link in the post.

Best,
David

Zygmunt
Member
Posts: 1599
Joined: 31 May 2002, 20:50
Location: Wielka Brytania

#14

Post by Zygmunt » 18 Mar 2006, 17:45

David C. Clarke wrote:Please tell me if you like them! :D
I do! Very interesting; thanks David.
David C. Clarke wrote:By the way, Yukikaze... ...ended up in the Chinese navy as a war reparation.
Really? When was that? Sometime after 1947, I take it, but do we know more? Did she see much service? I take it she didn't end up in Chinese Communist hands... or did she?
I did do some quick Googling to see if there were any straightforward answers to my questions, but alas, muddied those waters were...
David C. Clarke wrote:Yukikaze was credited by the Japanese navy with sinking both Barton and Laffey, but these claims are hard to evaluate, as the battle was a melee'. My strictly personal opinion is that these claims are unlikely, but not impossible.
Your disclaimer about the uncertainty of what happened in the melee notwithstanding, what is your opinion on i) what Yukikaze may have achieved in that battle, and ii), what actually did happen to Barton and Laffey?

Zygmunt

User avatar
Gen_Del_Pilar
Member
Posts: 130
Joined: 22 May 2004, 21:00
Location: Europe

#15

Post by Gen_Del_Pilar » 18 Mar 2006, 20:11

Zygmunt wrote:Your disclaimer about the uncertainty of what happened in the melee notwithstanding, what is your opinion on i) what Yukikaze may have achieved in that battle, and ii), what actually did happen to Barton and Laffey?
Was about to ask a similar question. In addition to the two that David mentioned (wasn't aware of the Barton credit before btw), didn't Yukikaze have some sort of a claim to sinking DDs Gwin and even Johnston (the latter being the more unlikely)? And at Java Sea, did Yukikaze contribute to any spreads?

Post Reply

Return to “Japan at War 1895-1945”